Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Value Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for Patients with Osteosarcoma
Shuangquan Zhao,Daohui Zeng,Jianxun Song,Jiuping Liang,Yongsheng Zhou,Yi Zhu,Lu Xu,Guanxun Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2018.2339
2018-01-01
Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics
Abstract:Background and objective: Being regarded as the most commonly diagnosed primary bone neoplasm, Osteosarcoma (OS) is originated from mesenchymal tissues. The children, adolescents, and young adults between the ages 10 and 30 are the main populations who tend to suffer from OS. As we all know, the longtime follow-up care is of great importance for OS, and the non-invasive diagnostic technologies are essential and beneficial for OS patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the imaging characteristics and application value of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of OS, and make comparisons between MRI and CT, thereby to provide necessary references for clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in our hospital, and 122 OS patients who were diagnosed definitely by postoperative pathologic examinations were included. These identified patients ever received CT or/and MRI examinations before surgery. The diagnosis accuracy, misdiagnosis rate, and rate of missed diagnosis of CT and MRI were calculated, respectively. And the comprehensive comparisons between them were made in further. Results: 65 males and 57 females were identified, and the age range was 15-24 (mean age: 19.6 years old). 46 patients ever underwent CT, and 31 patients underwent MRI, and 45 patients underwent CT and MRI. The affected lesions included tibia (N = 89), femur (N = 22), humerus (N = 11). The primary CT imaging features included bone destruction (88/91, 96.70%), bone tumor (86/91, 94.51%), tiny bone tumor (44/91, 48.35%), soft tissue masses (21/31, 67.74%), jumpy lesions (7/28, 25.00%), codman triangle (3/35, 8.57%), and peritumoral edema (5/27, 18.51%). The primary MRI imaging features included bone destruction (70/76, 92.11%), bone tumor (73/76, 96.05%), tiny bone tumor (17/21, 80.95%), soft tissue masses (41/42, 97.62%), jumpy lesions (12/12, 100%), codman triangle (5/28, 17.86%), and peritumoral edema (15/15, 100%). MRI was strongly advantaged in detecting tiny bone tumor, soft tissue masses, jumpy lesions, and peritumoral edema. Secondly, the detection rate of Codman triangle was higher in MRI group. The accuracy rate of CT was 81.21%, and the missed or false diagnosis was 18.79%, the accuracy rate of MRI was 94.89%, and the missed or false diagnosis was 5.11%, the accuracy rate of CT and MRI was 98.21%, and the missed or false diagnosis was 1.79%. Conclusions: CT and MRI both have their own superiorities in detecting OS lesions, and the combination of CT and MRI indeed improved the diagnostic accuracy for patients suffering from OS. Hence, the combined diagnosis strategy should be generalized in clinical practice.