Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Interventional Closure Using Septal Occluder with Surgical Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defect:A Meta Analysis of Controlled Trials
Yong-wei ZHANG,Ming HUANG,Yang-de HHUA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2007.01.002
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of interventional closure using septal occluder with surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) in this systematic review of controlled trials.Methods The Cochrane Controlled TrialRegistry, MEDLINE,CBMA and EMBASE were searched for all controlled trials. Data were extracted for procedural failure rate、residual shunt rates、major complication rates and minor complication rates. The software RevMan 4.2.8 was used for data analysis. Treatment effects on these outcomes were summarized as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results 13 articles identified were eligible controlled trials and included. All were reporting about the effect of transcatheter closure and surgery on secundum atrial septal defect. All controlled trials did not apply randomizationand enforce allocation concealment.Only one of the 13 trials was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The combined results showed that the procedural failure rate of transcatheter closure group (n=1 085) was higher than that of surgery(n=631)(9 controlled trials, 4.61% vs 0.32%,RR=5.48,95% CI:2.28 -13.21,P=0.000 1).Although the instant residual shunt rates of transcatheter closure group(n=495)were higher than that of surgery(n=182)(2 controlled trials, 3.84% vs 0,RR=7.61,95% CI:1.04-55.99, P=0.05),they were similar in one year of follow-up in both groups(n=402/182)(1.74% vs 0%,RR=3.54,95% CI:0.45- 27.72,P=0.23). Total complication rates of surgery group(n=845)and transcatheter closure group(n=1 191)were 28.52% and 6.8%, respectively(13 controlled trials, RR=0.24,95% CI:0.19- 0.31, P 0.000 01),major complication rates of each group were 4.23% and 1.56 % respectively(12 controlled trials, n=1 155/780,RR=0.37,95% CI:0.21-0.64, P= 0.000 4), arrhythmias rates of each group were 11.25% and 3.85% respectively(9 controlled trials, n=806/622,RR=0.34,95% CI:0.21-0.53,P0.000 01).Conclusions Although the procedural attempt successful rate of transcatheter closure group was lower than that of surgery group, the residual shunt rates of both groups were similar. In the transcatheter closure group, the complication rate was lower than that of surgery group.