Abstract:Parametric volatility models can be seen as the result of some form of dimensionality reduction obtained by projecting the volatility surface into a basis of risk factors. Examples include polynomial models and stochastic volatility models having an explicit expression for the smile, such as the SVI and the SABR model. When modelling the dynamics of the risk factors, one can define some stochastic processes, consider a statistical model, or assume that they are function of some exogenous explanatory variables (such as the spot price and volume). In the first two, we are tied to our ability of capturing the true dynamics of the underlying stochastic processes, leading to computation errors, in the latter we assume known the explanatory variables. Alternatively, we can use machine learning to implicitly infer the dynamics of the risk factors, or that of their explanatory variables, from market data. We let the risk factors be function of some stochastic explanatory variables: the spot price, the set of time-to-maturity, the trading volume, some external noise factors, the estimated volatility, and financial indicators like the VIX. We use a statistical model to capture the relation between the risk factors and their explanatory variables, and estimate empirically the model parameters. The risk factors being stochastic, we estimate the future implied volatility surface on average, by solving its conditional expectation with respect to the explanatory variables. This is a multi-step prediction problem, and we propose to use temporal difference backpropagation (TDBP) models for learning to predict the value function. This way, we use market data to estimate the implicit stochastic processes driving the dynamics of the future volatility surface. We test the performance of our model on three well known parametric volatility models against Monte Carlo simulations, and we show the effects of the explanatory variables on the dynamics of the volatility surface. In all cases, we recover nearly exactly the expected volatility surface generated by the Monte Carlo simulations with only one five hundredth paths. Our framework can be applied to option pricing and hedging as well as to risk management.

Are There Gains from Using Information over the Surface of Implied Volatilities?

Volatility Risk Premium, Good Volatility and Bad Volatility: Evidence from SSE 50 ETF Options

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Implied volatility surfaces: a comprehensive analysis using half a billion option prices

Forecasting Stock Market Volatility Using Implied Volatility

Implied volatility surface predictability: The case of commodity markets

Gated deep neural networks for implied volatility surfaces

Predicting Volatility and the Information Content of Informed Traders in an Option Market

Downside Volatility Timing

Hidden Markov model-based modeling and prediction for implied volatility surface1

Predicting Future Implied Volatility Surface Using TDBP-Learning

Volatility Parametrizations with Random Coefficients: Analytic Flexibility for Implied Volatility Surfaces

On implied volatility for options—Some reasons to smile and more to correct

Heterogeneous Volatility Information Content for the Realized GARCH Modeling and Forecasting Volatility

Uncovering the Benefit of High-Frequency Data in Portfolio Allocation

A two-step framework for arbitrage-free prediction of the implied volatility surface

A neural network approach to understanding implied volatility movements

Deep Learning Based Dynamic Implied Volatility Surface