Effects of atmospheric dynamics and aerosols on the thermodynamic phase of cold clouds

Jiming Li,Qiaoyi Lv,Min Zhang,Tianhe Wang,Kazuaki Kawamoto,Siyu Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-147
IF: 6.3
2016-01-01
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Abstract:Abstract. Based on the 4 years (2007–2010) of data from the CloudSat 2B-CLDCLASS-LIDAR product, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Auxiliary (ECMWF-AUX) product and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) level 2 5 km aerosol layer product, this study investigates the impact of atmospheric dynamics and aerosol on cold cloud (cloud top temperature < 0 ºC) phase on a global scale in order to better understand the conditions under which supercooled liquid water will gradually transform to ice phase. Our results show that the thresholds of parameter Tice (is the temperature below which all clouds are ice), Tw (is the temperature above which all clouds are liquid) and n (is a shape parameter that controls the relationship between supercooled liquid cloud fraction (SCF) and cloud top temperature) aren't unique for the entire globe as many models adopted. The value of Tw ranges from −2 ºC to −6 ºC at the most regions of the globe, and decreases from high latitudes to tropics. For Tice, its value is warmer (>−26 ºC) in the typical stratocumulus regions than the values at the other regions (<30 ºC). The geographic distributions of parameter n are closely linked to aerosol loading and meteorological parameters, and its value varies strongly from 0 to 5. By comparing the absolute and relative differences between different cloud phase schemes and observation, we suggest that the cloud phase scheme used in Community Atmosphere Model (version 3, CAM3) and CAM5 can be considered as a preferred option in the models, and the application of dynamic thresholds of Tice, Tw and n will further improve the predictions of SCF, particularly over the region of poleward of 40°. Statistical results indicate that aerosol effect on nucleation can't fully explain the all changes of cold cloud phase in our study. SCF at a given temperature also appears to be related to the different collocations of surface temperature, vertical velocity and lower-tropospheric static stability (LTSS). We find that strong vertical motion can also enhance glaciation process and reduce the SCF (or increase n value) as ice nuclei aerosol did, and force the supercooled water to glaciate at a warmer temperature. For same vertical motion, however, high LTSS (or low surface temperature) tends to increase the SCF and force the supercooled water to glaciate at a colder temperature. Unstable atmosphere (low LTSS and high surface temperature) in those strong ascent regions favors deep convective cloud, and further exhausts the supercooled water by strong precipitation rate. Our results verify the importance and regional of dynamical factors on the changes of cold cloud phase, have potential implications for further improving the parameterization of the cloud phase and determining the climate feedbacks.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?