Abstract:Recipients often reject unfair offers at the cost of their own interests in ultimatum games (UGs), reflecting their fairness preference. Yet fairness preference is not invariable. It is affected by various factors, among which empathy plays an important role. Individuals might, for example, sacrifice own interests to help others in need. This kind of behavior not only is contrary to the pursuit of self-interest maximization but also violates fairness principles. As individuals are not only concerned about fairness but also care for others, this study focuses on managing the relationship between the two potentially conflicting goals. We explored individuals’ behaviors and time dynamic processes of brain activities when fairness conflicted with empathy. It was hypothesized that empathy could modulate fairness-related decision making behaviors and ERPs. Thirty-seven college students (26 females, 21.00 ± 2.07 years) participated in this study and completed multiple ultimatum games. EEG signals were recorded during play. In the task, the proposers were underprivileged students (empathy condition) and ordinary children (non-empathy condition). Each proposer distributed 10 yuan between themself and one recipient. The participants played as recipients who would choose to accept or reject distribution offers (fair, disadvantageous unfair, advantageous unfair) by the proposers. The proposers and recipients would get the assigned money only if participants accepted the distribution offers. They received nothing if participants rejected the offer. The behavioral results showed that the acceptance rate in the empathy condition was greater than that in the non-empathy condition for the disadvantageous unfair condition, while the opposite result occurred in the advantageous unfair condition. The EEG results showed that in the non-empathy condition, the advantageous unfair offer induced more negative anterior N1 (AN1) than it did in the empathy condition, but there was no difference between the disadvantageous unfair versus fair conditions. In the advantageous unfair condition, the P2 amplitude of the

Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

The Neural Correlate of Mid-Value Offers in Ultimatum Game

Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness

The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study

Influence of Empathic Concern on Fairness-Related Decision Making: Evidence from ERP

Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Neural Correlates of Proposers’ Fairness Perception in Punishment and Non-Punishment Economic Games

Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game

A premium for positive social interest and attractive voices in the acceptability of unfair offers? An ERP study

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

Hello Handsome! Male's Facial Attractiveness Gives Rise to Female's Fairness Bias in Ultimatum Game Scenarios-an ERP Study.

Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: an ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.

Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Fear of Rejection or Concern for Fairness: the Proposer's Offering Behavior in the Ultimatum Game

You Did Not Mean It: Perceived Good Intentions Alleviate Sense of Unfairness

You Are Excusable! Neural Correlates of Economic Neediness on Empathic Concern and Fairness Perception.

Beauty affects fairness: facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game

Gender Differences in Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness Under Social Pressure

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials