Abstract:Background: Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in female cancer patients. The disease can be detected early using Mammography, an effective X-ray imaging technology. The most important step in mammography is the classification of mammogram patches as benign or malignant. Classically, benign or malignant breast tumors are diagnosed by radiologists' interpretation of mammograms based on clinical parameters. However, because masses are heterogeneous, clinical parameters supply limited information on mammography mass. Therefore, this study aimed to predict benign or malignant breast masses using a combination of image biomarkers and clinical parameters. Methods: We trained a deep learning (DL) fusion network of VGG16 and Inception-V3 network in 5,996 mammography images from the training cohort; DL features were extracted from the second fully connected layer of the DL fusion network. We then developed a combined model incorporating DL features, hand-crafted features, and clinical parameters to predict benign or malignant breast masses. The prediction performance was compared between clinical parameters and the combination of the above features. The strengths of the clinical model and the combined model were subsequently validated in a test cohort (n = 244) and an external validation cohort (n = 100), respectively. Results: Extracted features comprised 30 hand-crafted features, 27 DL features, and 5 clinical features (shape, margin type, breast composition, age, mass size). The model combining the three feature types yielded the best performance in predicting benign or malignant masses (AUC = 0.961) in the test cohort. A significant difference in the predictive performance between the combined model and the clinical model was observed in an independent external validation cohort (AUC: 0.973 vs. 0.911, p = 0.019). Conclusion: The prediction of benign or malignant breast masses improves when image biomarkers and clinical parameters are combined; the combined model was more robust than clinical parameters alone.

Mass classification of benign and malignant with a new twin support vector machine joint l_2,1 -norm

Classification of masses on mammograms using support vector machine

Mass diagnosis in mammography with mutual information based feature selection and support vector machine

A Weighted Support Vector Machine Method and Its Application

Mass Classification in Mammography with Morphological Features and Multiple Kernel Learning

Improvement of Mass Detection in Mammogram Using Multi-View Information

A Benign and Malignant Mass Classification Algorithm Based on an Improved Level Set Segmentation and Texture Feature Analysis

Improved Local Binary Patterns For Classification Of Masses Using Mammography

Mass Classification in Mammogram with Semi-Supervised Relief Based Feature Selection

Multiclass Cancer Classification by Using Fuzzy Support Vector Machine and Binary Decision Tree with Gene Selection

A new automatic method for mass detection in mammography with false positives reduction by supported vector machine

Constructing the Optimal Classification Model for Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors Based on Multifeature Analysis from Multimodal Images

Joint 2D-3D Breast Cancer Classification

Multi-Features-Based Automated Breast Tumor Diagnosis Using Ultrasound Image and Support Vector Machine

SGL-SVM: A novel method for tumor classification via support vector machine with sparse group Lasso

A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features

Non-convex SVM for cancer diagnosis based on morphologic features of tumor microenvironment

Improving the Prediction of Benign or Malignant Breast Masses Using a Combination of Image Biomarkers and Clinical Parameters

A novel breast tumor classification algorithm using neutrosophic score features

Weighted Twin Support Vector Machines with Local Information and Its Application.

Breast mass classification based on supervised contrastive learning and multi-view consistency penalty on mammography