Abstract:Cancer classification plays an important role in cancer treatment. There has been no general approach for this problem now. The tasks for cancer classification are of two aspects: identifying new cancer classes and assigning tumors to known classes, which are called class discovery and class prediction by Golub et al. [1]. From mathematical point of view, class discovery is a cluster analysis problem, while class prediction is usually called classification problem (we’ll use the later name to keep consist with pattern recognition literatures). Until now, cancer classification has been based primarily on morphological appearance of tumor [1]. This has serious limitations because of ambiguity. Golub et al. presented a new approach to cancer classification based on gene expression monitoring by DNA microarrays in [1]. They chose acute leukemia as a test case, and the target is to distinguish between ALL (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) and AML (acute myeloid leukemia), which is a typical cancer classification problem not well solved despite many years of efforts. This paper is a report of our work on the classification (prediction) part of this problem following their original work. Golub et al. adopted a feature selection (gene selection) procedure before classification. A metric was defined to evaluate the correlation of each gene to the classification. After some “good” genes were selected from all the 6817 genes, the classification is done by a weighted voting scheme. The classifier was trained on a 38-sample training set, and another 34-sample set was used for testing. With leave-one-out cross-validation on the training set with 50 selected genes, 36 out of 38 samples were correctly classified and 2 were rejected (no-call). The performance on the test set was that 29 samples out of 34 were correctly classified and the other 5 were rejected. If the classifier were compelled to give these 5 no-calls a prediction, the prediction would be wrong. Since the feature selection procedure is of single selection type, and the classification method is also an intuitive one, we believe that there is still much space for the performance to be improved. In our approach to the problem, we took all the genes for the classification (the selection problem will be discussed in another paper), and applied the support vector machine(SVM) method and one of its improved version CSVM as the classifier. Thanks to the better generalization ability of SVM and CSVM, much better performance was obtained.

SGL-SVM: A novel method for tumor classification via support vector machine with sparse group Lasso

Multiclass Cancer Classification by Using Fuzzy Support Vector Machine and Binary Decision Tree with Gene Selection

ALL/AML Cancer Classification by Gene Expression Data Using SVM and CSVM Approach

SVM-Based Tumor Classification with Gene Expression Data

Oriented Feature Selection SVM Applied to Cancer Prediction in Precision Medicine

On Gene Selection and Classification for Cancer Microarray Data Using Multi-Step Clustering and Sparse Representation

The Classification of Tumor Using Gene Expression Profile Based on Support Vector Machines and Factor Analysis.

A Self-Training Subspace Clustering Algorithm under Low-Rank Representation for Cancer Classification on Gene Expression Data

A support vector machine ensemble for cancer classification using gene expression data

Feature selection for cancer classification based on support vector machine

Retracted: Overcoming the Inadaptability of Sparse Group Lasso for Data with Various Group Structures by Stacking

Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data

Improving accuracy for cancer classification with a new algorithm for genes selection

Gene Selection Utilizing Support Vector Machine Methods Based On Sensitivity

Sparse Representation for Tumor Classification Based on Feature Extraction Using Latent Low-Rank Representation.

Optimizing Sparse Generalized Singular Vectors for Feature Selection in Proximal Support Vector Machines with Application to Breast and Ovarian Cancer Detection

A Dynamic Subspace Learning Method for Tumor Classification Using Microarray Gene Expression Data

A kernel-free L1 norm regularized -support vector machine model with application

Machine learning techniques and chi-square feature selection for cancer classification using SAGE gene expression profiles

Metasample-Based Sparse Representation for Tumor Classification

GLassonet: Identifying Discriminative Gene Sets among Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer