Abstract:Purpose Based on Behavioral Theory of Negotiations (Walton & McKersie, 1965), the purpose of this paper is to discuss the existing gap between negotiation theory and pedagogy and presents an experiential teaching tool that closes this gap. The tool is a ‘serious game’ (Abt, 1975) that reinforces all four core negotiation subprocesses while allowing students to practice their negotiation skills and several critical business competencies in a realistic and improvisational context. Design/methodology/approach After successfully using NegotioPoly for five years, qualitative and quantitative data were collected in three sections of negotiation classes to assess student learning and behaviors while playing NegotioPoly and to collect student feedback on the effectiveness of NegotioPoly in teaching and reinforcing key negotiation skills. Findings Findings support that NegotioPoly is highly effective in engaging students in a series of realistic negotiations, joint problem solving and strategic decision-making. Results show that, during the game, students demonstrate their negotiation skills and learnings, and they practice all four negotiation subprocesses of distributive, integrative and intraorganizational bargaining and attitudinal structuring. Practical implications NegotioPoly enables students to engage in distributive and integrative bargaining, multiple levels of negotiations and coalitions in quick succession. Students practice organizational politics and adjust their negotiations based on relationships and social realities, as they demonstrate advanced deal-making behaviors and core business competencies of problem solving, decision-making, analytical skills and ability to work with others. Social implications NegotioPoly reinforces core business competencies such as negotiation, problem solving, analytical skills and the ability to work in teams that employers look for and, therefore, is a useful tool for preparing students for the business world. Originality/value NegotioPoly is an experiential learning tool that closes the gap between negotiation theory and pedagogy while providing deep learning and realistic practice opportunities for students where they can use their negotiation skills in a gaming environment that uses multi-party and multi-round negotiations.

Purple Dragons and Yellow Toadstools a Versatile Exercise for Introducing Students to Negotiated Consensus

Exploring Debaters and Audiences' Depth of Critical Thinking and Its Relationship with Their Participation in Debate Activities

Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-based learning approach

Purple Perils redux: Open-ended, AI-resistant reasoning problems for introductory undergraduate sensation and perception instruction

An Approach for Combining Ethical Principles with Public Opinion to Guide Public Policy

Helping students deal with Ethical Reasoning: The Proto-Guidelines for Ethical Practice in Mathematics as a deck of cards

Rowing in the Same Direction Using MIX—A Tool to Initiate the Melding of Individual Disciplinary Experts into an Integrated Interdisciplinary Team

Role-Playing Computer Ethics: Designing and Evaluating the Privacy by Design (PbD) Simulation

Conflicts in Chemistry: The Case of Plastics, A Role-Playing Game for High School Chemistry Students

NegotioPoly: a holistic gaming approach to negotiation teaching

Experiential Exercise in Team Formation in the Capstone: Providing Students With the Information to Make Good Team Choices

Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization

Student ethical reasoning confidence pre/post an innovative makerspace course: A survey of ethical reasoning

Disagreement, justification, and equitable moral judgments: A brief training study

Toward Motivating Participants to Assess Peers' Work More Fairly: Taking Programing Language Learning As an Example

Stacking up against alternative conceptions: using Uno cards to introduce discourse and argumentation

Value Cards: An Educational Toolkit for Teaching Social Impacts of Machine Learning through Deliberation

Making productive use of exemplars: Peer discussion and teacher guidance for positive transfer of strategies

Using the Jigsaw Technique to Teach Clinical Controversy in a Clinical Skills Course

Respecting Opposing Viewpoints through Debate and Discussion of Controversial Public Health Issues: A Double-Blinded Active Learning Design

Experimenting with Experimentation: Rethinking The Role of Experimentation in Educational Design