Abstract:Case studies are typically used to teach 'ethics', but in quantitative courses it can seem distracting, for both instructor and learner, to introduce a case analysis. Moreover, case analyses are typically focused on issues relating to people: obtaining consent, dealing with research team members, and/or potential institutional policy violations. While relevant to some research, not all students in quantitative courses plan to become researchers, and ethical practice is an essential topic for students of of mathematics, statistics, data science, and computing regardless of whether or not the learner intends to do research. Ethical reasoning is a way of thinking that requires the individual to assess what they know about a potential ethical problem (their prerequisite knowledge), and in some cases, how behaviors they observe, are directed to perform, or have performed, diverge from what they know to be ethical behavior. Ethical reasoning is a learnable, improvable set of knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable learners to recognize what they do and do not know about what constitutes 'ethical practice' of a discipline, and in some cases, to contemplate alternative decisions about how to first recognize, and then proceed past, or respond to, such divergences. A stakeholder analysis is part of prerequisite knowledge, and can be used whether there is or is not an actual case or situation to react to. In courses with mainly quantitative content, a stakeholder analysis is a useful tool for instruction and assessment. It can be used to both integrate authentic ethical content and encourage careful quantitative thought. It is a mistake to treat 'training in ethical practice' and 'training in responsible conduct of research' as the same thing. This paper discusses how to introduce ethical reasoning, stakeholder analysis, and ethical practice standards authentically in quantitative courses.

Helping students deal with Ethical Reasoning: The Proto-Guidelines for Ethical Practice in Mathematics as a deck of cards

Teaching Resources for Embedding Ethics in Mathematics: Exercises, Projects, and Handouts

Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-based learning approach

A useful ethics framework for mathematics teachers

Design Principles That Support Course Design Innovation for Elementary Mathematics Methods Courses

A Field Guide to Ethics in Mathematics

Leveraging guidelines for ethical practice of statistics and computing to develop standards for ethical mathematical practice: A White Paper

Facilitating the Integration of Ethical Reasoning into Quantitative Courses: Stakeholder Analysis, Ethical Practice Standards, and Case Studies

Prototype Problem Solving Activities Increasing Creative Learning Opportunities Using Computer Modeling and 3D Printing

A Hippocratic Oath for mathematicians? Mapping the landscape of ethics in mathematics

Learning Outcomes supporting the integration of Ethical Reasoning into quantitative courses: Three tasks for use in three general contexts

Ways of Developing Creative Thinking and Reasoning of Students in Mathematics Learning

The Moral-IT Deck: a tool for ethics by design

Value Cards: An Educational Toolkit for Teaching Social Impacts of Machine Learning through Deliberation

CS2Mulch: Physical Manipulatives for Teaching Advanced Data Structures

Manifesto for the Responsible Development of Mathematical Works -- A Tool for Practitioners and for Management

Reflective Groupwork for Introductory Proof-Writing Courses

Teaching at the Intersection of Social Justice, Ethics, and the ASA Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice

Developing Critical Thinking Skills from Dispositions to Abilities: Mathematics Education from Early Childhood to High School

Gameplay in Perspective: Applications of a Conceptual Framework to Analyze Features of Mathematics Classroom Games in Consideration of Students’ Experiences

Purple Dragons and Yellow Toadstools a Versatile Exercise for Introducing Students to Negotiated Consensus