Abstract:V1 neurons have been observed to respond more strongly to figure than background regions. Within a figure region, the responses are usually stronger near figure boundaries (the border effect), than further inside the boundaries. Sometimes the medial axes of the figures (e.g., the vertical midline of a vertical figure strip) induce secondary, intermediate, response peaks (the medial axis effect). Related is the physiologically elusive "cross-orientation facilitation", the observation that a cell's response to a grating patch can be facilitated by an orthogonally oriented grating in the surround. Higher center feedbacks have been suggested to cause these figure-ground effects. It has been shown, using a V1 model, that the causes could be intra-cortical interactions within V1 that serve pre-attentive visual segmentation, particularly, object boundary detection. Furthermore, whereas the border effect is robust, the figure-ground effects in the interior of a figure, in particular, the medial axis effect, are by-products of the border effect and are predicted to diminish to zero for larger figures. This model prediction (of the figure size dependence) was subsequently confirmed physiologically, and supported by findings that the response modulations by texture surround do not depend on feedbacks from V2. In addition, the model explains the "cross-orientation facilitation" as caused by a dis-inhibition, to the cell responding to the center of the central grating, by the background grating. Furthermore, the elusiveness of this phenomena was accounted for by the insight that it depends critically on the size of the figure grating. The model is applied to understand some figure-ground effects and segmentation in psychophysics: in particular, that contrast discrimination threshold is lower within and at the center of a closed contour than that in the background, and that a very briefly presented vernier target can perceptually shine through a subsequently presented large grating centered at the same location.

Hole Superiority Effect with 3D Figures Formed by Binocular Disparity

Body-centric and World-Centric Components of the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

Slant Perception in Near Space is Categorically Biased: Evidence for a Vertical Tendency

Connectedness Underlies the Underestimation of the Horizontal Vertical Illusion in L-shaped Configurations

The Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion Produced with Small Objects

Visual Complexity of Shapes: a Hierarchical Perceptual Learning Model

Early Computation of Contour Curvature and Part Structure: Evidence from Holes

Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Depth Compression Based on Mis-Scaling of Binocular Disparity May Contribute to Angular Expansion in Perceived Optical Slant.

The Perception of 2D Orientation is Categorically Biased

Shifts of spatial attention in perceived 3-D space.

The Salience of Absence: when a Hole is More Than the Sum of Its Parts

Method-dependent characteristics of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin measurements in the follow-up of alcoholics.

The Effect Of Attention Orienting On Stereopsis

The Effect of Spatial Structure on Binocular Contrast Perception.

Functional specialization in human dorsal pathway for stereoscopic depth processing

Binocular Disparity: Neural Mechanisms and Perceptual Learning

Mean orientation discrimination based on proximal stimuli

V1 mechanisms and some figure–ground and border effects

Weak overcomes strong in sensory integration: shading warps the disparity field

Interaction of disparity size and depth structure on perceived numerosity in a three-dimensional space