Proliferative potential and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer patients

Sarabjot Pabla,Jeffrey M. Conroy,Mary K. Nesline,Sean T. Glenn,Antonios Papanicolau-Sengos,Blake Burgher,Jacob Hagen,Vincent Giamo,Jonathan Andreas,Felicia L. Lenzo,Wang Yirong,Grace K. Dy,Edwin Yau,Amy Early,Hongbin Chen,Wiam Bshara,Katherine G. Madden,Keisuke Shirai,Konstantin Dragnev,Laura J. Tafe,Daniele Marin,Jason Zhu,Jeff Clarke,Matthew Labriola,Shannon McCall,Tian Zhang,Matthew Zibelman,Pooja Ghatalia,Isabel Araujo-Fernandez,Arun Singavi,Ben George,Andrew Craig MacKinnon,Jonathan Thompson,Rajbir Singh,Robin Jacob,Lynn Dressler,Mark Steciuk,Oliver Binns,Deepa Kasuganti,Neel Shah,Marc Ernstoff,Kunle Odunsi,Razelle Kurzrock,Mark Gardner,Lorenzo Galluzzi,Carl Morrison
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0506-3
IF: 12.469
2019-01-01
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Abstract:Background Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been linked to local immunosuppression independent of major ICI targets (e.g., PD-1). Clinical experience with response prediction based on PD-L1 expression suggests that other factors influence sensitivity to ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Tumor specimens from 120 NSCLC patients from 10 institutions were evaluated for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, and global proliferative profile by targeted RNA-seq. Results Cell proliferation, derived from the mean expression of 10 proliferation-associated genes (namely BUB1, CCNB2, CDK1, CDKN3, FOXM1, KIAA0101, MAD2L1, MELK, MKI67, and TOP2A) , was identified as a marker of response to ICIs in NSCLC. Poorly, moderately, and highly proliferative tumors were somewhat equally represented in NSCLC, with tumors with the highest PD-L1 expression being more frequently moderately proliferative as compared to lesser levels of PD-L1 expression. Proliferation status had an impact on survival in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. There was a significant survival advantage for moderately proliferative tumors compared to their combined highly/poorly counterparts ( p = 0.021). Moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors had a median survival of 14.6 months that was almost twice that of PD-L1 negative highly/poorly proliferative at 7.6 months ( p = 0.028). Median survival in moderately proliferative PD-L1 negative tumors at 12.6 months was comparable to that of highly/poorly proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors at 11.5 months, but in both instances less than that of moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors. Similar to survival, proliferation status has impact on disease control (DC) in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. Patients with moderately versus those with poorly or highly proliferative tumors have a superior DC rate when combined with any classification schema used to score PD-L1 as a positive result (i.e., TPS ≥ 50% or ≥ 1%), and best displayed by a DC rate for moderately proliferative tumors of no less than 40% for any classification of PD-L1 as a negative result. While there is an over representation of moderately proliferative tumors as PD-L1 expression increases this does not account for the improved survival or higher disease control rates seen in PD-L1 negative tumors. Conclusions Cell proliferation is potentially a new biomarker of response to ICIs in NSCLC and is applicable to PD-L1 negative tumors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?