Differential regulation of PD-L1 expression by immune and tumor cells in NSCLC and the response to treatment with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1)

Marcin Kowanetz,Wei Zou,Scott N Gettinger,Hartmut Koeppen,Mark Kockx,Peter Schmid,Edward E Kadel 3rd,Ignacio Wistuba,Jamie Chaft,Naiyer A Rizvi,David R Spigel,Alexander Spira,Fred R Hirsch,Victor Cohen,Dustin Smith,Zach Boyd,Natasha Miley,Susan Flynn,Vincent Leveque,David S Shames,Marcus Ballinger,Simonetta Mocci,Geetha Shankar,Roel Funke,Garret Hampton,Alan Sandler,Lukas Amler,Ira Mellman,Daniel S Chen,Priti S Hegde
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802166115
2018-10-23
Abstract:Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells (TCs) by immunohistochemistry is rapidly gaining importance as a diagnostic for the selection or stratification of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) most likely to respond to single-agent checkpoint inhibitors. However, at least two distinct patterns of PD-L1 expression have been observed with potential biological and clinical relevance in NSCLC: expression on TC or on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs). We investigated the molecular and cellular characteristics associated with PD-L1 expression in these distinct cell compartments in 4,549 cases of NSCLC. PD-L1 expression on IC was more prevalent and likely reflected IFN-γ-induced adaptive regulation accompanied by increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and effector T cells. High PD-L1 expression on TC, however, reflected an epigenetic dysregulation of the PD-L1 gene and was associated with a distinct histology described by poor immune infiltration, sclerotic/desmoplastic stroma, and mesenchymal molecular features. Importantly, durable clinical responses to atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) were observed in patients with tumors expressing high PD-L1 levels on either TC alone [40% objective response rate (ORR)] or IC alone (22% ORR). Thus, PD-L1 expression on TC or IC can independently attenuate anticancer immunity and emphasizes the functional importance of IC in regulating the antitumor T cell response.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?