Abstracts from the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting 2016
Guillaume Pouessel,Claire Claverie,Julien Labreuche,Jean-Marie Renaudin,Aimée Dorkenoo,Mireille Eb,Anne Moneret-Vautrin,Antoine Deschildre,Stephane Leteurtre,Linus Grabenhenrich,Margitta Worm,Sabine Dölle,Kathrin Scherer,Isidor Hutteger,Morten Christensen,Carsten Bindslev-Jensen,Charlotte Mortz,Esben Eller,Henrik Fomsgaard Kjaer,Leonor Carneiro-Leão,Jenny Badas,Alice Coimbra,Dikla Pivko Levy,Moshe Ben-Shoshan,Ayelet Rimon,Shira Benor,Nicolette J. T. Arends,Nikki Edelbroek,Hans de Groot,Joyce A. M. Emons,H. Kim A. Brand,Dirk Verhoeven,Leonieke N. van Veen,Nicolette W. de Jong,Geunwoong Noh,Eun Ha Jang,Mariona Pascal,Olga Dominguez,Mònica Piquer,Montserrat Alvaro,Rosa Jimenez-Feijoo,Jaime Lozano,Adriana Machinena,Maria del Mar Folqué,Maria Teresa Giner,Ana María Plaza,Paul Turner,Nandinee Patel,Marta Vazquez-Ortiz,Sarah Lindsley,Lucy Walker,Simon Rosenberg,Adriano Mari,Claudia Alessandri,Ivana Giangrieco,Lisa Tuppo,Chiara Rafaiani,Georg Mitterer,Michela Ciancamerla,Rosetta Ferrara,Maria Livia Bernardi,Danila Zennaro,Maurizio Tamburrini,Maria Antonetta Ciardiello,Christian Harwanegg,Antonio Fernandez,Regina Selb,Philippe Egenmann,Michelle Epstein,Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber,Frits Koning,Martinus Lovik,E. N. Clare Mills,Javier Moreno,Henk van Loveren,Jean-Michel Wal,Susanne Diesner,Cornelia Bergmayr,Barbara Pfitzner,Vera Elisabeth Assmann,Philipp Starkl,David Endesfelder,Thomas Eiwegger,Zsolt Szepfalusi,Heinz Fehrenbach,Erika Jensen-Jarolim,Anton Hartmann,Isabella Pali-Schöll,Eva Untersmayr,Soren Wille,Peter Meyer,Caroline Klingebiel,Jonas Lidholm,Angelica Ehrenberg,Jonas Östling,Isabelle Cleach,Jean-Louis Mège,Joana Vitte,Roberta Aina,Pawel Dubiela,Sabine Pfeifer,Merima Bublin,Christian Radauer,Piotr Humeniuk,Stefan Kabasser,Riccardo Asero,Gador Bogas,Francisca Gomez,Paloma Campo,Maria Salas,Inmaculada Doña,Esther Barrionuevo,Maria Auxiliadora Guerrero,Cristobalina Mayorga,Ana Prieto,Domingo Barber,Maria Jose Torres,Annette Jamin,Andrea Wangorsch,Barbara Ballmer,Stefan Vieths,Stephan Scheurer,Danijela Apostolovic,Jelena Mihailovic,Maja Krstic,Maria Starkhammar,Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic,Carl Hamsten,Marianne van Hage,Francine C. van Erp,Edward F. Knol,Hannah M. Kansen,Bo Pontoppidan,Yolanda Meijer,Cornelis K. van der Ent,André C. Knulst,Rebekah Sayers,Helen Brown,Adnan Custovic,Angela Simpson,Claire Mills,Juliane Schulz,Network for Online Registration of Anaphylaxis (NORA),Jaap Akkerdaas,Muriel Totis,Annabelle Capt,Corinne Herouet-Guicheney,Ronald van Ree,Tushar Banerjee,Antima Banerjee,Mathilde Claude,Grégory Bouchaud,Roberta Lupi,Laure Castan,Olivier Tranquet,Sandra Denery-Papini,Marie Bodinier,Chantal Brossard,Rosella De Poi,Elisa Gritti,Emiliano De Dominicis,Bert Popping,Patrizia Polverino de Laureto,Kati Palosuo,Anna Kaarina Kukkonen,Anna Pelkonen,Mika Mäkelä,Nanju Alice Lee,Johanna Rost,Sridevi Muralidharan,Dianne Campbell,Sam Mehr,Catherine Nock,Joseph Baumert,Steve Taylor,Carla Mastrorilli,Salvatore Tripodi,Carlo Caffarelli,Serena Perna,Andrea Di Rienzo Businco,Ifigenia Sfika,Arianna Dondi,Annamaria Bianchi,Carlotta Povesi Dascola,Giampaolo Ricci,Francesca Cipriani,Nunzia Maiello,Michele Miraglia del Giudice,Tullio Frediani,Simone Frediani,Francesco Macrì,Chiara Pistoletti,Iride Dello Iacono,Maria Francesca Patria,Elena Varin,Diego Peroni,Pasquale Comberiati,Loredana Chini,Viviana Moschese,Sandra Lucarelli,Roberto Bernardini,Giuseppe Pingitore,Umberto Pelosi,Roberta Olcese,Matteo Moretti,Anastasia Cirisano,Diego Faggian,Alessandro Travaglini,Mario Plebani,Maria Carmen Verga,Mauro Calvani,Paolo Giordani,Paolo Maria Matricardi,Noe Ontiveros,Francisco Cabrera-Chavez,Julie Galand,Etienne Beaudouin,Florence Pineau,Shinobu Sakai,Kayoko Matsunaga,Reiko Teshima,Colette Larré,Sandra Denery,Sebastian Tschirner,Valérie Trendelenburg,Gabriele Schulz,Bodo Niggemann,Kirsten Beyer,Youcef Bouferkas,Younes Belabbas,Djamel Saidi,Omar Kheroua,Kamel Eddine El Mecherfi,Malika Guendouz,Abir Haddi,Hanane Kaddouri,Luis Amaral,Ana Pereira,Susana Rodrigues,Mareen Datema,Laurian Jongejan,Michael Clausen,Andre Knulst,Nikolaos Papadopoulos,Marek Kowalski,Frédéric de Blay,Aeilko Zwinderman,Karin Hoffman-Sommergruber,Barbara Ballmer-Weber,Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas,Shan Deng,Jia Yin,Charlotte Eisenmann,Maria Nassiri,Rabea Reinert,Johanna P. M. van der Valk,Roy Gerth van Wijk,Yvonne Vergouwe,Ewout W. Steyerberg,Marit Reitsma,Harry J. Wichers,Huub F. J. Savelkoul,Berber Vlieg-Boerstra,Anthony E. J. Dubois,Fabrícia Carolino,Ana Rodolfo,Josefina Cernadas,Dasha Roa-Medellín,Ana Rodriguez-Fernandez,Joaquín Navarro,Vicente Albendiz,María Luisa Baeza,Sonsoles Intente-Herrero,Andrea Mikkelsen,Kirsten Mehlig,Lauren Lissner,Linda Verrill,Stefano Luccioli,Jolanda van Bilsen,Frieke Kuper,André Wolterbeek,Tanja Rouhani Rankouhi,Lars Verschuren,Hilde Cnossen,Prescilla Jeurink,Johan Garssen,Léon Knippels,Jossie Garthoff,Geert Houben,Winfried Leeman,M. Eleonore Pettersson,Afke M. M. Schins,Gerard H. Koppelman,Boudewjin J. Kollen,Svitlana Zubchenko,Sarah Kuntz,Pablo Mérida,Montserrat Álvaro,Monica Piquer,Carmen Riggioni,Juan Heber Castellanos,Rosa Jimenez,Melanie Cap,Elodie Drumez,Stéphanie Lejeune,Caroline Thumerelle,Clémence Mordacq,Véronique Nève,Sonia Ricò,Margherita Varini,Rita Nocerino,Linda Cosenza,Antonio Amoroso,Margherita Di Costanzo,Carmen Di Scala,Giorgio Bedogni,Roberto Berni Canani,Paul J. Turner,Paloma Poza-Guedes,Ruperto González-Pérez,Inmaculada Sánchez-Machín,Victor Matheu-Delgado,Erik Wambre,Anne-Sofie Ballegaard,Charlotte Madsen,Juliane Gregersen,Katrine Lindholm Bøgh,Philippe Aubert,Michel Neunlist,Antoine Magnan,Daniel Lozano-Ojalvo,Alba Pablos-Tanarro,Leticia Pérez-Rodríguez,Elena Molina,Rosina López-Fandiño,Akila Rekima,Patricia Macchiaverni,Mathilde Turfkruyer,Sebastien Holvoet,Lénaïck Dupuis,Nour Baiz,Isabella Annesi-Maesano,Annick Mercenier,Sophie Nutten,Valérie Verhasselt,Ines Mrakovcic-Sutic,Srdan Banac,Ivana Sutic,Zdenka Baricev-Novakovic,Ingrid Sutic,Valentino Pavisic,Rosa Muñoz-Cano,Teodoríkez Jiménez-Rodríguez,Daniel Corbacho,Jordi Roca-Ferrer,Joan Bartra,Aleksandar Bulog,Vladimir Micovic,Lidia Markiewicz,Agata Szymkiewicz,Anna Szyc,Barbara Wróblewska,Bryan M. Harvey,Lucien F. Harthoorn,A. Wesley Burks,Georgios Rentzos,Anna-Lena Bramstång Björk,Ulf Bengtsson,Colin Barber,Chrystyna Kalicinsky,Christine Breynaert,Lieve Coorevits,Cornelia Jansen,Erna Van Hoeyveld,Kristin Verbeke,Anne-Marie Kochuyt,Rik Schrijvers,Diana Deleanu,Adriana Muntean,Maria Konstantakopoulou,Maria Pasioti,Anastasia Papadopoulou,Anna Iliopoulou,Nikolaos Mikos,Evangelia Kompoti,Eunice Dias de Castro,Borja Bartalomé,Kok Loong Ue,Elizabeth Griffiths,Stephen Till,Kate Grimshaw,Graham Roberts,Anna Selby,Indre Butiene,Jose Ignacio Larco,Ruta Dubakiene,Ana Fiandor,Alessandro Fiocchi,Nikos Papadopoulos,Sigurveig Sigurdardottir,Aline Sprikkelman,Anne-Fleur Schoemaker,Paraskevi Xepapadaki,Thomas Keil,Zizi Cojocariu,Beatriz Secades Barbado,Vasti Iancu,Esozia Arroabarren,Marta Goñi Esarte,Miren Arteaga,Mayra Coutinho Andrade,Denise Borges,Jorge Kalil,Pedro Giavina Bianchi,Rosana Camara Agondi,Rinkesh Kumar Gupta,Akanksha Sharma,Kriti Gupta,Mukul Das,Premendra Dwivedi,Rusudan Karseladze,Liana Jorjoliani,Lali Saginadze,Mariam Tskhakaia,Katia Basello,Gabriele Piuri,Attilio Francesco Speciani,Michela Carola Speciani,Carla Camerotto,Francesco Zinno,Olga Pakholchuk,Svitlana Nedelska,Stefano Pattini,Maria Teresa Costantino,Silvia Peveri,Danilo Villalta,Eleonora Savi,Andrea Costanzi,Vera A. Revyakina,Marina A. Kiseleva,Elena D. Kuvshinova,Inna A. Larkova,Anton A. Shekhetov,Diana Silva,André Moreira,José Plácido,Hanneke van der Kleij,Esther van Twuijver,Robbert Sutorius,Pieter-Jan de Kam,Jenny van Odijk,Helen Lindqvist,Elin Lustig,Amyra Ali Azamar Jácome,Karla Leversia Borjas Aguilar,Miguel García Domínguez,David Alejandro Mendoza Hernández,Cristiano Caruso,Cono Casale,Gian Lodovico Rapaccini,Antonino Romano,Italo De Vitis,Renata R. Cocco,Carolina Aranda,Marcia C. Mallozi,Jackeline F. Motta,Lilian Moraes,Antonio Pastorino,Nelson Rosario,Ekaterini Goudouris,Arnaldo Porto,Neusa F. Wandalsen,Emanuel Sarinho,Flavio Sano,Dirceu Solé,Constantinos Pitsios,Maria Petrodimopoulou,Ekaterini Papadopoulou,Maria Passioti,Meropi Kontogianni,Nino Adamia,Ekaterina Khaleva,Ana Prieto del Prado,George Du Toit,Edyta Krzych,Urszula Samolinska-Zawisza,Konrad Furmanczyk,Aneta Tomaszewska,Filip Raciborski,Agnieszka Lipiec,Piotr Samel-Kowalik,Artur Walkiewicz,Jacek Borowicz,Boleslaw Samolinski,Aimee Lou Nano,Marysia Recto,Maria Luisa Somoza,Natalia Blanca López,Diana Pérez Alzate,Francisco Javier Ruano,Maria Isabel Garcimartín,Elisa Haroun,Maria Vázquez de la Torre,Antonia Rojas,Montserrat López Onieva,Gabriela Canto,Alexandra Rodrigues,Andreia Forno,António Jorge Cabral,Rute Gonçalves,Ilya Vorozhko,Tatyana Sentsova,Olga Chernyak,Svetlana Denisova,Lidia Ilènko,Valery Muhortnich,Caroline Zimmermann,Alexander Rohrbach,Faisal R. Bakhsh,Kollen Boudewijn,Anne-Marie Oomkes-Pilon,Dorien Van Ginkle,Mira Šilar,Anja Jeverica,Tina Vesel,Tadej Avčin,Peter Korošec,Johanna van der Valk,Irene Berends,Nicolette Arends,Maurits van Maaren,Harry Wichers,Joyce Emons,Anthony Dubois,Nicolette de Jong,Oksana Matsyura,Lesya Besh,Chung-Hsiung Huang,Tong-Rong Jan,Gary Stiefel,Jean Tratt,Kerrie Kirk,Fabricia Carolino,Stefania Arasi,Lucia Caminiti,Giuseppe Crisafulli,Chiara Fiamingo,Jlenia Fresta,Giovanni Pajno,Ben Remington,Astrid Kruizinga,W. Marty Blom,Joost Westerhout,Sabina Bijlsma,Joe Baumert,Mark Blankestijn,Henny Otten,Rob Klemans,Anouska D. Michelsen-Huisman,Harmieke van Os-Medendorp,Astrid G. Kruizinga,Astrid Versluis,Gert van Duijn,H. Mary-Lene de Zeeuw-Brouwer,Jacqueline J. M. Castenmiller,Hub P. J. M. Noteborn,Geert F. Houben,Kristian Bravin,David Luyt,Bushra Javed,Phil Couch,Christopher Munro,Phil Padfield,Matt Sperrin,Aideen Byrne,Lizalet Oosthuizen,Carina Kelleher,Fiona Ward,Niamh Brosnan,Graham King,Eva Corbet,Josué Alejandro Huertas Guzmán,Montserrat Bosque García,Oscar Asensio,Laura Valdesoiro Navarrete,Helena Larramona,Xavier Domingo Miró,Katarzyna Pyrz,Moira Austin,Yanne Boloh,Philip Couch,Deirdre Galloway,Pilar Hernandez,Jonathan O’B. Hourihane,Fiona Kenna,Barbara Majkowska-Wojciechowska,Lynne Regent,Marina Themisb,Sabine Schnadt,Aida Semic-Jusufagic,Audrey Dunn Galvin,Tiina Kauppila,Mikael Kuitunen,Nikolaos A. Kitsioulis,Nikolaos Douladiris,Sofia Kostoudi,Ioanna Manolaraki,Dimitris Mitsias,Emmanouil Manousakis,Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos,Rebecca Knibb,Jennifer Hammond,Richard Cooke,Jaakko Yrjänä,Anna-Maija Hanni,Päivi Vähäsarja,Oona Mustonen,Teija Dunder,Petri Kulmala,Eva Lasa,Carmen D’Amelio,Sara Martínez,Alejandro Joral,Gabriel Gastaminza,Maria Jose Goikoetxea,David C. A. Candy,Marleen T. J. Van Ampting,Manon M. Oude Nijhuis,Assad M. Butt,Diego G. Peroni,Adam T. Fox,Jan Knol,Louise J. Michaelis,Ines Padua,Patricia Padrao,Pedro Moreira,Renata Barros,Hanan Sharif,Manzoor Ahmed,Nehad Gomaa,Joris Mens,Koen Smit,Frans Timmermans,Tomaž Poredoš,Anja Koren Jeverica,Marjeta Sedmak,Evgen Benedik,Meta Accetto,Mirjana Zupančič,Glauce Yonamine,Gustavo Soldateli,Bruna Aquilante,Antonio Carlos Pastorino,Cleonir Lui de Moraes Beck,Andrea Keiko Gushken,Mayra de Barros Dorna,Cristiane Nunes dos Santos,Ana Paula Moschione Castro,Abdulhadi Al-Qahtani,Rand Arnaout,Agha Rehan Khaliq,Rashid Amin,Farrukh Sheikh,Jorge Alvarez,Marta Anda,Miriam Palacios,Montserrat De Prada,Carmen Ponce,Bianca Balbino,Riccardo Sibilano,Thomas Marichal,Nicolas Gaudenzio,Hajime Karasuyama,Pierre Bruhns,Mindy Tsai,Laurent L. Reber,Stephen J. Galli,Ana Reis Ferreira,Josefina R. Cernadas,Aida del Campo García,Sara Pereiro Fernández,Nerea Sarmiento Carrera,Fernando Bandrés Sánchez-Cruz,José Ramón Fernández Lorenzo,Stephanie Claus,Claudia Pföhler,Franziska Ruëff,Regina Treudler,Mercedes Escarrer Jaume,Agustin Madroñero,Maria Teresa Guerra Perez,Juan Carlos Julia,Charlotte Hands Plovdiv,Lee Gethings,Jim Langridge,Karine Adel-Patient,Hervé Bernard,Ivona Barcievic-Jones,Raditsa Sokolova,Rumyana Yankova,Mariya Ivanovska,Marianna Murdjeva,Tatyana Popova,Svetlan Dermendzhiev,Martin Karjalainen,Ulrike Lehnigk,Duncan Brown,Julie C. Locklear,Julie Locklear,Ioana Maris,Jonathan Hourihane,Cristina Ornelas,Joana Caiado,Manuel Branco Ferreira,Manuel Pereira-Barbosa,Yolanda Puente,Juan Carlos Daza,Francisco Javier Monteseirin,Natalia Ukleja-Sokolowska,Ewa Gawronska-Ukleja,Magdalena Zbikowska-Gotz,Zbigniew Bartuzi,Lukasz Sokolowski,Aine Adams,Bernard Mahon,Karen English,Nelly Gourdon-Dubois,Laetitia Sellam,Bruno Pereira,Elodie Michaud,Khaled Messaoudi,Bertrand Evrard,Jean-Luc Fauquert,Francisca Palomares,Gador Gomez,Maria Jose Rodriguez,Luisa Galindo,Ana Molina,Lorella Paparo,Maurizio Mennini,Rosita Aitoro,Adam Wawrzeńczyk,Michał Przybyszewski,Anna Wawrzeńczyk,Hulya Ercan Sarıcoban,Meltem Ugras,Zerrin Yalvac,Bertine M. J. Flokstra-de Blok,J. L. van der Velde,Andrea Vereda,Clara Ippolito,Amaranta Traversa,Daniela Adriano,Daniela Manila Bianchi,Silvia Gallina,Lucia Decastelli,Melina Makatsori,Anne Miles,Sonja Posega Devetak,Iztok Devetak,Soraya Ainad Tabet,Jeanette Fisker Trandbohus,Pernille Winther,Hans-Jørgen Malling,Kirsten Skamstrup Hansen,Lene Heise Garvey,Chia-Chi Wang,Yin-Hua Cheng,Chun-Wei Tung,Mariola Dietrich,Ingo Marenholz,Birgit Kalb,Sarah Grosche,Katharina Blümchen,Rupert Schlags,Mareike Price,Sylke Rietz,Jorge Esparza-Gordillo,Susanne Lau,Young-Ae Lee,Ali Almontasheri,Mohammad Al Bahkali,Sahar Elshorbagi,Abdullah Alfhaid,Mashary Altamimi,Eman Madbouly,Hassan Al-Dhekri,Rand K. Arnaout,Maria Basagaña,Sira Miquel,Borja Bartolomé,Bettina Brix,Stefanie Rohwer,Sandra Brandhoff,Alena Berger,Waltraud Suer,Alf Weimann,Cristina Bueno,Laura Martín-Pedraza,Sara Abián,Pablo San Segundo-Acosta,Juan Carlos López-Rodríguez,Rodrigo Barderas,Eva Batanero,Javier Cuesta-Herranz,María Teresa Villalba,Magna Correia,Filipe Benito-Garcia,Cristina Arêde,Susana Piedade,Mário Morais-Almeida,James Hindley,Ross Yarham,Anna Kuklinska-Pijanka,David Gillick,Karine Patient,Martin D. Chapman,Katrine L. Bøgh,Ana Miranda,Eugénia Matos,Anna Sokolova,Huan Rao,Ivona Baricevic-Jones,Frances Smith,Wentong Xue,Helga Magnusdottir,Anna G. Vidarsdottir,Sigrun Lund,Anders Blom Jensen,Bjorn R. Ludviksson,Reyna Simon,Robert Elfont,Sean Bennett,Robert Voyksner,Maria de Lurdes Torre,Songül Yürek,Margaretha A. Faber,Annick Bastiaensen,Evelyne Mangodt,Athina van Gasse,Ine Decuyper,Vito Sabato,Margo M. Hagendorens,Chris H. Bridts,Luc S. De Clerck,Didier Ebo,Susanne Schwarz,Mandy Ziegert,Saskia Albroscheit,Christian Schwager,Skadi Kull,Jochen Behrends,Niels Röckendorf,Frauke Schocker,Andreas Frey,Arne Homann,Wolf-Meinhard Becker,Uta Jappe,Nesrine Zaabat,Sylvia Osscini,Chantal Agabriel,Benoît Sterling,Ania Carsin,Valérie Liabeuf,Monica Maćków,Alina Zbróg,Monica Bronkowska,Justine Courtois,Romy Gadisseur,Catherine Bertholet,Pierre Lukas,Etienne Cavalier,Philippe Delahaut,Birgit Quinting,Margareta Brandt Gertmo,Ewa Ternesten Hasseus,Vladyslava Barzylovych,Júlio Oliveira,Luis F. Ensina,Carolina S. Aranda,Leire Dopazo,Rebeca Lopez,Raquel Perez,Laura Santos-Diez,Agurtzane Bilbao,Juan Miguel Garcia,Ignacio García Núñez,María Ángeles Algaba Mármol,María José Barasona Villarejo,José Antonio Bácter Martos,Marina Suárez Vergara,José María Ignacio García,Agata Michalska,Grzegorz Sergiejko,Robert Zacniewski,Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu,Cristina Deaconu,Mihaela Popescu,Roxana Silvia Bumbacea,Alkerta Ibranji,Elida Nikolla,Gjustina Loloci,Nanna Juel-Berg,Lau Fabricius Larsen,Lars Kjaergaard Poulsen,João Marcelino,Ricardo Prata,Ana Célia Costa,Fátima Duarte,Marta Neto,Jennifer Santos,Luís Câmara Pestana,Daniel Sampaio,Paola Minale,Paola Dignetti,Donatella Bignardi,Irena Nedelea,Florin-Dan Popescu,Mariana Vieru,Florin-Adrian Secureanu,Carmen Saviana Ganea,Miguel Vieira,José Pedro Moreira Silva,Timothy Watts,Sophia Watts,Marta Lomikovska,Marina Peredelskaya,Natalia Nenasheva,Ivana Filipovic,Zorica Zivkovic,Djordje Filipovic,Jennette Higgs,Amena Warner,Carla Jones
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-017-0142-2
2017-01-01
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Abstract:ORAL ABSTRACT SESSION 1: Food allergens • AnaphylaxisOP01 Fatal anaphylaxis is decreasing in France: analysis of national data, 1979–2011Guillaume Pouessel1,2,3, Claire Claverie4, Julien Labreuche5, Jean-Marie Renaudin3,6, Aimée Dorkenoo4, Mireille Eb7, Anne Moneret-Vautrin6, Antoine Deschildre2,3, Stephane Leteurtre4 1Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, Roubaix, France; 2Division of Pulmonology and Allergology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Children's Hospital, Lille, France; 3Allergy Vigilance Network, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France; 4Université Lille 2, CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé Publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins, Lille, France; 5Biostatistic Unit, Maison Régionale de la Recherche Clinique, CHRU Lille, Lille, France; 6Department of Allergology, Emile Durkheim Hospital, Epinal, France; 7Centre d'Epidémiologie sur les Causes Médicales de Décès INSERM, CHU de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Correspondence: Guillaume Pouessel - guillaume.pouessel@gmail.com Clinical and Translational Allergy 2017, 7(Suppl 1):OP01 Introduction: Incidence of anaphylaxis is increasing. Data regarding anaphylaxis mortality are limited, but conflicting. Our objective was to document anaphylaxis mortality rate (deaths per million population), time trends and specificities according to triggers (iatrogenic, venom, food, unknown), age groups, sex and geographical regions (North and South) in France, between 1979 and 2011. Methods: Data were obtained (1) from database of the National Mortality Center (CEPIDC) to collect cases in which anaphylaxis was included as a cause of death, sex, age, and geographic region of death, (2) from the database of the National Institute for Economical and Statistical studies (INSEE) to define the referent populations. We used a multivariable log-linear Poisson regression model to assess the impact of time period, age, sex and geographic region on anaphylaxis deaths. Results: During the period study, 1603 deaths were collected: 1564 in adults and 39 in children (age <18 year). The overall prevalence of anaphylaxis fatalities was 0.84 per million population (95% IC 0.80–0.88), ranging from 0.08 per million (95% IC 0.05–0.10) in pediatric population to 1.12 per million (95% CI 1.06 to 1.17) in adult population. Annual percentage change for case fatality rate was −2.0% (95% CI −2.5 to −1.5; p < 10−4) indicating a decrease in case fatality rate during the study period. Anaphylaxis fatality rate was higher in men (1.08 per million [95% IC 1.00 1.16] than women (0.86 per million [95% IC 0.80–0.92]) (p < 10−4). Triggers of anaphylaxis fatalities were iatrogenic (63%), mostly drugs, venom (14%) and food (0.6%). Unspecified anaphylaxis was frequent (23%). The highest rate was in persons aged >70 years (3.50 per million population per year [95% IC 3.25–3.76]) and the lowest in the pediatric population (p < 10−4). Only venom-induced mortality rate was higher in South of France (0.16 per million [95% IC 0.13–0.19]) compared with the North (0.11 per million [95% IC 0.09–0.13]) (p = 0.004). Only 8 food-induced fatalities were recorded (age <35 years in 7 cases). Conclusion: Overall anaphylaxis mortality rate is decreasing over the three last decades in France. We confirm that iatrogenic causes are the most frequent causes. Older age and male sex are risk factors of fatal anaphylaxis of any cause except for food-induced anaphylaxis.OP02 Diagnostic workup after severe anaphylaxisLinus Grabenhenrich1, Margitta Worm1, Sabine Dölle1, Kathrin Scherer2, Isidor Hutteger3 1Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 3Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria Correspondence: Linus Grabenhenrich - linus.grabenhenrich@charite.de Clinical and Translational Allergy 2017, 7(Suppl 1):OP02 Introduction: After a severe anaphylactic reaction, a diagnostic workup is recommended to confirm or rule out the elicitor(s) in question. The type of diagnostic chosen is usually based on the elicitor and severity of the reaction and might follow local experiences. We aimed to describe elicitor-specific diagnostic habits in the workup of severe anaphylaxis, comparing European countries. Methods: The Network for Online Registration of Anaphylaxis (NORA) collected details about elicitors, symptoms and severity, treatment and the diagnostic workup of patients who experienced at least one episode of severe anaphylaxis, as documented within medical records of participating tertiary referral centres. Results: Between June 2011 and April 2016, the registry collected data for 6465 cases of severe anaphylaxis, 74% of which reported to know the elicitor, with a remaining 20% having only a suspicion and 6% cases of idiopathic anaphylaxis. The allergen was known and confirmed by a diagnostic test in 4410 (92% of known elicitors). Of these, 68% had a reaction to this allergen for the first time, and 32% reported at least one earlier reaction to the same allergen. In first-time reactors (n = 3001) 7% reported that the allergen was confirming by a diagnostic test already before this reaction, for food 14%, insects 3%, drugs 2%, and 80% for SIT-induced anaphylaxis. Of cases with recurrent anaphylaxis (n = 1409), 30% had a test confirming the allergen before the reported reaction, for food 44%, insects 16%, drugs 18%, and 91% for SIT-induced anaphylaxis. Of all diagnostically confirmed cases of food-induced anaphylaxis (n = 1555), 78% were assessed by a skin test (SPT, positive in 93%), 90% by specific IgE (sIgE, 94% positive), 27% tryptase (7% positive), and 13% underwent an oral food challenge (positive in 88%). Patients with anaphylaxis caused by drugs had the following tests (positives of these): SPT 88% (49%), sIgE 31% (46%), tryptase 48% (11%), and provocation 19% (68%). For reactions against insect venom: SPT 79% (84%), sIgE 98% (97%), and tryptase 93 (8%). Irrespective of the elicitor, SPTs were performed more often in Austria, Ireland and Greece (92, 96, and 99%, respectively), and less often in Italy (64%). Tryptase was almost never measured in Ireland, Greece and France, whereas determination of specific IgE was carried out similarly between European countries. Conclusion: The choice of diagnostic measure depended on the elicitor and varied by country. Especially the assessment of tryptase is handled very differently between allergens in question and countries. These differences may indicate aspects of the diagnostic workup with a certain degree of ambiguity, which might benefit from further harmonization.OP03 Primary sensitisation versus co-sensitisation to hydrolysed wheat proteinMorten Christensen, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Charlotte MortzDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark Correspondence: Morten J. Christensen - morten.junker.christensen@rsyd.dk Clinical and Translational Allergy 2017, 7(Suppl 1):OP03 Introduction: Wheat protein is responsible for various phenotypes of allergic diseases. More recently an increased number of immediate type 1 allergic reactions to hydrolyzed wheat proteins (HWP) have been reported.The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical profile and evaluate patients with a case-history of anaphylaxis related to ingestion of a product containing HWP. Furthermore, to describe patients with other types of wheat allergy co-sensitized for HWP. Methods: From May 2010 to August 2015 we investigated 56 patients (31 female, 25 male, mean age 39.0 years [1.5–77.2]) sensitized to commercialized HWP, either by specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) (ThermoFischer, Uppsala, Sweden) and/or skin prick test (SPT). Based upon case-history patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) allergic reaction to ingestion of a HWP containing product (n = 9) (2) ingestion of a wheat product; WIA (n = 19), (3) ingestion of a wheat product in combination with exercise; WDEIA (n = 28). All patients were orally challenged with the incriminated food. Results: The total positive rate of sIgE to HWP was 47/56 (83.9%), SPT 35/42 (83.3%) and BHR 22/42 (52.3%). Fourteen patients were triple positive to commercialized HWP of whom 7/9 patients in the HWP group. In total 9 (16%) patients were identified with a case-history of anaphylaxis related to a HWP containing product. Seven of 9 had a case-history to the same hydrolyzed wheat product (AMO Letbagt®). The average serum level of HWP-sIgE and the SPT were higher in patients with a case-history of HWP, respectively (median 5.3 kU/L ±6.8) (p < 0.05) and (median 6.0 mm ±4.1) (p < 0.05) compared to the WIA and WDEIA groups. A complete negative pattern was determined with specific wheat proteins normally associated with other phenotypes of wheat allergy, omega-5 gliadin (f416), gliadin (f98), High Molecular Weight (Tri a 26) and α-amylase trypsin inhibitor (Tri a 30). Basophil histamine release (BHR) for HWP was extremely positive in 8/9 HWP patients with activity retained to dilutions up to 10−12. The most striking finding was the ultrahigh sensitivity of BHR in diagnosing allergy to HWP. It is, however, interesting, that the HWP patient tolerates ingestion of unmodified wheat. Conclusion: Reactivity to HWP seems to be confined to patients specifically sensitized to this heterogeneous group of products without concomitant allergy to normal wheat. Irrelevant co-sensitization is also seen in classical wheat allergy.OP04 Actual adrenalin treatment in a specialised clinical setting, compared to administration as recommended by a built-in algorithm in a severity scoring instrument in food allergyEsben Eller, Henrik Fomsgaard Kjaer, Charlotte Mortz, Carsten Bindslev-JensenOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark Correspondence: Esben Eller - esben.eller@rsyd.dk Clinical and Translational Allergy 2017, 7(Suppl 1):OP04 Introduction: One of the most used severity scoring instruments, the Sampson 1–5, includes a built-in algorithm indicating symptoms which necessitate adrenalin administration. These include grade 5 anaphylactic symptoms, but also grade 3 and 4 such as laryngeal "puritus, tightness, or dysphagia" and lower respiratory symptoms such as "wheezing, dyspnea or cyanosis". Our aim was to compare the recommended adrenalin administration with the actual administration in our clinic in relation to the underlying eliciting symptom. Methods: Data from 2382 positive food challenges (mean age 11.6 years [range: 0.5–74.1y]) performed between Jan. 2000 and Dec. 2015 at the Allergy Centre, Odense, Denmark were included, and severity of reactions was assessed using the Sampson 1–5 severity instrument. All patients were evaluated by experienced specialists during challenge. Actual medications administered during the challenges, i.e. adrenalin, β2-agonist, corticosteroid, or antihistamine were compared with recommended adrenalin treatment according to the algorithm in Sampson 1–5. Results: Out of 346 challenges scored as grade 4 anaphylaxis, 296 were terminated due to respiratory symptoms requiring adrenalin according to Sampson 1–5, i.e. "barky cough, hoarseness, difficulty swallowing" (laryngeal, n = 79), "wheezing, dyspnea, cyanosis" (lower resp. n = 181) or both (n = 36). Nine of the 115 patients with laryngeal symptoms were treated with adrenalin, all due to inspiratory stridor. No patients with lower respiratory symptoms received adrenalin, but the majority were treated with β2 agonists (188/217), whereas in 30 challenges, symptoms disappeared without treatment or only antihistamine for concomitant urticaria were used. Patients solely with laryngeal symptoms received β2-agonists in 16 challenges, but the majority of them (54/79) received no treatment or only antihistamine. The 36 patients with both laryngeal and lower respiratory symptoms were treated in same manner as patients with only lower respiratory symptoms, i.e. β2 agonist for their bronchial wheeze or asthma. Grade 5 anaphylaxis was seen in 11 challenges, 1 caused by non-adrenalin recommended "loss of bowel control". In the remaining 10 cases, 7 patients were treated with adrenalin, either due to "hypotension < 90 mm Hg" (n = 3) or "unconsciousness" (n = 4). Three children fainted, but regained consciousness without administration of adrenalin. Grade 5 anaphylaxis should almost always be treated with adrenalin, whereas adrenalin only was administrated to inspiratory stridor and not to bronchial expiratory wheeze or asthma in grade 4 anaphylaxis. Respiratory signs were instead medicated according to symptoms, i.e. with β2-agonist to relieve bronchoconstriction. All patients were evaluated by experienced specialists, and therefore this practice should be addressed with care in less experienced settings. Conclusion: Inspiratory stridor was the main cause of adrenalin treatment in grade 4 anaphylaxis, whereas the majority of lower respiratory symptoms were treated with inhalant β2 agonists, thereby overcoming the need for adrenalin. This needs to be considered in future treatment recommendations.OP05 Do patients know how to use adrenaline auto-injectors?Leonor Carneiro-Leão†, Jenny Badas†, Luís Amaral, Alice CoimbraServiço de Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal †The first two authors have equal contribution. Correspondence: Leonor Carneiro-Leão - leonorcarneiroleao@gmail.com Clinical and Translational Allergy 2017, 7(Suppl 1):OP05 Introduction: Adrenaline auto-injectors (AAI) are the first line treatment for anaphylaxis in community settings. Two are currently available in Portugal (Anapen® and Epipen®).Our aim was to evaluate patient's ability to properly use AAIs; impact of device switching and patients' preferences. Methods: Patients who had been prescribed an AAI in our department were invited to demonstrate correct technique of AAI by simulating adrenaline administration using training devices. First, simulation with their prescribed AAI; second, evaluation of device switching, without any previous training, by simulating injection with a different AAI (Epipen® or Anapen®, as well as Emerade®-currently unavailable in Portugal). Finally, they were asked which device they liked the best. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled, 16 (50%) females, with a mean (SD) age of 42.9 (±15.8) years; 18 (56%) with hymenoptera venom allergy and 14 (44%) food allergy. Anapen® was prescribed to 15 (47%) and Epipen® to 17 (53%). Six did not acquire any AAI; 21 (66%) admitted carrying it on a daily basis. Eleven (34%) could not demonstrate successful adrenaline administration with their prescribed AAI, 5 with Anapen® and 6 with Epipen®. Nine (60%) of the 15 patients who were prescribed an Anapen® could not administer adrenaline with an Epipen®; 11 (65%) of the 17 with a prescribed Epipen® were unable to use an Anapen®. Only 2 (6%) were incapable of properly managing an Emerade®. The most common error in patients switching from Epipen® to Anapen® was not removing the needle cap (9 patients). In the group switching Anapen® to Epipen®, the most common misuse was not massaging the injection site (10 patients); 6 tried to remove the orange tip as if it was a cap. The preferred AAI was Emerade® in 20 (63%) and Epipen® in 12 (37%). Conclusions: Patients at-risk for anaphylaxis are provided with portable auto-injectors, educated and trained on their use. One-third of the patients did not always carry them. More than one-third was unable to successfully demonstrate adrenaline administration with their prescribed AAI. Almost two-thirds failed to simulate injection when switched to the alternative one available in Portugal without any training. Design appears to play a role in a successful switch since 94% of the patients changing from either Anapen® or Epipen® to Emerade® were able to correctly use it. It was also the overall preferred auto-injector. These emergency medical devices should be patient friendly.OP06 Incidence, clinical features, triggers and management of anaphylaxis in the Pediatric Emergency Department of the Tel Aviv Medical CenterDikla Pivko Levy1, Moshe Ben-Shoshan2, Ayelet Rimon1, Shira Benor1 1Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; 2Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal QC, Canada Correspondence: Dikla Pivko Levy - diklapivko@gmail.com Clinical and Translational Allergy 2017, 7(Suppl 1):OP06 Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a severe, life threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis is not always easy to make in the pediatric emergency department (ED) setting. Therefore, children are often dangerously underdiagnosed and undertreated. There is sparse information on the incidence and triggers of anaphylaxis in Israel.Our objective was to assess the true incidence of anaphylaxis treated in the Pediatric ED, to identify triggers associated with anaphylaxis, to describe the management of anaphylactic reactions and identify potential gaps in diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A retrospective chart review of cases presenting to the Pediatric ED of the Dana-Dweck Children's hospital, at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center between January 1st 2013 to December 31th 2014, with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis or allergic reaction. The clinical features, causative agents, treatment administered and recommendations at discharge were recorded. Results: During the study period, there were a total of 56,596 visits to the ED. 437 patients were diagnosed with an allergic or anaphylactic reaction. Of these 59 (13.5%) met the diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis, but only 22 were given the correct diagnosis. The mean age of presentation was 6.9 years, with a male predominance of 66%. Food was the most common causative agent (78%). Specifically, exposure to treenuts (28% (and cow milk (24%) were responsible for a majority of the cases. The majority of children (78% (had known food allergies and presented with breathing difficulties (64%), followed by urticaria (62%). Twenty children (37.7%) were treated with IM adrenaline prior to ED arrival and only fifteen (26%) were treated with IM adrenaline in the ED. Most of the children (86%) were discharged home. Almost 30% were discharged without a prescription to an automated Adrenaline injector. Conclusion: The rate of anaphylaxis in the study period was 0.1% of all visits to the pediatric ED. Most cases of anaphylaxis were underdiagnosed. As a result, treatment guidelines regarding the use of IM Adrenalin were not always followed and many children were discharged without a prescription for an adrenaline auto-injector.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Test Panel of Hidden Allergens for "Idiopathic Anaphylaxis" Reveals Wheat Allergy Dependent on Augmentation Factors as Common Final Diagnosis
Nida Oztop,Martin Valentin Vitus,Valentina Faihs,Claudia Kugler,Tilo Biedermann,Knut Brockow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.037
2024-05-29
Abstract:Background: Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) is an unresolved concern. Hidden allergens may be relevant in IA and in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity (NSAID-HS). Objective: To identify hidden elicitors for IA and NSAID-HS by a skin prick test (SPT) (13 allergens) and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) panel (12 allergens) and to determine the value of each tested allergen. Methods: We retrospectively included all patients from 2018 to 2021 referred with a suspicion of IA or NSAID-HS by history in whom SPT and/or sIgE to allergens of the IA panel were performed. Patient characteristics from patients' records included comorbidities, history and symptoms of anaphylaxis, serum baseline tryptase level, total IgE level, SPT, sIgE, challenge results, and final diagnoses. Results: A total of 134 patients (77 female, mean age 39.7 ± 14.6 years) were included. Median serum baseline tryptase and total IgE levels were 4.23 μg/L and 133.5 kU/L, respectively. Allergologic workup with the IA panel resulted in positive SPT and sIgE in 61 (47%) and 66 (60%) patients, respectively. In those, confirmation or exclusion of allergy, mostly by challenge, led to a definitive diagnosis in 61 of 134 patients (46%). Skin prick test was most frequently positive to gluten (22.4%) and sIgE to ω5-gliadin (21.6%), which correlated with the history (r = 0.310, P < .001; and r = 0.407, P < .001, respectively). In 28 of 134 patients (21%) with initially suspected IA or NSAID-HS, challenges confirmed occult food allergy in which wheat allergy dependent on augmentation factors was the most frequent cause of anaphylaxis (19%). Conclusions: Wheat allergy dependent on augmentation factors should be considered in all patients with anaphylaxis of unknown cause or after NSAID intake.
-
Detection of Sensitization Profiles with Cellular In Vitro Tests in Wheat Allergy Dependent on Augmentation Factors (WALDA)
Valentina Faihs,Viktoria Schmalhofer,Claudia Kugler,Rebekka K. Bent,Katharina A. Scherf,Barbara Lexhaller,Charlotte G. Mortz,Carsten Bindslev-Jensen,Tilo Biedermann,Per S. Skov,Bernadette Eberlein,Knut Brockow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073574
IF: 5.6
2024-03-23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Abstract:Wheat allergy dependent on augmentation factors (WALDA) is the most common gluten allergy in adults. IgE-mediated sensitizations are directed towards ω5-gliadin but also to other wheat allergens. The value of the different in vitro cellular tests, namely the basophil activation test (BAT) and the active (aBHRA) and passive basophil histamine-release assays (pBHRA), in the detection of sensitization profiles beyond ω5-gliadin has not been compared. Therefore, 13 patients with challenge-confirmed, ω5-gliadin-positive WALDA and 11 healthy controls were enrolled. Specific IgE (sIgE), skin prick tests, BATs, aBHRA, and pBHRA were performed with allergen test solutions derived from wheat and other cereals, and results were analyzed and compared. This study reveals a distinct and highly individual reactivity of ω5-gliadin-positive WALDA patients to a range of wheat allergens beyond ω5-gliadin in cellular in vitro tests and SPT. In the BAT, for all tested allergens (gluten, high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits, α-amylase/trypsin inhibitors (ATIs), alcohol-free wheat beer, hydrolyzed wheat proteins (HWPs), rye gluten and secalins), basophil activation in patients was significantly higher than in controls (p = 0.004–p < 0.001). Similarly, significant histamine release was detected in the aBHRA for all test substances, exceeding the cut-off of 10 ng/mL in all tested allergens in 50% of patients. The dependency of tests on sIgE levels against ω5-gliadin differed; in the pBHRA, histamine release to any test substances could only be detected in patients with sIgE against ω5-gliadin ≥ 7.7 kU/L, whereas aBHRA also showed high reactivity in less sensitized patients. In most patients, reactivity to HWPs, ATIs, and rye allergens was observed. Additionally, alcohol-free wheat beer was first described as a promising test substance in ω5-gliadin-positive WALDA. Thus, BAT and aBHRA are valuable tools for the identification of sensitization profiles in WALDA.
biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, multidisciplinary
-
Favorable Prognosis of Wheat Allergy in Adults
J Scibilia,M Rossi Carlo,M Losappio Laura,C Mirone,L Farioli,V Pravettoni,E A Pastorello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.0296
Abstract:Background and objective: Wheat ingestion can lead to disorders such as IgE-mediated food allergy and wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), both of which are associated with impaired quality of life and significant morbidity. Allergy to wheat is relatively benign in children, although its natural history in adults is still unknown. Objective: We used placebo-controlled challenge to evaluate the natural history of wheat hypersensitivity in atopic patients with adultonset wheat allergy. Methods: We enrolled 13 patients from an initial cohort of adult patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy (mean age, 40 years). After diagnosis, the patients observed a wheat-free diet and were followed as outpatients for 5 years to evaluate wheat exposure. Wheat-IgEtiters were determined at the end of follow-up, and a second wheat-challenge was performed. Results: Ten out of 13 patients took part in the study. The mean period of wheat avoidance was 4.2 years. Three patients had spontaneously reintroduced wheat before the second evaluation, after a mean (IQR) of 28 (18-36) months, with only mild gastrointestinal discomfort at reintroduction. At the end of follow-up, 9 of the 10 patients were wheat-tolerant. Two patients had a history of WDEIA. We observed a reduction in IgE levels, with median (IQR) IgE falling from 2.77 (0.35-100) kU/L at diagnosis to 0.88 (0.1-20.8) kU/L. The association between IgE and a negative challenge result was not statistically significant. Conclusion: IgE-mediated wheat allergy in adults is benign and represents a temporary break in gastrointestinal tolerance. Future studies may improve our knowledge of wheat allergens, routes of and factors leading to sensitization, and prognostic biomarkers.
-
Clinical features and outcomes of patients with wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis: a retrospective study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-022-00702-1
2022-07-05
Abstract:Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) is a serious and potentially life-threatening form of wheat allergy. Further episodes can only be prevented by avoiding wheat ingestion or avoiding exercise after wheat intake. Anaphylaxis may recur in some patients post-diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and management/outcomes of WDEIA in China. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics, and laboratory testing of 197 patients with WDEIA. After diagnosis, the patients were followed up as outpatients to evaluate dietary/exercise choice and clinical outcomes. Among the 197 WDEIA patients (median age, 37 years), 53.8% were male and 28.4% had other allergic disorders. The median duration of anaphylaxis before diagnosis was 16 months. Significant delays in diagnosis (> 1 years) were recorded in 52.7% of the patients, which has not decreased by years (P = 0.064). Exercise (83.8%), alcohol (12.2%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (7.1%) were the most common cofactors. The most common clinical features were urticaria (100%), loss of consciousness (82.7%), dyspnea (50.8%), and hypotension (47.2%). Of the 197 eligible patients, 155 responded (78.7%), and 124 (80.0%) of which had no anaphylaxis post-diagnosis. A wheat-free diet prevented future anaphylaxis in 91.7% of the patients, followed by the avoidance of wheat combined with exercise (87%) and reduced wheat intake combined with exercise avoidance (80.5%). The diagnosis of WDEIA is frequently delayed. Therefore, when patients present with unexplained anaphylaxis, the possibility of WDEIA should be considered. A wheat-free diet or avoiding wheat combined with exercise or reduced wheat combined with exercise avoidance helps to significantly reduce the onset of future anaphylaxis. However, approximately one-fifth of patients continue to experience anaphylaxis post-diagnosis. Thus, these patients must always carry epinephrine autoinjectors.
-
Anaphylaxis in a country where Asia and Europe meet: Evaluation according to World Allergy Organization (WAO) and European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) diagnostic criteria
İsmet Bulut,Zeynep Yegin Katran,Dilek Yavuz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100962
IF: 5.516
2024-09-13
World Allergy Organization Journal
Abstract:Background Anaphylaxis is an acute-onset, life-threatening clinical emergency involving more than one system. The World Allergy Organization (WAO) published anaphylaxis guidelines in 2020. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) published anaphylaxis guidelines in 2021 and reviewed the diagnosis of anaphylaxis, risk factors, comorbid diseases, treatment management, and prevention studies. In this study, clinical features, demographic characteristics, risk factors, treatment management, and evaluations according to EAACI and WAO diagnostic criteria were analysed in patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis. In this way, it was aimed to provide a perspective on the diagnosis, etiology, and treatment management in patients with anaphylaxis and to open a window for new studies. Methods We retrospectively analysed the data recording system of patients who were evaluated with a history of systemic allergic reaction in the Allergy and Immunology outpatient clinic of our tertiary referral hospital in a ninety-month period between January 2016 and June 2023. The total number of patients admitted to our Allergy and Immunology Clinic between January 2016 and June 2023 was 14,9425. Among these patients, 1032 patients were evaluated in the outpatient clinic according to the ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) coding system and diagnosed as T78.2 Anaphylaxis by Allergy and Immunology Specialist. Each patient file was re-evaluated by the authors of the study and 689 eligible patients were included. Results Included in the study were 689 patients. The mean age of the patients was 46.2 ± 14.2 (35–57) years. 64.4% (n = 444) of the patients were female. Venom, drugs, and food were the 3 leading causes of anaphylaxis. In our study, younger age was determined as a statistically significant risk factor for food-induced anaphylaxis, female gender for drug-induced anaphylaxis and male gender for venom-induced anaphylaxis. (p < 0.001) If the cause of anaphylaxis can be identified, such as venom, drug or food, the frequency of anaphylaxis decreases statistically significantly compared to idiopathic anaphylaxis. (p < 0.001) The rate of acute hypotension, bronchospasm, or laryngeal involvement without skin involvement according to WAO and the rate of WAO severity classification grade 5 were significantly higher in patients who developed anaphylaxis due to venom compared to other patients (p < 0.001). The rate of Grade 3 in the EAACI classification was significantly higher in patients who developed anaphylaxis due to venom compared to other cases (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our study was conducted in a city such as Istanbul, which connects both Asian and European continents. Moreover, it is important because it was conducted in a centre with the highest number of Allergy and Immunology outpatients per year in our country. It is important because it gives the prevalence of anaphylaxis and emphasises the risk factors for each allergen separately.
immunology,allergy
-
Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis in Chinese people: a clinical research on 33 cases with antigenic analysis of wheat proteins
Y-q Zhu,D-q Wang,B. Liu,Y. Hu,Y-y Shen,J-h Xu,H. Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14035
2020-01-01
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
Abstract:Background Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) is a severe allergic condition in which wheat ingestion together followed by physical exercise induces anaphylaxis. For patients with WDEIA, omega-5 gliadin is considered to be one of the major allergens. Aim To analyse the clinical features and allergen spectrum of WDEIA and to investigate the relationship between WDEIA and serum levels of platelet-activating factor (PAF), interleukin (IL)-9 and IL-33. Methods Medical histories and conditions of WDEIA cases were collected and summarized, with allergen tests of wheat proteins measured at the same visit. Of the 33 patients enrolled, 13 also had serum levels of PAF, IL-9 and IL-33 measured. The healthy control (HC) group consisted of 13 healthy individuals, who also underwent both the wheat-protein allergen tests and the inflammatory-mediator tests. Results All patients experienced severe allergic reaction during exercise after wheat ingestion. Manifestations of WDEIA included facial oedema, generalized urticaria and respiratory symptoms. Unconsciousness was also observed in 21 cases. In the patient group, 57.6% were confirmed as hypersensitive to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), while 54.5% were allergic to omega-5 gliadin. PAF concentration was significantly higher in patients with WDEIA compared with HCs, whereas there was no significant difference in IL-9 or IL-33 between the two groups. Conclusions WDEIA is a rare type of anaphylaxis. GAPDH and omega-5 gliadin may be the most common allergy-causing wheat proteins for Chinese people. PAF may be associated with the onset and development of WDEIA.
-
Food Allergy: Definitions, Prevalence, Diagnosis and Therapy
Ronald van Ree,Lars K Poulsen,Gary Wk Wong,Barbara K Ballmer-Weber,Zhongshan Gao,Xudong Jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2015.01.020
2015-01-01
Abstract:Food allergy is phenotypically an extremely heterogeneous group of diseases affecting multiple organs,sometimes in an isolated way,sometimes simultaneously,with the severity of reactions ranging from mild and local to full-blown anaphylaxis.Mechanistically,it is defined as a Th2-driven immune disorder in which food-specific IgE antibodies are at the basis of immediate-type adverse reactions.The sites of sensitization and symptoms do not necessarily overlap.Food allergy,which is the theme of this paper,is often confused with other adverse reactions to food of both animmune (e.g.,celiac disease) and nonimmune (e.g.,lactose intolerance) nature.To reliably diagnose food allergy,a careful history (immediatetype reactions) needs to be complemented with demonstration of specific IgE (immune mechanism) and confirmed by an oral challenge.Co-factors such as exercise,medication,and alcohol may help trigger food allergy and further complicate accurate diagnosis.Where food extract-based diagnostic tests are poorly correlated to symptom severity,new generation molecular diagnostics that measure IgE against individual food allergens provide clinicians and patients with more reliable symptom severity risk profiles.Molecular diagnostics also support establishing whether food sensitization originates directly from exposure to food or indirectly (cross-reactivity) from pollen sensitization.Epidemiological surveys have indicated that allergy to peach primarily originates from peach consumption in Europe,whereas in China it is the result of primary sensitization to mugwort pollen,in both cases mediated by an allergen molecule from the same family.Epidemiological surveys give insight into the etiology of food allergy,the size of the problem (prevalence),and the risk factors involved,which together support evidence-based strategies for prevention.Over the past decade,food allergy has increased in the affluent world.Economic growth and urbanization in upcoming economies are likewise expected to lead to increased prevalence of food allergies,sometimes to different foods due to dietary habits.Molecular allergology and biotechnology now offer the possibility to combat the increasing burden of food allergy by developing safe immunotherapies for food allergy,using hypoallergenic mutant recombinant molecules.The first clinical trials to evaluate such approaches are underway.Last but not least,the identification and clinical risk characterization of a more and more complete list of food allergens additionally provides the allergenicity risk assessment of genetically modified foods a firmer basis.
-
Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: Data From the European Anaphylaxis Registry
Sabine Dölle-Bierke,Veronika Höfer,Wojciech Francuzik,Anatol-Fiete Näher,Maria Beatrice Bilo,Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz,Lucila C Lopes de Oliveira,Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas,Blanca E García,Karin Hartmann,Uta Jappe,Alice Köhli,Lars Lange,Ioana Maris,Tihomir Bogdanov Mustakov,Katja Nemat,Hagen Ott,Nikolaos G Papadopoulos,Claudia Pföhler,Franziska Ruëff,Dominique Sabouraud-Leclerc,Thomas Spindler,Philippe Stock,Regina Treudler,Christian Vogelberg,Nicola Wagner,Margitta Worm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.026
Abstract:Background: Food is one of the most common elicitors of anaphylaxis, with an increasing incidence over recent years. Objectives: To characterize elicitor-specific phenotypes and identify factors enhancing the risk or severity of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA). Methods: We analyzed data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry applying an age- and sex-matched analysis of associations (Cramer's V) for single food triggers and calculated odds ratios (ORs) for severe FIA. Results: We identified 3,427 cases of confirmed FIA showing an age-dependent elicitor ranking (for children: peanut, cow's milk, cashew, and hen's egg; and for adults: wheat flour, shellfish, hazelnut, and soy). The age- and sex-matched analysis revealed defined symptom patterns for wheat and cashew. Wheat-induced anaphylaxis was more frequently associated with cardiovascular symptoms (75.7%; Cramer's V = 0.28) and cashew-induced anaphylaxis with gastrointestinal symptoms (73.9%; Cramer's V = 0.20). Furthermore, concomitant atopic dermatitis was slightly associated with anaphylaxis to hen's egg (Cramer's V = 0.19) and exercise was strongly associated with anaphylaxis to wheat (Cramer's V = 0.56). Additional factors influencing the severity were alcohol intake in wheat anaphylaxis (OR = 3.23; CI, 1.31-8.83) and exercise in peanut anaphylaxis (OR = 1.78; CI, 1.09-2.95). Conclusions: Our data show that FIA is age-dependent. In adults, the range of elicitors inducing FIA is broader. For some elicitors, the severity of FIA seems to be related to the elicitor. These data require confirmation in future studies considering a clear differentiation between augmentation and risk factors in FIA.
-
A New Diagnostic Criteria of Wheat-Dependent, Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis in China
Nan-Nan Jiang,Li-Ping Wen,Hong Li,Jia Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.239304
IF: 6.133
2018-09-05
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) is an allergic reaction induced by intense exercise combined with wheat ingestion. The gold standard for diagnosis of WDEIA is a food exercise challenge; however, this test is unacceptable for Chinese WDEIA patients and unable to be approved by the Ethics Committee of Chinese hospitals due to substantial risk. There are no diagnostic criteria for Chinese WDEIA patients. The aim of present study was to propose new practical diagnosis criteria for Chinese WDEIA patients.METHODS: We prospectively included 283 clinically diagnosed WDEIA patients from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2014, and in the meanwhile, three groups were enrolled which included 133 patients with the history of anaphylaxis induced by food other than wheat, 186 recurrent urticaria patients, and 94 healthy participants. Clinical comprehensive evaluation by allergists used as the reference gold standard, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, areas under curve (AUC) for specific immunoglobin E (sIgE) were compared to evaluate the diagnostic value of IgE specific to wheat, gluten, and ω-5 gliadin. Patients were followed up by telephone questionnaire 1 year after diagnosis.RESULTS: We reviewed 567 anaphylactic reactions in 283 WDEIA patients. Of these anaphylactic reactions, 415 (73.3%) reactions were potentially life-threatening anaphylaxis. Among the 567 anaphylactic reactions, 75% (425/567) occurred during exercise. The highest AUC (0.910) was observed for sIgE for gluten, followed by omega-5 gliadin (AUC 0.879). Combined gluten- and ω-5 gliadin-specific IgE testing provided sensitivity and specificity of 73.1% and 99.0%, respectively. During the 1-year follow-up period, repeat anaphylaxis was rare when patients observed strict avoidance of wheat products combined with exercise or other triggering agents.CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we proposed diagnostic criteria and management of WDEIA patients in China. Our present study suggested that confirmed anaphylactic reactions triggered by wheat with positive sIgE to gluten and omega-5-gliadin may provide supportive evidence for clinicians to make WDEIA diagnosis without performing a food exercise challenge.
medicine, general & internal
-
IgE Mediated Wheat Allergy Associated with Resistant and Severe Forms of Allergic Conjunctivitis
Khulood M Sayed,Abdellah H Ali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/18743064-v16-e2208170
2022-08-22
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and criteria of wheat allergy (WA) among patients with resistant allergic conjunctivitis (AC). Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 100 patients with resistant AC. Skin prick-tests (SPTs), total and sIgE against a panel of inhalant and food allergens were performed in all patients' sera. They were divided into 2 groups according to skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) level, namely the wheat sensitive group (WSG) and wheat tolerant group (WTG). Total ocular symptom scores (TOSS) and 4-point sign scales were correlated for both groups. Results: Ten patients out of 100 with IgE-mediated resistant AC were wheat sensitive, and the other 90 were wheat tolerant patients. WSG included patients of significantly younger age. Positive family history of atopy was proven in 100% of WSG vs. 67% of WTG. A significantly higher frequency of multiorgan allergy was detected in 100% of WSG vs. 20% in WTG (P = 0.0001). Thirty (30%) of WSG had associated allergic rhinitis (AR) and bronchial asthma (BA). Another 30% had an associated AR only, 10% had an associated BA only, and another 20% had an associated skin allergy. TOSS, 4- point sign scale, and total IgE level were significantly higher in WSG. Conclusion: This study provides novel evidence that wheat allergy is responsible for some severe forms of AC.
-
Evaluation Of The Role Of Ige Responses To Der P 1 And Der P 2 In Chinese House Dust Mite-Allergic Patients
h y wang,z s gao,xuzhan zhou,y dai,wei yao,x f zhang,z w yang,s d wu,c h yu,x y yang,r van ree
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000438724
2015-01-01
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Abstract:Background: The role of specific IgE (sIgE) against Der p 1 and Der p 2 in Chinese patients with house dust mite (HDM) allergy has not yet been well investigated. Methods: One hundred patients were enrolled, based on sensitization and doctor-diagnosed allergy to HDM. Questionnaires were administered to document demographic and clinical characteristics. Serum IgE reactivity to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) extract, Der p 1, Der p 2 and Der p 10 was measured by ImmunoCAP. Results: Almost all patients were sensitized to Der p 1 (95%) and Der p 2 (93%), with both allergens together being largely responsible for the total anti-HDM IgE response. No evidence for a significant role of Der p 10 was found. Overall, IgE responses to HDM and its 2 major allergens were higher in children than in adults in this cross-sectional study. With increasing age, IgE responses to Der p 2 become more important. A positive correlation was observed between the reaction of sIgE against Dp, Der p 1 and Der p 2 and the number of organs (including the eyes, nose, lungs and skin) that were affected in patients. Conclusions: In China, Der p 1 and Der p 2 are the dominant allergens in patients with HDM allergy. The relative importance of Der p 1 and Der p 2 changes with age, in favor of Der p 2. Overall, sIgE titers were positively associated with the number of organs affected. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
-
Clinical Manifestations and Causes of Anaphylaxis. Analysis of 382 Cases from the Anaphylaxis Registry in West Pomerania Province in Poland
Iwona Poziomkowska-Gęsicka,Michał Kurek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082787
IF: 4.614
2020-04-17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Anaphylaxis is most commonly defined as an acute, severe, potentially life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Current expert consensus has defined anaphylaxis as a serious reaction that is rapid in onset and can be fatal, and is a severe, potentially life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction that is still rarely diagnosed. For safety reasons, patients should visit an allergologist to identify potential causes of this reaction. There are no data from other health care centres in Poland presenting characteristics of anaphylactic reactions. Clinical manifestations of anaphylaxis should be analysed, because some patients (10–30%) with anaphylaxis can present without cutaneous findings. This lack of skin/mucosa involvement can lead to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Objectives—to gather epidemiological data on anaphylactic reactions, to identify clinical manifestations of anaphylaxis (organ systems involved), to present diagnostic methods useful for the identification of anaphylaxis triggers, and most importantly, to find causes of anaphylaxis. In this retrospective analysis, we used a questionnaire-based survey regarding patients visiting the Clinical Allergology Department, Pomeranian Medical University (PMU) in Szczecin, between 2006 and 2015. The registry comprised patients with grade II (Ring and Messmer classification) or higher anaphylaxis. Patients with grade I anaphylaxis (e.g., urticaria) were not included in the registry. The incidence of anaphylaxis was higher in women. Clinical manifestations included cutaneous and cardiovascular symptoms, but more than 20% of patients did not present with cutaneous symptoms, which may create difficulties for fast and correct diagnosis. Causes of anaphylaxis were identified and confirmed by means of detailed medical interview, skin tests (STs), and measurement of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and tryptase levels. In the analysed group, the most common cause of anaphylaxis (allergic and nonallergic) was Hymenoptera stinging (wasp), drugs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs) and foods (peanuts, tree nuts, celery). The incidence of anaphylaxis is low, but because of its nature and potentially life-threatening consequences it requires a detailed approach. Comprehensive management of patients who have had anaphylaxis can be complex, so partnerships between allergy specialists, emergency medicine and primary care providers are necessary. Monitoring its range is very important to monitor changes in allergy development.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
-
Peanut‐induced anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry
Ioana Maris,Sabine Dölle‐Bierke,Jean‐Marie Renaudin,Lars Lange,Alice Koehli,Thomas Spindler,Jonathan Hourihane,Kathrin Scherer,Katja Nemat,C. Kemen,Irena Neustädter,Christian Vogelberg,Thomas Reese,Ismail Yildiz,Zsolt Szepfalusi,Hagen Ott,Helen Straube,Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos,Susanne Hämmerling,Ute Staden,Michael Polz,Tihomir Mustakov,Ewa Cichocka‐Jarosz,Renata Cocco,Alessandro Giovanni Fiocchi,Montserrat Fernandez‐Rivas,Margitta Worm,Network for Online Registration of Anaphylaxis,J Grünhagen,M Wittenberg,K Beyer,A Henschel,S Küper,A Möser,T Fuchs,F Ruëff,B Wedi,G Hansen,T Buck,J Büsselberg,R Drägerdt,L Pfeffer,H Dickel,C Körner‐Rettberg,H Merk,S Lehmann,A Bauer,A Nordwig,S Zeil,C Hannapp,N Wagner,E Rietschel,N Hunzelmann,I Huseynow,R Treudler,S Aurich,F Prenzel,L Klimek,O Pfaar,N Reider,W Aberer,E Varga,B Bogatu,P Schmid‐Grendelmeier,R Guggenheim,F Riffelmann,B Kreft,K Kinaciyan,L Hartl,C Ebner,F Horak,R Brehler,J Witte,M Buss,S Hompes,T Bieber,S Gernert,M Bücheler,U Rabe,W Brosi,S Nestoris,T Hawranek,R Lang,R Bruns,C Pföhler,P Eng,S Schweitzer‐Krantz,S Meller,H Rebmann,J Fischer,G Stichtenoth,S Thies,M Gerstlauer,P Utz,I Neustädter,J Klinge,S Volkmuth,S Plank‐Habibi,B Schilling,A Kleinheinz,A Brückner,K Schäkel,I Manolaraki,M Kowalski,K Solarewicz‐Madajek,S Tscheiller,J Seidenberg,V Cardona,B Garcia,M Bilo,N Cabañes Higuero,A Vega Castro,I Poziomkowska‐Gęsicka,S Büsing,C Virchow,G Christoff,U Jappe,S Müller,F Knöpfel,A‐K Correard,B Rogala,A Montoro,A Brandes,A Muraro,N Zimmermann,D Hernandez,P Minale,J Niederwimmer,B Zahel,L Dahdah,S Arasi,A Reissig,F Eitelberger,R Asero,F Hermann,S Zeidler,S Pistauer,M Geißler,L Ensina,A Plaza Martin,J Meister,S Stieglitz,E Hamelmann,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14683
IF: 12.4
2021-01-03
Allergy
Abstract:BackgroundPeanut allergy has a rising prevalence in high‐income countries, affecting 0.5–1.4% of children. This study aimed to better understand peanut anaphylaxis in comparison to anaphylaxis to other food triggers in European children and adolescents. MethodsData was sourced from the European Anaphylaxis Registry via an online questionnaire, after in‐depth review of food induced anaphylaxis cases in a tertiary paediatric allergy centre. Results3514 cases of food anaphylaxis were reported between July 2007 ‐ March 2018, 56% in patients younger than 18 years. Peanut anaphylaxis was recorded in 459 children and adolescents (85% of all peanut anaphylaxis cases). Previous reactions (42% vs 38%; p=0.001), asthma comorbidity (47% vs 35%; p<0.001), relevant co‐factors (29% vs 22%; p=0.004) and biphasic reactions (10% vs 4%; p=0.001) were more commonly reported in peanut anaphylaxis. Most cases were labelled as severe anaphylaxis (Ring&Messmer grade III 65% vs 56% and grade IV 1.1% vs 0.9%; p=0.001). Self‐administration of intramuscular adrenaline was low (17% vs 15%), professional adrenaline administration was higher in non‐peanut food anaphylaxis (34% vs 26%; p=0.003). Hospitalisation was higher for peanut anaphylaxis (67% vs 54%; p=0.004). ConclusionsThe European Anaphylaxis Registry data confirmed peanut as one of the major causes of severe, potentially life‐threatening allergic reactions in European children, with some characteristic features e.g. presence of asthma comorbidity and increased rate of biphasic reactions. Usage of intramuscular adrenaline as first line treatment is low and needs to be improved. The Registry, designed as the largest database on anaphylaxis, allows continuous assessment of this condition.
immunology,allergy
-
Occupational asthma from reactivity to an alkaline hydrolysis derivative of gluten
P Lachance,A Cartier,J Dolovich,J L Malo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(88)90906-2
Abstract:A 29-year-old female subject had been working for 13 years in a company producing biscuits. She was exposed intermittently to an alkaline hydrolysis wheat gluten derivative (AHGD) that was incorporated into marshmallows. Five years before being referred, she started reporting rhinoconjunctivitis and asthmatic symptoms immediately after handling AHGD. When she was first assessed, she had avoided contact with AHGD for 1 year, and she was asymptomatic. Normal spirometry and bronchial responsiveness to histamine (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1, 22 mg/ml) were obtained. There was a positive allergy skin test to ragweed pollen and to AHGD at 0.01 mg/ml. Skin tests with individual extracts of cereals, including wheat, were negative. Inhalation challenge with AHGD for 15 seconds caused immediate rhinoconjunctivitis and bronchoconstriction (maximum fall of 40% in FEV1 30 minutes after the exposure) with complete recovery 2 hours later. There was no reaction thereafter, and the provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 was not significantly changed (13.1 mg/ml) 9 hours after the challenge. Inhalation challenge with wheat flour containing native gluten for 30 minutes did not cause any symptoms or significant change in FEV1. IgE RAST counts were greater with the AHGD than with gluten and the whole wheat extract; the opposite was generally found with sera from individuals with baker's asthma and wheat food allergy. With the serum of the affected worker, AHGD completely inhibited the corresponding RAST, but gluten did not. With wheat food allergy, AHGD was relatively inactive inhibition of the wheat and gluten RAST, but gluten was effective.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
International survey of knowledge of food-induced anaphylaxis
Julie Wang,Michael C Young,Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12284
Abstract:Background: Studies show that anaphylaxis is under-recognized and epinephrine (adrenaline) is under-used by medical personnel as well as patients and their families. This study assesses the knowledge of food-induced anaphylaxis diagnosis and management across different populations of providers and caregivers and other interested respondents. Methods: An online survey embedded in a case discussion of food-induced anaphylaxis was distributed by Medscape to registered members. Results: A total of 7822 responders who started the activity chose to answer at least some of the questions presented (response rate 39.5%). Over 80% of responders in all groups correctly identified the case of anaphylaxis with prominent skin and respiratory symptoms; however, only 55% correctly recognized the case without skin symptoms as anaphylaxis. Only 23% of responders correctly selected risk factors for anaphylaxis, with physicians significantly more likely to choose the correct answers as compared to allied health, other health professionals, and medical students (p < 0.001). Ninety-five percent selected epinephrine (adrenaline) as the most appropriate treatment for anaphylaxis, and 81% correctly indicated that there are no absolute contraindications for epinephrine (adrenaline) in the setting of anaphylaxis. When presented a case of a child with no documented history of allergies who has symptoms of anaphylaxis, more physicians than any other group chose to administer stock epinephrine (adrenaline) (73% vs. 60%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Specific knowledge deficits for food-induced anaphylaxis persist across all groups. Further educational efforts should be aimed not only at the medical community but also for the entire caregiver community and general public, to optimize care for food allergic individuals.
-
Sensitization against medical hyaluronidase in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity against hymenoptera species and its clinical implications
Mattis Bertlich,Daniela Hartmann,Saskia Freytag,Lars E French,Eva Oppel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae290
IF: 11.113
2024-07-15
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Background Hyaluronidase is an ubiquitious enzyme, present, amongst others, in hymenoptera venom and in medical formulations. The latter include use as an emergency treatment or to correct undesired outcomes of medical and aesthetic procedures using hyaluronic acid fillers. By performing detailed allergy work-ups including prick-testing we investigated here if patients with a history of allergic reaction to hymenoptera venom are also sensitized to medical grade hyaluronidase. Methods Ninety patients with a history of type-1 reaction to hymenoptera venom with and without a history of previous specific venom immunotherapy were included in the study. All underwent skin prick tests for medical hyaluronidase. All patients also underwent serological analysis for Api m2, the only commercially available IgE-test for a hymenoptera hyaluronidase. Results Of the 90 patients with previous type-1 reactions to hymenoptera venom hyaluronidase included in the study, 60 had undergone previous venom immunotherapy, 30 did not. A majority (73/90) were allergic to wasps, followed by honeybees (14/90) and 3 were allergic to both. Neither patients having undergone previous immunotherapy nor those allergic to bees showed positive skin prick tests to medical hyaluronidase. Of those with a wasp allergy and naïve to immunotherapy, over 20% (5/23) showed positive skin prick tests to medical hyaluronidase. Healthy controls (0/30) without previous allergic reactions to hymenoptera did not show positive skin prick tests to medical hyaluronidase. Conclusion Sensitization to hyaluronidase is most common in wasp-allergic patients who have not had previous specific immunotherapy. As allergic reactions to medical hyaluronidase are reported to be scarce, this group is probably at the highest risk to develop anaphlaxis to medical hyaluronidase. While all patients with untreated anaphylaxis to hymenoptera venom should consult an allergy specialist, particularly those with untreated wasp allergies need to seek a specialist’s advice before treatment with medical hyaluronidase is initiated.
dermatology
-
Anaphylaxis in Chinese Children: Different Clinical Profile Between Children with and without a History of Asthma/Recurrent Wheezing
Nannan Jiang,Wei Xu,Huijie Huang,Xiaoling Hou,Li Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S376495
2022-08-18
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Abstract:Nannan Jiang, 1– 3 Wei Xu, 1– 3 Huijie Huang, 1– 3 Xiaoling Hou, 1– 3 Li Xiang 1– 3 1 Department of Allergy, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2 Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 3 China National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Li Xiang, Department of Allergy, Beijing Children′s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children′s Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Tel/Fax +861059616934, Email Purpose: Asthma and recurrent wheezing (RW) have been identified as risk factors for anaphylaxis; however, little is known about the characteristics of anaphylaxis in children with a history of asthma or RW in Chinese children. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, observational chart review of children who were diagnosed with anaphylaxis in a tertiary children's hospital between 2014 and 2021. Patients' demographics, symptoms, triggers and presence of physician-diagnosed asthma/RW history were collected from medical charts. Results: A total of 399 anaphylactic reactions in 264 patients were analyzed; 119 patients (45.1%) had a history of asthma/RW. Food was the most common cause (85.5%, 341/399). Compared with patients without a history of asthma/RW, buckwheat-induced anaphylaxis was significantly more common in the asthma/RW group (9.4% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001), patients with a history of asthma/RW had higher rates of oropharyngeal symptoms (17.3% vs 8.6%, p = 0.011) and wheezing (34.5% vs 15.9%, p < 0.001). Ninety-one reactions (22.8%, 91/399) presented as severe anaphylaxis, but no difference existed between asthma/RW and non-asthma/RW groups. Children with a history of asthma/RW were more likely to receive inhaled β agonists than children without a history of asthma/RW (11.8% vs 2.5%, p = 0.003). A larger proportion of children without asthma/RW history were treated with epinephrine (11.7%) than children with asthma/RW history (6.9%). Conclusion: Our finding revealed that different clinical profiles of anaphylaxis in children with and without a history of asthma/RW. Our study did not find that children with a history of asthma/RW have more severe anaphylactic reactions compared with children without asthma/RW. Buckwheat-induced anaphylaxis was more common in the asthma/RW group, wheezing and oropharyngeal symptoms affected a higher proportion of the asthma/RW group. Keywords: anaphylaxis, asthma, epinephrine, wheezing, children Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially life threatening acute allergic reaction. 1 Studies have shown that 11–38% of children who experienced anaphylaxis have a history of asthma or recurrent wheezing (RW). 2–5 Asthma is present in 61–78% of patients with fatal anaphylaxis. 6–9 Asthma is indicated as a risk factor for severe anaphylaxis and fatal anaphylaxis in many consensus statements and guidelines, and RW may have potential risk or associations for developing anaphylaxis in infancy. 1,10–14 However, the relationship between asthma and severe anaphylaxis remains controversial. Recent literature has suggested that asthma itself is not a strong predictor of more severe anaphylaxis. Dribin et al did not find that children hospitalized for anaphylaxis with a history of asthma were not more likely to have severe anaphylactic reactions compared with children without asthma. 5 Recent studies of fatal and near-fatal reactions to allergen immunotherapy suggest that suboptimal asthma control, rather than just the presence of asthma, may increase a patient's likelihood of having severe anaphylaxis. 15,16 Few studies have suggested that the presence of asthma or RW increases the risk of wheezing and respiratory arrest among patients with food-induced anaphylaxis. 17 Life-threatening manifestations in food anaphylaxis are generally caused by respiratory compromise; therefore, underlying bronchial hyperactivity in asthma or RW are likely to be significant risk factors. 18,19 Little is known whether asthma or RW comorbidity is related to the clinical profile of anaphylaxis. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of anaphylaxis in children with asthma or RW compared to patients without asthma or RW and see whether a history of asthma or RW portends an increased risk of more severe anaphylactic reaction. This study has been performed in accordance with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the Research and Ethics -Abstract Truncated-
immunology,allergy,respiratory system
-
Predicting reactivity threshold in children with anaphylaxis to peanut
T Reier-Nilsen,M M Michelsen,K C Lødrup Carlsen,K-H Carlsen,P Mowinckel,U C Nygaard,E Namork,M P Borres,G Håland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13078
Abstract:Background: Peanut allergy necessitates dietary restrictions, preferably individualized by determining reactivity threshold through an oral food challenge (OFC). However, risk of systemic reactions often precludes OFC in children with severe peanut allergy. Objective: We aimed to determine whether clinical and/or immunological characteristics were associated with reactivity threshold in children with anaphylaxis to peanut and secondarily, to investigate whether these characteristics were associated with severity of the allergic reaction during OFC. Methods: A double-blinded placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with peanut was performed in 96 5- to 15-year-old children with a history of severe allergic reactions to peanut and/or sensitization to peanut (skin prick test [SPT] ≥3 mm or specific immunoglobulin E [s-IgE] ≥0.35 kUA/L). Investigations preceding the DBPCFC included a structured interview, SPT, lung function measurements, serological immunology assessment (IgE, IgG and IgG4 ), basophil activation test (BAT) and conjunctival allergen provocation test (CAPT). International standards were used to define anaphylaxis and grade the allergic reaction during OFC. Results: During DBPCFC, all 96 children (median age 9.3, range 5.1-15.2) reacted with anaphylaxis (moderate objective symptoms from at least two organ systems). Basophil activation (CD63+ basophils ≥15%), peanut SPT and the ratio of peanut s-IgE/total IgE were significantly associated with reactivity threshold and lowest observed adverse events level (LOAEL) (all P < .04). Basophil activation best predicted very low threshold level (<3 mg of peanut protein), with an optimal cut-off of 75.8% giving a 93.5% negative predictive value. None of the characteristics were significantly associated with the severity of allergic reaction. Conclusion and clinical relevance: In children with anaphylaxis to peanut, basophil activation, peanut SPT and the ratio of peanut s-IgE/total IgE were associated with reactivity threshold and LOAEL, but not with allergy reaction severity.
-
Acid Hydrolysis of Wheat Gluten Induces Formation of New Epitopes but Does Not Enhance Sensitizing Capacity by the Oral Route: A Study in “Gluten Free” Brown Norway Rats
Stine Kroghsbo,Nanna B. Andersen,Tina F. Rasmussen,Susanne Jacobsen,Charlotte B. Madsen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107137
IF: 3.7
2014-09-10
PLoS ONE
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Acid hydrolyzed wheat proteins (HWPs) are used in the food and cosmetic industry as emulsifiers. Cases of severe food allergic reactions caused by HWPs have been reported. Recent data suggest that these reactions are caused by HWPs produced by acid hydrolysis.OBJECTIVES: To examine the sensitizing capacity of gluten proteins per se when altered by acid or enzymatic hydrolysis relative to unmodified gluten in rats naïve to gluten.METHODS: High IgE-responder Brown Norway (BN) rats bred on a gluten-free diet were sensitized without the use of adjuvant to three different gluten products (unmodified, acid hydrolyzed and enzymatic hydrolyzed). Rats were sensitized by intraperitoneal (i.p.) immunization three times with 200 µg gluten protein/rat or by oral dosing for 35 days with 0.2, 2 or 20 mg gluten protein/rat/day. Sera were analyzed for specific IgG and IgE and IgG-binding capacity by ELISA. IgE functionality was measured by rat basophilic leukemia (RBL) assay.RESULTS: Regardless of the route of dosing, all products had sensitizing capacity. When sensitized i.p., all three gluten products induced a strong IgG1 response in all animals. Acid hydrolyzed gluten induced the highest level of specific IgE but with a low functionality. Orally all three gluten products induced specific IgG1 and IgE but with different dose-response relations. Sensitizing rats i.p. or orally with unmodified or enzymatic hydrolyzed gluten induced specific IgG1 responses with similar binding capacity which was different from that of acid hydrolyzed gluten indicating that acid hydrolysis of gluten proteins induces formation of 'new' epitopes.CONCLUSIONS: In rats not tolerant to gluten acid hydrolysis of gluten enhances the sensitizing capacity by the i.p. but not by the oral route. In addition, acid hydrolysis induces formation of new epitopes. This is in contrast to the enzymatic hydrolyzed gluten having an epitope pattern similar to unmodified gluten.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Routinely Used and Emerging Diagnostic and Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Wheat Allergy
Wanqi Zheng,Christine Yee Yan Wai,Jason Ka Chun Sit,Nam Sze Cheng,Christy Wing Man Leung,Ting Fan Leung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12071549
IF: 4.757
2024-07-13
Biomedicines
Abstract:Wheat, a component of the staple diet globally, is a common food allergen in children. The symptoms of wheat allergy (WA) range from skin rash to shortness of breath, significantly impairing quality of life. Following initial clinical suspicion, individuals may undergo routinely used allergy tests such as a wheat allergen-specific skin prick test (SPT), a blood test for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels, or oral food challenge. Conventional management of WA lies in wheat avoidance, yet accidental consumption may be inevitable owing to the ubiquity of wheat in various food products. This article aims to provide an overview of the immunologic pathway of WA, followed by its emerging diagnostic methods, namely alcohol-soluble SPT extracts, component-resolved diagnosis, and the basophil activation test (BAT). The mechanisms underlying wheat allergen-specific oral immunotherapy (OIT) as well as a summary of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of related clinical trials will then be discussed.
biochemistry & molecular biology,medicine, research & experimental,pharmacology & pharmacy