Two Roads to a World Community: Comparing Stoic and Confucian Cosmopolitanism

Yudan Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0014-2
2016-01-01
Chinese Political Science Review
Abstract:From the late twentieth century, cosmopolitanism is reviving in both the Western world and China (in the name of “Tianxia Zhuyi”). In a changing world where modern nation-state system is facing more and more challenges, it is interesting and helpful to compare their respective ancestors: Stoic cosmopolitanism and Confucian cosmopolitanism. The first section of the article examines the constitutions of political spaces in the two cosmopolitan thoughts. Both of them emphasize a “nothing outside” human community, though for Stoics, cosmos is ultimate and fundamental while for Confucians, family is the highest priority. The second section compares the ways to dwell in the world, i.e., why and how such a political space is harmonious. The Stoics and the Confucians have different starting points: one from individual Logos (Reason) and the other from inter-personal “Ren” (Benevolence). However, they reach the same ends: integrating “Self” and “Others” through practices and duties in a world community. The article concludes that the two classical cosmopolitan traditions are commensurable in their core values. They may even shed some light on contemporary IR studies since the ideas they share are those that modern theories have often ignored.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?