An Uncommon Lesion of the Liver.
Peng Su,Jianguo Hong,Tao Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.006
IF: 29.4
2021-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:Question: A 32-year-old man with a positive history of hepatitis B infection for 15 years was admitted to our hospital because of abnormal liver function tests results, including the elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (97 U/L; normal range, 7–40 U/L), aspartate aminotransferase (146 U/L; reference range, 13–35 U/L) and γ-glutamyl transferase (233 U/L, reference range, 7–45 U/L). A blood cell count showed an elevated eosinophil cell count (1.87 × 109/L, reference range, 0.02×109–0.52 × 109/L). Hepatitis B serologies demonstrated positive hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B e antibody, and hepatitis B core antibody. Hepatitis B DNA detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction exhibited a low level of replication (<500 mL/IU). Alpha fetoprotein, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen were all within normal range. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a 4 × 3-cm inhomogeneous enhancement region in the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the inhomogeneous enhancement region consists of 2 masses (Figure A–D, arrows). Physical examination was unremarkable. He had a history of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) with anaphylactoid purpura, eosinophilia, abdominal pain, hepatitis and other symptoms induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 4 years ago, and a history of DRESS relapse 2 years ago. The patient underwent hepatic tumor resection. Pathologic examination was performed. Macroscopic examination showed the tumor consisted of 2 masses and the diameters were 2.0 and 1.5 cm, respectively. The patient is alive without recurrence during 3 years follow-up. What is the diagnosis? Look on page 2260 for the answer and see the Gastroenterology website (www.gastrojournal.org) for more information on submitting your favorite image to Clinical Challenges and images in GI. Microscopic examination showed the presence of abundant lymphocytes, abundant eosinophils, many coagulative necroses, and obvious vascular proliferation with endothelial swelling (Figure E–G). No germinal center was detected. Immunohistochemistry showed the lymphocytes were positive for CD2 (Figure H), CD3, CD5, and CD43. Only a few lymphocytes were positive for CD20 (Figure I). The lymphocytes were negative for CD21. Large immunoblast-like cells were present and were positive for CD30. Ki-67 proliferation index was >30% (Figure J). Genetic testing demonstrated that IgH, IgK, IgL, TCRG, TCRB, and TCRD gene rearrangements were negative. Based on pathologic results, genetic testing results, peripheral blood eosinophilia and 2 histories of DRESS, a diagnosis of hepatic lymphocyte- and eosinophil-rich mass associated with DRESS was confirmed. The patient was misdiagnosed with hepatic T-cell lymphoma initially and hepatic pseudolymphoma subsequently. Although abundant T lymphocytes with high proliferative activity were detected and the large immunoblast-like cells resembled malignant cells, no gene rearrangement was detected. Pseudolymphoma, also called reactive lymphoid hyperplasia or nodular lymphoid lesion, is an extremely rare disease entity and can be found in the alimentary tract, orbit, lung, skin, and thyroid, but rarely in the liver.1Kim S.R. Hayashi Y. Kang K.B. et al.A case of pseudolymphoma of the liver with chronic hepatitis C.J Hepatol. 1997; 26: 209-214Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar This case exhibited significant different characteristics compared with hepatic pseudolymphoma, including (1) the absence of germinal center, (2) the presence of abundant eosinophils and many coagulative necrosis, and (3) abundant T lymphocytes, but few B lymphocytes. DRESS, also called drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, is a serious immunologic reaction to drug metabolites involving multiple organ systems, leading to exanthema, fever, eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, and hepatitis.2Lin I.C. Yang H.C. Strong C. et al.Liver injury in patients with DRESS: a clinical study of 72 cases.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: 984-991Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are a common cause of DRESS. Hepatitis, manifested by abnormal liver function, is the most common presentation of DRESS in liver.2Lin I.C. Yang H.C. Strong C. et al.Liver injury in patients with DRESS: a clinical study of 72 cases.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: 984-991Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar The lymphocyte- and eosinophil-rich lesion associated with DRESS was only reported in skin previously, which mimicked intravascular lymphoma.3Weingertner N. Mitcov M. Chenard M.P. Cribier B. Intralymphatic CD30+ T-cell proliferation during DRESS: a mimic of intravascular lymphoma.J Cutan Pathol. 2016; 43: 1036-1040Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar This case of lymphocyte- and eosinophil-rich mass associated with DRESS is the first arising in liver, which is prone to be misdiagnosed as hepatic lymphoma or pseudolymphoma.