Reflections on the Naturalism of Strong Programme

liu chongjun,zhou cheng
2017-01-01
Abstract:In order to abandon the normative analysis and the teleological explanation pattern in the light of absolutism,David Bloor advocated to make a empirical study of science from the point of view of naturalism. However,the naturalism was not completely implemented in the empirical study of science because of the "scholastic fallacy"of social reductionism and social determinism. As a result,the methodological relativism adopted by Strong Programme was reduced to epistemological relativism in the practice of social study of science. At the same time,methodological scientism adopted by Strong Programme could not provide the living dynamic prospect about scientific practice in consideration of misusing the empirical case studies and causal analysis model. In brief,owing to naturalism which was not implemented completely,Strong Programme is with the trend of anti-science,despite the original intention of reflections on science.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?