Abstract:Notwithstanding the widespread use and large number of advantages over traditional subtractive manufacturing techniques, the application of additive manufacturing technologies is currently limited by the undesirable fabricating efficiency, which has attracted attentions from a wide range of areas, such as fabrication method, material improvement, and algorithm optimization. As a critical step in the process planning of additive manufacturing, path planning plays a significant role in affecting the build time by means of determining the paths for the printing head's movement. So a novel path filling pattern for the deposition of extrusion–based additive manufacturing is developed in this paper, mainly to avoid the retraction during the deposition process, and hence the time moving along these retracting paths can be saved and the discontinuous deposition can be avoided as well. On the basis of analysis and discussion of the reason behind the occurrence of retraction in the deposition process, a path planning strategy called “go and back” is presented to avoid the retraction issue. The “go and back” strategy can be adopted to generate a continuous extruder path for simple areas with the start point being connected to the end point. So a sliced layer can be decomposed into several simple areas and the sub-paths for each area are generated based on the proposed strategy. All of these obtainable sub-paths can be connected into a continuous path with proper selection of the start point. By doing this, separated sub-paths are joined with each other to decrease the number of the startup and shutdown process for the extruder, which is beneficial for the enhancement of the deposition quality and the efficiency. Additionally, some methodologies are proposed to further optimize the generated non-retraction paths. At last, several cases are used to test and verify the developed methodology and the comparisons with conventional path filling patterns are conducted. The results show that the proposed approach can effectively reduce the retraction motions and is especially beneficial for the high efficient additive manufacturing without compromise on the part resistance.

Nonplanar Slicing and Path Generation Methods for Robotic Additive Manufacturing

A Novel Path Planning Methodology for Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing of Thin-Walled Parts

A Non-Retraction Path Planning Approach for Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing

An Optimization Approach for Path Planning of High-Quality and Uniform Additive Manufacturing

Build Orientation Optimization for Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing Coupling with Adaptive Slicing

Design and Validation of 3D Self-Supporting Structures and Printing Paths for Multi-Axis Additive Manufacturing

Modeling and Process Planning for Curved Layer Fused Deposition

Stress-Based Path Planning on Quad Mesh for Additive Manufacturing

Topology Optimisation of Self-Supporting Structures Based on the Multi-Directional Additive Manufacturing Technique

Path Planning of Complicated Hierarchical Thin-Wall Structures Using Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing Technology

A Trivariate T-spline Based Direct-Slicing Framework for Support-Free Additive Manufacturing

Spherical slicing method and its application on robotic additive manufacturing

Spherical Path Planning for Multi Axis Support Free Additive Manufacturing of Truss Structures

Slicing Heterogeneous Solid Using Octree-Based Subdivision and Trivariate T-splines for Additive Manufacturing

Support generation for additive manufacturing based on sliced data

Optimization of Tool-Path Generation for Material Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing Technology

Research on Curved Layer Slicing and Spatial Path Generation Method in Five-axis Material Extrusion Process

Direct Slicing of T-spline Surfaces for Additive Manufacturing

Automatic multi-direction slicing algorithms for wire based additive manufacturing

Layout and Geometry Optimization Design for 3D Printing of Self-Supporting Structures

Layered Infill Area Generation from Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces for Additive Manufacturing