Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire in viral hepatitis patients

qi minghua,peng yanzhong,li jialing,hao yuantao,zhou yuanping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v24.i2.272
2016-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire(LDQOL1.0) in viral hepatitis patients. METHODS: The questionnaire was administered to 100 patients with viral hepatitis and 91 returned the questionnaire. Cronbach α, ceiling effect and fl ooring effect were calculated to test the reliability of this questionnaire. Relationship coefficients between liver disease specific dimensions and SF-36 were calculated to test the standard validity of the questionnaire. Exploring factor analysis was used to test the questionnaire’s construct validity. Responsiveness was tested by comparing scores of patients with different Child Pugh scores. Pearson coefficient was used to show the relationship and ANOVA analysis was used to test responsiveness. RESULTS: Cronbach α ranged from 0.33(95%CI: 0.08-0.52) to 0.9(95%CI: 0.90-0.99), and 80% of domains had a Cronbach α valuehigher than 0.7. Ceiling effects ranged from 0% to 39.6%, and fl ooring effects ranged from 0% to 34.1%, with most domains having the values less than 20%. Six of twelve domains were related closely with SF-36(Pearson coeffi cient > 0.5, P < 0.05). Exploring factor analysis showed that 7 of 12 domains concurred with original imagination. Responsiveness showed that 6 of 12 domains were good(F: 0.353-21.29, P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: Most domains of LDQOL1.0 had good reliability, validity and responsiveness when it was used to test quality of life in Chinese patients with viral hepatitis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?