Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Polycinnamic Foam Hardener and Absolute Ethanol in Treatment of Maxillofacial Venous Malformation

zhang li,wang yanan,liu hua,shao shuai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2017.12.017
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of polycinnamic foam hardener and absolut ethanol in the treatment of maxillofacial venous malformations. Methods From May 2014 to August 2016, 63 patients with maxillofacial venous malformations were treated in the second people’s Hospital of Yunnan province. They were divided into group A(n =30) and group B(n =33). Group A was treated with polycinnamic foam hardener and Group B(n=33) was treated with absolute ethanol injection group. The clinical efficacy,the average times of injections, average treatment time and complications of patients in two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The total effective rate of A and B two group was 100% , the cure rate of A group was 83.3% ,the cure rate of B group was 90.9% ,B group was slightly higher than that of group A,the difference between the two groups was not statistically different(P > 0.05). The average time of injections in group A was(4.5 ±1.3)times, and that in group B was(2 ±0.7) times. The average time of injections in group A was significantly higher than that in group B(P < 0.05). The average treatment time in group A was(3.6 ±1.1) months, and the B group was(1.2 ±0.4) months. The average duration of treatment in group A was significantly longer than that in group B(P < 0.05). In the postoperative complications, the incidence of swelling in two groups of A and B were 86.7% and 90.9% respectively, and there was no significant difference(P > 0.05). In pain, nerve damage, local ulceration, necrosis and fever,etc. B group was significantly higher than the A group(P < 0.05),and there were no serious complications of liver, kidney and lung damage in the two groups. Conclusion Polycinnamic foam hardener and ethanol are hardening treatment of maxillofacial venous malformation in which the drug of choice,ethanol effect is strong,fast,but more adverse reactions, lauromacrogol effect is mild, injection time and treatment time need more ethanol, little postoperative complications, more suitable for the anatomical region or an important use of nerve distribution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?