Outcomes of Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Vs Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

R Zhang,Z-J Zhu,L-Y Sun,L Wei,W Qu,Z-G Zeng,Y Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.04.035
IF: 1.014
2018-01-01
Transplantation Proceedings
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The use of pediatric donor liver for pediatric liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial and few studies have focused on pediatric deceased donors. To address this issue, we decided to perform a retrospective research, trying to compare the clinical effects between deceased donor LTs (DDLTs) and living donor LTs (LDLTs).METHODS:A retrospective review of pediatric LTs using grafts from deceased donors and living donors from June 2013 to August 2016 was performed. The children were divided into a DDLT group and a LDLT group based on their donor styles. The incidence of early vascular complications (VC), biliary complications, and graft and patient survival rates were observed between the 2 groups.RESULTS:There were 217 cases of pediatric LTs performed in our hospital from June 2013 to August 2016 (83 DDLTs and 134 LDLTs). The 1-year cumulative survival rates of grafts and recipients were 89.16% and 91.57% in DDLTs, and 95.47% and 95.52% in LDLTs, respectively (P > .05). The incidence of early VC was lower in LDLTs than that in DDLTs (3.7% vs 19.3%, P < .001). The incidence of HAT in children aged less than 1 year was significantly higher in the DDLT group (P < .001) and can be up to 31.82%. The incidence of biliary complications was similar in the 2 groups (8.4% vs 13.5%, P = .285).CONCLUSIONS:Pediatric DDLTs have similar graft and patient survival rates with LDLT. The incidence of early VC was higher in DDLTs, and children aged less than 1 year are at a higher risk of developing HAT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?