Optimizing Temporal Summation of Heat Pain Using a Constant Contact Heat Stimulator
Parker Kell,Claudia Vore,Burkhart Hahn,Michael Payne,Jamie Rhudy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s439862
IF: 2.8319
2024-02-09
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Parker A Kell, 1 Claudia N Vore, 1 Burkhart J Hahn, 1, 2 Michael F Payne, 1, 3 Jamie L Rhudy 1 1 Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA; 2 Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA; 3 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA Correspondence: Jamie L Rhudy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Promotion Sciences, 4502 E. 41st Street, Tulsa, OK, 74104, USA, Tel +1 918-660-3050, Email Purpose: Temporal summation (TS) of pain occurs when pain increases over repeated presentations of identical noxious stimuli. TS paradigms can model central sensitization, a state of hyperexcitability in nociceptive pathways that promotes chronic pain onset and maintenance. Many experimenters use painful heat stimuli to measure TS (TS-heat); yet, TS-heat research faces unresolved challenges, including difficulty evoking summation in up to 30– 50% of participants. Moreover, substantial variability exists between laboratories regarding the methods for evoking and calculating TS-heat. Patients and Methods: To address these limitations, this study sought to identify optimal parameters for evoking TS-heat in healthy participants with a commercially available constant contact heat stimulator, the Medoc TSA-II. Working within constraints of the TSA-II, stimulus trains with varying parameters (eg, stimulus frequency, baseline temp, peak temp, peak duration, testing site) were tested in a sample of 32 healthy, chronic pain-free participants to determine which combination best evoked TS-heat. To determine whether TS scoring method altered results, TS-heat was scored using three common methods. Results: Across all methods, only two trains successfully evoked group-level TS-heat. These trains shared the following parameters: site (palmar hand), baseline and peak temperatures (44°C and 50°C, respectively), and peak duration (0.5 s). Both produced summation that peaked at moderate pain (~50 out of 100 rating). Conclusion: Future TS-heat investigations using constant contact thermodes and fixed protocols may benefit from adopting stimulus parameters that include testing on the palmar hand, using 44°C baseline and 50°C peak temperatures, at ≥ 0.33 Hz stimulus frequency, and peak pulse durations of at least 0.5 seconds. Keywords: temporal summation, heat pain, second pain, wind-up, Medoc TSA-II Temporal summation (TS) of pain is a C fiber-mediated phenomenon in which pain is amplified over repeated presentations of identical noxious stimuli delivered at a frequency of at least 0.33Hz. 1 It is the psychophysical correlate of windup, a state of temporary hyperexcitability in spinal neurons, 2 and is used by investigators as a model for central sensitization, a prolonged state of spinal neuronal hyperexcitability that can cause hyperalgesia and allodynia. 3,4 That is, TS is used as a measure of pain and nociceptive amplification which can be augmented in chronic pain states. 4–6 Physiologically, all healthy individuals should experience TS as a result of windup of dorsal horn neurons, but greater TS reflects enhanced central pain processing and is observed in people with chronic pain. 4,7 TS has been successfully evoked using multiple noxious stimulus modalities, including electric, mechanical pressure, and heat (TS-heat). When assessing TS-heat, stimuli are delivered using either intermittent contact thermodes (ie, a preheated thermode is applied and removed to the test site for each stimulus) or constant contact thermodes (ie, an attached thermode rapidly heats and cools to deliver each stimulus). 8 The constant contact thermode approach is appealing due to the ease of standardizing duration of stimulus presentations and pulse intervals. Despite this, TS-heat paradigms face unresolved challenges, including difficulty evoking TS-heat in a large subset of participants. Indeed, previous studies suggest that 30–50% of participants show no evidence of TS-heat. 9–11 Whereas some TS-heat investigations have employed fixed protocols, 9,12 in which all participants received identical noxious stimuli, other investigators have developed protocols that individually tailor heat stimuli for participants in an attempt to elicit TS-heat for a greater proportion of participants by accounting for individual differences in heat sensitivity. 13–15 Yet, the use of individually calibrated protocols limits comparisons across groups, requires participants to receive more painf -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology