Abstract:BACKGROUND: Pleural abrasion has been widely used to control the recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). However, controversy still exists regarding the advantages and disadvantages of pleural abrasion compared with other interventions in preventing the recurrence of PSP.METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched up to December 15, 2014 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of pleural abrasion with those of other interventions in the treatment of PSP. The study outcomes included the PSP recurrence rate and the occurrence rate of adverse effects.RESULTS: Mechanical pleural abrasion and apical pleurectomy after thoracoscopic stapled bullectomy exhibited similarly persistent postoperative air leak occurrence rates (p = 0.978) and 1-year PSP recurrence rates (p = 0.821), whereas pleural abrasion led to reduced residual chest pain and discomfort (p = 0.001) and a smaller rate of hemothorax (p = 0.036) than did apical pleurectomy. However, the addition of minocycline pleurodesis to pleural abrasion did not reduce the pneumothorax recurrence rate compared with apical pleurectomy (3.8% for both procedures) but was associated with fewer complications. There was no statistical difference in the pneumothorax recurrence rate between mechanical pleural abrasion and chemical pleurodesis with minocycline on either an intention-to-treat basis (4 of 42 versus 0 of 42, p = 0.12; Fisher exact test) or after exclusions (2 of 40 versus 0 of 42, p = 0.24; Fisher exact test). Pleural abrasion plus minocycline pleurodesis also did not reduce the pneumothorax recurrence rate compared with pleural abrasion alone (p = 0.055). Moreover, pleural abrasion plus minocycline pleurodesis was associated with more intense acute chest pain. The postoperative overall recurrence rate in patients who underwent staple line coverage with absorbable cellulose mesh and fibrin glue was similar to that with mechanical abrasion after thoracoscopic bullectomy (13.8% vs. 14.2%, respectively; p = 0.555), but staple line coverage resulted in less postoperative residual pain than mechanical abrasion (0.4% vs.3.2%; p<0.0001). Pleural abrasion after thoracoscopic wedge resection did not decrease the recurrence of pneumothorax compared with wedge resection alone (p = 0.791), but the intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pleural drainage rates were higher when pleural abrasion was performed.CONCLUSIONS: In addition to resulting in the same pneumothorax recurrence rate, thoracoscopic pleural abrasion with or without minocycline pleurodesis is safer than apical pleurectomy in the treatment of PSP. However, minocycline pleurodesis with or without pleural abrasion is not any more effective than pleural abrasion alone. Moreover, additional mechanical abrasion is not safer than additional staple line coverage with absorbable cellulose mesh and fibrin glue after thoracoscopic bullectomy because of increased postoperative pain. Additionally, pleural abrasion after thoracoscopic wedge resection should not be recommended for routine application due to the greater incidence of adverse effects than wedge resection alone. However, further large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the best procedure.

Pleural Abrasion Should Not Routinely Preferred in Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Efficacy of different surgical procedures in treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

The Effect of Pleural Abrasion on the Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax following bullectomy with pleurodesis or pleurectomy: A retrospective analysis

Feasibility of tubeless thoracoscopic bullectomy in primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients

Is there a change in the view of treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax?: The effect of thoracic CT and autologous blood pleurodesis: a retrospective cohort study

Male adolescents with contralateral blebs undergoing surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax may benefit from simultaneous contralateral blebectomies

Open Thoracotomy versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Bullectomy in Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Effects of Different Treatment Regimens on Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Vicryl Mesh Coverage Reduced Recurrence After Bullectomy for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Population-based study on surgical care for primary spontaneous pneumothorax

Lower Recurrence Rate After Surgical Treatment for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax Using a Digital Chest Drainage System

Safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgical techniques for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax

Comparative analysis of different drainage methods after single pore video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneuomothorax

Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Two Operations for Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Middle-Aged or Elderly Patients

Low Energy Electrocoagulation of Subpleural Multiple Blebs in the Operation for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Incidence and risk factors for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Analysis of Risk Factors for Recurrent Pneumothorax in Patients after Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Risk Factors Predisposing to Prolonged Air Leak after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Compare the effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and limited axillary thoracotomy in treating spontaneous pneumothorax