Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs

Zhixin Lei,Qianying Liu,Bing Yang,Saeed Ahmed,Jincheng Xiong,Tingting Song,Pin Chen,Jiyue Cao,Qigai He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00061
IF: 3.471
2017-01-01
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Abstract:The aim of this study was to explore the bioequivalence of long-acting oxytetracycline in two formulations, a reference formulation (Terramycin 20% LA, Pfizer) and a test one (Kangtekang 20% LA, Huishen). Both formulations were administered intramuscularly at 20 mg/kg body weight at each of 24 healthy animals during a two-period crossover parallel experimental design. The oxytetracycline (OTC) concentrations in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the limit of quantification was 0.05 mu g/ml with a recovery ratio of above 90%. Moreover, the descriptive pharmacokinetics parameters (C-max, AUC(0-144h), and AUG(0-infinity)) were calculated and compared under analysis of variance, and 90% confidence interval (CI) were compared, except for T-max analyzed by non-parametric tests based on Wilcoxons's signed rank test. The comparison results of C-max, AUC(0-144h), AUC(0-infinity), and T-max were 5.066 +/- 0.486, 5.071 +/- 0.877 mu g/ml, 118.926 +/- 13.259, 126.179 +/- 17.390 mu g h/ml, 123.087 +/- 13.906, 130.732 +/- 18.562 mu g h/ml, 0.740 +/- 0.278, 0.650 +/- 0.258 h, respectively, and did not reveal any significant differences. In addition, 90% Cls of these ratios for reference and test product were within an interval of 80-125%, and the relative bioavailability of test one was (94.291 +/- 15.287)%. Therefore, it has been concluded that test OTC was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in pigs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?