ENDO 2020 Blue Ribbon Poster Presentation
Wen Lyu,Lei Zhang,Lin Wei,Shria Kumar,Vinay Chandrasekhara,Danielle Fortuna,Michael L. Kochman,Gregory G. Ginsberg,Jun‐Bock Jang,Alaa A. Redwan,Alex Ingold,Ceslo Ardengh,Larissa Latrilha,Raquelli Barbosa,Vítor Ottoboni Brunaldi,Mariangela Brunaldi,Otavio Neto,Eloy Taglieri,Artur Adolfo Parada,Taimur Shafi,Geraldine Keane,David Reffitt,John Devlin,Phillip Harrison,Tassos Grammatikopoulos,Deepak Joshi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13598
2020-01-01
Digestive Endoscopy
Abstract:To study the clinic value of ASCA, AMCA, ACCA, ALCA-IgG, pANCA and FC for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of IBD.METHODS: Serum and faecal samples were obtained from 42 patients with CD, 27 patients with UC, 17 normal controls.ASCA, AMCA-IgG, ACCA-IgA, ALCA-IgG, pANCA, ESR, CRP and FC were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS:Individual detection: Positive rates of ASCA-IgG in CD, UC and normal group were 23.8%, 3.7%, 5.9%, there is significant difference between CD and UC groups(=4.958,P < 0.05).Positive rates of AMCA-IgG in three groups were 61.9%, 0%, 0%, there is significant difference between CD and other two groups.No statistically significant difference of ASCA-IgA, ACCA-IgA, ALCA-IgG between the three groups.Positive rates of pANCA in CD, UC and normal group were 4.8%, 37%, 0%, there is significant difference between UC and CD groups (=11.916,P < 0.05).Positive rates of FC, ESR and CRP in patients with IBD were 58%, 26.1% and 33.3%.Positive rate of FC is clearly higher than the other two groups, the difference is statistically significant.Joint detection: ASCA, AMCA-IgG joint detection (ASCA-IgG, ASCA-IgA, AMCA-IgG one positive for CD and UC group) and ASCA, AMCA-IgG, pANCA joint detection (ASCA-IgG, ASCA-IgA, AMCA-IgG one positive and pANCA negative in CD and UC groups) both were highly sensitivity in CD group (57.1% and 54.8%).ASCA, AMCA-IgG, pANCA joint detection (ASCA-IgG, ASCA-IgA, AMCA-IgG negative and pANCA positive in UC and CD group) had the highest sensitivity and specificity in UC group.In the joint detection of ASCA, AMCA-IgG, ACCA-IgA, ALCA-IgG, the more positive project, the greater the value of diagnosis of CD.CONCLUSIONS: ASCA-IgG, AMCA-IgG can be used as the specific biomarkers of CD. pANCA can be used as the specific biomarkers of UC.The correlation between FC and IBD activity is better than that of the ESR and CRP.