The value of anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in diagnosing inflammatory bowel disease

Ji LI,Hong,Jia-ming QIAN,Ru ZHANG,Yong-zhe LI,Shu-lan ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0254-1432.2008.10.008
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the distribution of anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) in order to investigate their values in diagnosing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods Serum samples were collected from 175 patients with IBD including 62 with Crohn's disease (CD), 97 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 16 with indeterminate type between Sept. 2002 to July 2007. One hundred and sixty-seven patients were served as controls. Immunofluorescence technique and ELISA were used to detect pANCA and ASCA, respectively. Results The positive rate of ASCA in CD patients (45. 2%) was statistically higher than that in UC patients (14. 4%) and controls (29. 3%) (P<0. 05). The positive rate of pANCA was significantly higher in UC patients (56.7 %) compared with CD patients (4.8 %) and controls (4.80%) (P<0.05). The positive rate of ASCA in control patients with malignant disease, autoimmune hepatic diseases, diffuse connective tissue diseases and intestinal tuberculosis was 42.1%, 4/10, 4/19, and 4/14 respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of positive ASCA combined with negative pANCA in diagnosing CD was 41. 9%, 93. 8% and 81. 3%, respectively, while combined negative ASCA with positive pANCA in diagnosing UC was 48.5%, 98. 4% and 97.9%, respectively. Conclusions Neither ASCA nor pANCA can be used as a screening marker for IBD, while combination of pANCA with ASCA may be helpful in differentiating UC from CD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?