Abstract:Research is a very personal matter. On the basis of experiences in different countries with researchers from different cultures over many years, some observations will be described. The conceptual frame of this attempt is to look for anthropological universals and cultural specifics. Much can be learned from spatial representations in the arts. Whereas in the West since Renaissance time the central perspective has become dominant in visual art, in Eastern landscape paintings the "floating view" is typical. The claim that the central perspective corresponds to geometric laws and matches how we see the world is misleading for at least two reasons: It violates mechanisms of size constancy, and the visual world is spatially reduced in pictures to the perifoveal region only. Research on spatial attention has disclosed two different attentional systems being responsible either for near-fovea vision or for the far periphery. This fundamental principle as a global characteristic of visual processing is neglected in Western art. In Eastern art with a floating view geometric laws are violated, and different potential perspectives are integrated within a holistic pattern. The semantics of what shall be expressed becomes important irrespective of physical parameters. The latter may also create the unique phenomenon of becoming subjectively part of the picture confirming personal identity. Cultural specifics like in the arts (what one might expect) can surprisingly also be observed in theoretical considerations about visual processing. Whereas in the tradition of Western science visual percepts are built up with local elements like feature detectors, in an important Chinese theory global topological features are analyzed first. An important task of the brain is to create the identity of a percept on the basis of spatially and temporally distributed neural activities. It is, thus, an important theoretical question how to deal with the challenge to create and maintain the identity of a percept for some time. It is suggested that one should leave behind a monocausal reasoning for such explanations but adopt for analytical strategies the concept of complementarity as a generative principle.

Asymmetric representations of upper and lower visual fields in egocentric and allocentric references.

Large Perceptual Distortions of Locomotor Action Space Occur in Ground-Based Coordinates: Angular Expansion and the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

Exocentric Reference Frames Determine 2D Orientation Bias

Investigating Cultural Diversity for Extrafoveal Information Use in Visual Scenes.

The allocentric nature of ground-surface representation: A study of depth and location perception

The Visual Field Paradox: A Theoretical Account on the Reafference Principle Providing A Common Frame for the Homogeneity and Inhomogeneity of Visual Representation

Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space

A retinotopic reference frame for space throughout human visual cortex

Allocentric Information Represented by Self‐referenced Spatial Coding in the Primate Medial Temporal Lobe

Spatial orienting in the visual field: a unified perceptual space?

Attentional Reference Frames in Perifoveal and Peripheral Visual Field.

Shifts in the Eye-Centered Frame of Reference May Underlie Saccades, Visual Perception, and Eye-Hand Coordination

Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory

Ego- and Geo-Centered References: A Functional Neuroimagery Study

Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation.

Spatial Frequency Representation in V2 and V4 of Macaque Monkey

An allocentric human odometer for perceiving distances on the ground plane

Building egocentric models of local space from retinal input

Representation of navigational affordances and ego-motion in the occipital place area

East of West, West of East: a matter of global and local identity