Ultrasonographic Features and Differential Diagnosis of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas
Xiao-Ying Qi,Lin Ma,Qiang Lu,Lu-Lu Yang,Jia-Wu Li,Wen-Wu Ling,Yan Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v24.i8.1269
2016-01-01
Abstract:AIM:To explore the ultrasonographic features of solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas (SPTP) and their differential diagnosis from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) and pancreatic cancer (PC).METHODS:Clinical data including conventional ultrasonographic characteristics for 52 patients with pathologically confirmed SPTP,63 patients with PNET,and 68 patients with PC and the patterns of contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in 6 cases of SPTP,10 cases of PNET and 21 cases of PC were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTS:There were significant differences between the SPTP group and the PNET group in age,sex,jaundice,tumor size,shape,calcification,liquefaction,separation,blood flow,arterial phase and late phase enhancement mode and non-enhancement area in the lesions (P < 0.05),while presence of abdominal pain,elevated CA-199,number of tumors,location,expansion of the main pancreatic duct and recurrence or metastasis had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).There were significant differences between the SPTP group and the PC group in age,sex,abdominal pain,jaundice,elevated CA-199,tumor size,location,shape,calcification,liquefaction,expansion of the main pancreatic duct,recurrence or metastasis,arterial phase enhancement mode and non-enhancement area in the lesions (P < 0.05),while number of tumors,separation,blood flow and late phase enhancement mode had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION:A solid or cystic-solid pancreatic tumor which shows peripheral ring enhancement in the arterial phase,hypo-enhancement in the late phase and central non-enhancement area could be considered as an SPTP in young female patients without jaundice,elevated CA-199 or main pancreatic duct dilation.It should be differentiated from PNET and PC.