Abstract:Statement of problem. Conventional radiographic methods are widely used to evaluate the clinical accuracy of implant position. However, such methods require a second computerized tomography (CT) scan and manual registration between presurgical and postsurgical CT data. The alignment errors cannot be calculated. Purpose. The purpose of this clinical study was to introduce a completely digital registration method to evaluate the clinical accuracy of implant position. The digital registration method was then compared with the radiographic method in evaluating accuracy. Some of the alignment errors produced in the digital registration procedures were recorded. Material and methods. A total of 32 implants from 19 patients with sufficient bone volume were enrolled in the study, and all implant surgeries were conducted by one experienced practitioner. Before the surgery, a cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scan was made for each patient along with a diagnostic impression to design the ideal implant position using the Simplant software. After the surgery, the postsurgical implant position was determined using an optical scan of the dentition cast and a series of custom registration models (the digital registration method). A simulated cylinder was designed using the Geomagic Studio software to represent the implant, and the deviation of the ideal and postsurgical implant position was calculated. The accuracy evaluated by the 2 methods was also compared. The parameters of the entrance point, apical point, and axis were recorded for each implant. A part of the alignment errors in the digital registration was calculated automatically and recorded. One sample t test and paired t test were conducted by using a statistical software program. Results. The mean deviation between the ideal and postsurgical implant positions evaluated using the digital registration method was 0.84 +/- 0.57 mm for the entrance point, 1.03 +/- 0.78 mm for the apical point, and 4.52 +/- 2.37 degrees for the angulation. No significant difference was found between the accuracy evaluated by the digital registration method and the radiographic method (P>.05). In the digital registration procedure, the alignment error was 0.03 mm for the registration model and 0.29 mm for the dentition. Significant differences were found in the alignment procedure of the impression cylinder (P<.001) and dentition (P<.001). The average positive and negative errors were +0.09 and -0.19 mm for the simulated cylinder of the ideal implant and +0.08 and -0.15 mm for the simulated cylinder of the postsurgical implant. Conclusions. The precision of the digital registration method could be accepted in clinical applications. No significant difference was found between the digital registration method and the radiographic method in evaluating the clinical accuracy of the implant position. The digital registration method was able to control and minimize the alignment errors produced during data processing.

Preliminary Study of Simplant Software in Mandibular Molar Implantation

[Application of Computer Aided Design/computer Aided Manufactured Techniques in Mandible Defect Reconstruction].

Preliminary Study of CBCT and Simplant Software in the Simulated Surgery of Dental Implant

[Application of Computer Aided Design-Computer Aided Manufacture Technique in Mandible Defect Reconstruction with Individual Titanium Prosthesis].

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

[Accuracy of Implantation Between Two Immediate Implantation Methods in Mandibular Molars].

Pilot Study of Cone Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT)and Simplant in Maxillofacial Three-dimensional Measurement

Establishment of a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model of Mandible with Dental Implants for Immediate Loading

The Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Mandibular Canal of the Mandibular Posterior Area Using Cone-beam CT

Application of Simulated Jaw Model in the Oral Implantology Combining with Three-dimensional Laser Scanning Technology

Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery by a CAD/CAM and Laser Scanning Technique.

Modular Preoperative Planning Software for Computer-Aided Oral Implantology and the Application of A Novel Stereolithographic Template: A Pilot Study

Application of the Bone Quality of Pre-Implanted Mandible Through Optical Density Measurement

Establishment of reference mandibular plane for anterior alveolar morphology evaluation using cone beam computed tomography

CBCT for Preoperative Assessment on Bone Mineral Density in Dental Implant Therapy

Accuracy of Implant Height and Width Measurement with Triaxial Rotation Method Based on Cone-beam CT

Three-dimensional alveolar bone assessment of mandibular molars for immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study

Accuracy of Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Computer Numerical Control Milling for Edentulous Jaws: a Pilot Clinical Trial.

Accuracy of the evaluation of implant position using a completely digital registration method compared with a radiographic method.

Feasibility of Implant Placement in Healed Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Computer-assisted preoperative planning system with an automated registration method in prosthesis-driven oral implantology