Abstract:Background: The popularity of social networks has triggered a number of research efforts on network analyses of research collaborations in the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) community. Those studies mainly focus on the general understanding of collaboration networks by measuring common network metrics. More fundamental questions about collaborations still remain unanswered such as recognizing "influential" nodes and identifying potential new collaborations that are most rewarding.Methods: We analyzed biomedical research collaboration networks (RCNs) constructed from a dataset of research grants collected at a CTSA institution (i.e., University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS)) in a comprehensive and systematic manner. First, our analysis covers the full spectrum of a RCN study: from network modeling to network characteristics measurement, from key nodes recognition to potential links (collaborations) suggestion. Second, our analysis employs non-conventional model and techniques including a weighted network model for representing collaboration strength, rank aggregation for detecting important nodes, and Random Walk with Restart (RWR) for suggesting new research collaborations.Results: By applying our models and techniques to RCNs at UAMS prior to and after the CTSA, we have gained valuable insights that not only reveal the temporal evolution of the network dynamics but also assess the effectiveness of the CTSA and its impact on a research institution. We find that collaboration networks at UAMS are not scale-free but small-world. Quantitative measures have been obtained to evident that the RCNs at UAMS are moving towards favoring multidisciplinary research. Moreover, our link prediction model creates the basis of collaboration recommendations with an impressive accuracy (AUC: 0.990, MAP@3: 1.48 and MAP@5: 1.522). Last but not least, an open-source visual analytical tool for RCNs is being developed and released through Gi thub.Conclusions: Through this study, we have developed a set of techniques and tools for analyzing research collaboration networks and conducted a comprehensive case study focusing on a CTSA institution. Our findings demonstrate the promising future of these techniques and tools in understanding the generative mechanisms of research collaborations and helping identify beneficial collaborations to members in the research community. Published by Elsevier Inc.

The Global Research Collaboration of Network Meta-Analysis: A Social Network Analysis.

Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis

Mapping the Global Research Landscape and Knowledge Gaps on Multimorbidity: A Bibliometric Study

Progress and Challenges of Network Meta‐analysis

The Descriptive Analysis of the Network Meta-analysis

Improvement Needed in the Network Geometry and Inconsistency of Cochrane Network Meta-Analyses: a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Network Meta-Analyses Could Be Improved by Searching More Sources and by Involving a Librarian.

Social Network Analysis of Biomedical Research Collaboration Networks in a CTSA Institution

Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review

Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments

Epidemiology Characteristics, Methodological Assessment and Reporting of Statistical Analysis of Network Meta-Analyses in the Field of Cancer

International Scientific Collaboration on Pituitary Research: A Social Network Analysis

Understanding Biomedicai Research Collaborations Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study.

Network meta-analysis: a powerful tool for clinicians, decision-makers, and methodologists

Social network analysis of international scientific collaboration on psychiatry research

Investigating and Analyzing of Retrieval Status in Network Meta-analysis

Investigating and Analyzing of Reporting Situation in Network Meta-analysis

Macro-level Collaboration Network Analysis and Visualization with Essential Science Indicators: A Case of Social Science

Synthesizing cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-regression

Sharing information across patient subgroups to draw conclusions from sparse treatment networks

Network analysis of cross-income-level collaboration on non-communicable disease: the example of multiple myeloma in Sub-Saharan Africa