Abstract:Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is widely adopted in a variety of fields of information fusion. Nevertheless, it is still an open issue about how to avoid the counter-intuitive results to combine the conflicting evidences. In order to overcome this problem, an improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on similarity measure and belief function entropy is proposed. First, the credibility degree of the evidences and their corresponding globe credibility degree are calculated on account of the modified cosine similarity measure of the basic probability assignment. Next, according to the globe credibility degree of the evidences, the primitive evidences are divided into two categories, namely, the reliable evidences and the unreliable evidences. In addition, for strengthening the positive effect of the reliable evidences and alleviating the negative impact of the unreliable evidences, a reward function and a penalty function are designed, respectively, to measure the information volume of the different types of the evidences by taking advantage of the Deng entropy function. Then, the weight value that obtained from the first step is modified by making use of the measured information volume. Finally, the modified weights of the evidences are applied for adjusting the body of the evidences before using the Dempster’s combination rule. A numerical example is provided to illustrate that the proposed method is reasonable and efficient in dealing with the conflicting evidences with better convergence. The results show that the proposed method is not only efficient, but also reliable. It outperforms other related methods which can recognise the target more accurate by 98.92%.

Conflicting Evidence Combination Based on Uncertainty Measure and Distance of Evidence

Conflicting evidence combination based on Belief Mover's Distance

Conflicting evidence combination method based on evidence distance and belief entropy

Conflicting evidence combination by using uncertainty degree

Weighted Evidence Combination Based on Distance of Evidence and Uncertainty Measure

An Improved Method for Combining Conflicting Evidences Based on the Similarity Measure and Belief Function Entropy

Conflicting evidence combination based on evidence distance and weighted balance evidence theory

A Novel Method for Combining Conflicting Evidences Based on Information Entropy

Weighted Evidence Combination Based On Distance Of Evidence And Entropy Function

Modified Evidence Combination Method Based on Pignistic Probability Distance and Uncertainty Degree

A new combination approach based on improved evidence distance.

Combination of Conflicting Evidence by Using the Total Uncertainty Degree of Information

A Novel Combination Method for Conflicting Evidence Based on Inconsistent Measurements.

Conflicting evidence combination of interval-valued belief structures

A New Reliability Coefficient Using Betting Commitment Evidence Distance in Dempster–Shafer Evidence Theory for Uncertain Information Fusion

Combining the Conflicting Belief Functions

Weighted Combination of Conflicting Evidence Based on Evidence Variance

Combination of Evidence with Different Weighting Factors: A Novel Probabilistic-Based Dissimilarity Measure Approach

Two efficient combination rules for conflicting belief functions

A Conflict Evidence Fusion Method Based on Bray–Curtis Dissimilarity and the Belief Entropy

Combining Conflicting Evidence Using the DEMATEL Method