Abstract:Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is widely adopted in a variety of fields of information fusion. Nevertheless, it is still an open issue about how to avoid the counter-intuitive results to combine the conflicting evidences. In order to overcome this problem, an improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on similarity measure and belief function entropy is proposed. First, the credibility degree of the evidences and their corresponding globe credibility degree are calculated on account of the modified cosine similarity measure of the basic probability assignment. Next, according to the globe credibility degree of the evidences, the primitive evidences are divided into two categories, namely, the reliable evidences and the unreliable evidences. In addition, for strengthening the positive effect of the reliable evidences and alleviating the negative impact of the unreliable evidences, a reward function and a penalty function are designed, respectively, to measure the information volume of the different types of the evidences by taking advantage of the Deng entropy function. Then, the weight value that obtained from the first step is modified by making use of the measured information volume. Finally, the modified weights of the evidences are applied for adjusting the body of the evidences before using the Dempster’s combination rule. A numerical example is provided to illustrate that the proposed method is reasonable and efficient in dealing with the conflicting evidences with better convergence. The results show that the proposed method is not only efficient, but also reliable. It outperforms other related methods which can recognise the target more accurate by 98.92%.

Combining the Conflicting Belief Functions

Conflicting evidence combination based on Belief Mover's Distance

Conflicting evidence combination of interval-valued belief structures

Conflicting evidence combination based on evidence distance and weighted balance evidence theory

Conflicting Evidence Combination Based on Uncertainty Measure and Distance of Evidence

Two efficient combination rules for conflicting belief functions

Conflicting evidence combination by using uncertainty degree

Base Belief Function: an Efficient Method of Conflict Management

New Evidence Composition Algorithm Based on Evidence Distance

A New Weighting Factor in Combining Belief Function.

An Improved Method for Combining Conflicting Evidences Based on the Similarity Measure and Belief Function Entropy

An Efficient Combination Method of Conflict Evidences

A Novel Combination Method for Conflicting Evidence Based on Inconsistent Measurements.

Weighted Evidence Combination Based on Distance of Evidence and Uncertainty Measure

A dicscounting approach to evidence conflict management

An Improved Evidence Combination Approach Based On Credibility Of Evidence

Efficient Fusion Approach for Conflicting Evidence

A novel weighted combination method of conflicting evidences

A Flexible Rule for Evidential Combination in Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence

Weighted Evidence Combination Based On Distance Of Evidence And Entropy Function

Combining Belief Functions Based on Three Mechanisms: Average, Multiplication and Intersection