Comparative Efficacy of Ceritinib and Crizotinib As Initial ALK –targeted Therapies in Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: an Adjusted Comparison with External Controls

Daniel Shao-Weng Tan,Antonio Araujo,Jie Zhang,James Signorovitch,Zheng-Yi Zhou,Xiaopeng Cai,Geoffrey Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.05.029
IF: 20.121
2016-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:Introduction: Crizotinib and ceritinib have been developed to treat advanced or metastatic NSCLC by inhibiting anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK). No randomized trial has compared these treatments head to-head. We compared efficacy outcomes between patients receiving ceritinib and an external control group receiving crizotinib, both as initial ALK-targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC.Methods: Individual patient data for the ceritinib-treated patients were drawn from two single-arm trials (ASCEND-1 and ASCEND-3); published summary data for the crizotinibtreated patients were extracted from three trials (PROFILE 1001, PROFILE 1005, and PROFILE 1007). To adjust for cross-trial differences, average baseline characteristics were matched using propensity score weighting. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate were then compared between treatment groups.Results: Before matching, the ceritinib-treated patients (n = 189) were significantly different from the crizotinib-treated patients (n = 557) in the distribution of race and number of prior regimens. After matching, all available baseline characteristics were balanced. Compared with crizotinib, ceritinib was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.75) and longer PFS (median 13.8 versus 8.3 months, hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.44-0.62) in Cox proportional hazards models. The 12-month OS was 82.6% with ceritinib and 66.0% with crizotinib in a Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall response rate between ceritinib and crizotinib.Conclusions: In an adjusted comparison across separate clinical trials, ceritinib was associated with prolonged OS and PFS compared with crizotinib when used as initial ALKtargeted therapy for previously treated ALK-positive NSCLC. (C) 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?