Abstract:Background The cone beam CT (CBCT) guided radiation can reduce the systematic and random setup errors as compared to the skin-mark setup. However, the residual and intrafractional (RAIF) errors are still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the magnitude of RAIF errors and correction action levels needed in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Methods Ten patients were enrolled in the prospective study of CBCT guided APBI. The postoperative tumor bed was irradiated with 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days. Two cone-beam CT data sets were obtained with one before and one after the treatment delivery. The CBCT images were registered online to the planning CT images using the automatic algorithm followed by a fine manual adjustment. An action level of 3 mm, meaning that corrections were performed for translations exceeding 3 mm, was implemented in clinical treatments. Based on the acquired data, different correction action levels were simulated, and random RAIF errors, systematic RAIF errors and related margins before and after the treatments were determined for varying correction action levels. Results A total of 75 pairs of CBCT data sets were analyzed. The systematic and random setup errors based on skin-mark setup prior to treatment delivery were 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm in the lateral (LR), 3.1 mm and 2.3 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), and 2.3 mm and 2.0 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. With the 3 mm correction action level, the systematic and random RAIF errors were 2.5 mm and 2.3 mm in the LR direction, 2.3 mm and 2.3 mm in the SI direction, and 2.3 mm and 2.2 mm in the AP direction after treatments delivery. Accordingly, the margins for correction action levels of 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm and no correction were 7.9 mm, 8.0 mm, 8.0 mm, 7.9 mm and 8.0 mm in the LR direction; 6.4 mm, 7.1 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.2 mm and 10.5 mm in the SI direction; 7.6 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.4 mm, 10.1 mm and 12.7 mm in the AP direction, respectively. Conclusions Residual and intrafractional errors can significantly affect the accuracy of image-guided APBI with nonplanar 3DCRT techniques. If a 10-mm CTV-PTV margin is applied, a correction action level of 5 mm or less is necessary so as to maintain the RAIF errors within 10 mm for more than 95% of fractions. Pre-treatment CBCT guidance is not a guarantee for safe delivery of the treatment despite its known benefits of reducing the initial setup errors. A patient position verification and correction during the treatment may be a method for the safe delivery.

Cone Beam CT-derived Adaptive Radiotherapy for Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Whole ;breast Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Interfractional and Intrafractional Errors in Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

Study of Interfractional and Intrafractional Set-up Errors in Radiotherapy Utilizing KV Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Determination of Action Limit for Cone-beam Computed Tomography Guided Online Correction of Setup Errors in Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Tumors

Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation

Analysis of Local Setup Errors of Sub-Regions in Cone-Beam CT-guided Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy.

Detection of Intrafractional Tumour Position Error in Radiotherapy Utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography

[Interfractional and Intrafractional Setup Errors in Radiotherapy for Tumors Analyzed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography].

Impact of Residual and Intrafractional Errors on Strategy of Correction for Image-Guided Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Using Corrected Cone-Beam CT Image for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Treatment Dose Verification: the Preliminary Experience

Positioning Errors Assessed with Kv Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Prostate Radiotherapy

Analysis of the Setup Errors of Medical Image Registration-Based Cone-Beam Ct for Lung Cancer

A Clinical Evaluation of Setup Errors in IMRT Using Cone Beam CT for Head and Neck Cancer

Cone-beam CT Scanning in Study of Setup Margin for Pelvic Carcinoma Irradiation

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?

Detection of Setup Errors with Body Surface Laser Scanning for Whole Breast Irradiation after Conservative Surgery

SU-GG-J-109: A Study on Image Guided Radiotherapy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for Head and Neck Cancer IMRT Patient Setup

Megavoltage cone-beam CT in the evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck cancers treated with precision radiotherapy

Optical Surface Management System and BladderScan for Patient Setup During Radiotherapy of Postoperative Prostate Cancer

Dosimetric Study on Learning-Based Cone-Beam CT Correction in Adaptive Radiation Therapy.