Abstract:Objective; The present investigation was designed to evaluate the regenerating effects of chip bone grafts harvested from implant drilling and biomaterials with or without combined application of guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the augmentation of peri-implant bone defects. Materials and methods; Four mongrel dogs were used. After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium implants was performed on each side of the mandible. Chip bone was collected during the drilling procedure. Three-wall bone defects, about 2 mm high, 2 mm wide, and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone or mixture of both except one defect was left empty. The operation areas of the left mandibula were covered with titanium membranes. The right mandibles without membrane were used as controls. The dogs were sacrificed at either 9 or 16 weeks after the second operation. After the specimens containing experimental implants were resected, the resorption amount of the bone graft was measured. Then the specimens were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained with methylene blue and alkalescence fuchsin. Histological examination was performed and photographs were taken under photomicroscope. Results; The mean vertical distances of each bone defects were 2.64±0.17 mm in the D1 (control) group, 1.81± 0.21 mm in D2 (autograft) group, 1.72±0.34 mm in D3 (Bio-oss) group, 1.51±0.22 mm in D4 (mixture) group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between the results of D1 and the results of other three groups (p<0.01). No statistical differences were revealed between autograft group and Bio-oss group, as well as Bio-oss group and mixture group. It is confirmed there was significant difference between autograft group and mixture group (p<0.05). Histological observations revealed both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture grafted specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens.Whether the membranes were utilized or not, vertical distances of the defects were larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings at either 9 weeks or 16 weeks. Statistical analysis indicated there were significant differences in the results between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated the utilization of bone chip collected during implant drilling in combination with biomaterial was a feasible methods for repairing the limited bone defect around the implant. Using the mixture of autogenous bone and Bio-oss mineral as grafting material may significantly promote the bone regenerating effects. The functions of titanium membrane need to be further investigated.

Bone Regeneration of Canine Peri- Implant Defects Using Cell Sheets of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membranes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (vol 77, pg 499, 2019)

Bone Regeneration of Canine Peri-implant Defects Using Cell Sheets of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membranes

Peri‐Implant Bone Regeneration Using Rhpdgf‐bb, BMSCs, and Β‐tcp in a Canine Model

Reosseointegration Following Regenerative Therapy of Tissue-Engineered Bone in A Canine Model of Experimental Peri-Implantitis

Adipose-derived Stem Cell Sheets Combined with Β-Tricalcium Phosphate/collagen-I Fiber Scaffold Improve Cell Osteogenesis.

Bone Augmentation of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects Using Multilaminated Small Intestinal Submucosa As a Barrier Membrane: an Experimental Study in Dogs

Effect of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell in Peri-Implant Bone Defect after Immediate Implant: an Experiment Study in Beagle Dogs.

Periodontal regeneration with stem cells-seeded collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold.

Augmentation of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Different Bone Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Experimental Study in the Dog

Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Placed Implant Of Molar Teeth With Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Two Case Reports

Repair of Bone Defects Around Dental Implants with Bone Morphogenetic Protein/fibroblast Growth Factor-Loaded Porous Calcium Phosphate Cement: a Pilot Study in a Canine Model

Research of Repairing Canine Segmental Mandibular Bone Defects by Using Implant Combining with Bone Tissue Engineering

Biotin-avidin Mediates the Binding of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells to a Porous Β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold: Mandibular Regeneration

Cooperative Effects of PRF and BMSCs in Alveolar Bone Regeneration in a Canine Model

Injectable cartilaginous template transformed BMSCs into vascularized bone

Comparison of Tissue-Engineered Bone from Different Stem Cell Sources for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Study in a Canine Model.

Repair of canine mandibular bone defects with bone marrow stromal cells and porous β-tricalcium phosphate

Comparison of the Use of Adipose Tissue–Derived and Bone Marrow–Derived Stem Cells for Rapid Bone Regeneration

Engineering biomimetic periosteum with β-TCP scaffolds to promote bone formation in calvarial defects of rats

Bone regeneration around dental implant with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells sheet and platelet rich plasma

The use of platelet-rich fibrin combined with periodontal ligament and jaw bone mesenchymal stem cell sheets for periodontal tissue engineering