Abstract:Aim: This study aims to assess the direct impact of bifurcation angle (BA) on immediate procedural outcomes and patient prognosis post-Nano-Crush stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all consecutive patients treated with the Nano-Crush technique across two high-volume interventional centers from January 2020 to October 2022. Primary endpoint: comparison of target lesion failure rate in two cohorts based on bifurcation angle (<70° vs. ≥70°), with secondary endpoints including side branch ostium coverage, rate of successful final kissing balloon inflation (FKBI), need for conversion to another technique, and procedure length. Results: Baseline demographics included 71 patients in the BA<70° group and 49 in the BA≥70° group, with well-balanced characteristics. Angiographic characteristics revealed similar trends, including anatomic and morphological lesion characteristics (referencing Syntax score, Medina classification, and presence of calcifications). Both groups predominantly had complex coronary disease, with a baseline mean Syntax score of 24.18 ± 8.19 in the BA<70° group and 23.91 ± 7.29 in the BA≥70° group, respectively. A dedicated debulking device for lesion preparation was used in 25.35 % of patients in the first group and in 28.57 % of patients in the second group. The primary endpoint occurred in 5.63 % of patients in the BA<70° group and in 4.08 % of patients in the BA≥70° group (P = 0.7014) after ≥ 2 years of clinical follow-up. Angiographic success was achieved in 100 % of both groups, with procedural time averaging 74.99 ± 25.55 min in the BA≥70° and 76.94 ± 27.81 min in the BA<70° (P = 0.6922). The rate of successful final kissing balloon inflation was 98.59 % in the BA<70° group and 95.91 % in the BA≥70° group (P = 0.3566). The mean contrast volume was 189.54 ± 73.74 ml in BA<70° and 168.9 ± 62.77 ml in BA≥70° (P = 0.1126). Clinical follow-ups at 30 days and 2 years revealed similar outcomes and complications for each group, as summarized in Table 3. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the bifurcation angle does not significantly impact long-term clinical outcomes or procedural parameters, such as side branch ostium coverage, conversion to a modified DK Crush technique, FKBI success rate, and procedure length. These findings suggest that the Nano-Crush technique can be a viable option for bifurcation lesions, irrespective of the bifurcation angle, achieving optimal side branch ostium coverage while preventing excessive protrusion into the main vessel.

Culotte Versus the Novel Nano-Crush Technique for Unprotected Complex Bifurcation Left Main Stenting: Difference in Procedural Time, Contrast Volume and X-ray Exposure and 3-Years Outcomes

Long-Term Outcomes of Left Main Bifurcation Double Stenting in Patients with STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock

Thin and Crush: the New Mantra in Left Main Stenting?

Complex coronary bifurcation treatment by a novel stenting technique: Bench test, fluid dynamic study and clinical outcomes.

Single versus Double Stenting in NSTEMI Patients with Complex Left Main Bifurcation Disease

Feasibility, Safety and Long Term Outcomes of Complex Left Main Bifurcation Treatment Using the Nano Inverted T Stenting: a Multicentre Registry

Complex Coronary Bifurcation Revascularization by Means of Very Minimal Crushing and Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer DES: Feasibility and 1-Year Outcomes of the "Nano-Crush" Technique.

P38 SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE STENTING IN NSTEMI PATIENTS WITH COMPLEX LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION DISEASE

Comparative Computed Flow Dynamic Analysis of Different Optimization Techniques in Left Main Either Provisional or Culotte Stenting

Gender-related Differences in Clinical Outcomes after Either Single or Double Left Main Bifurcation Stenting

Randomized Comparison of the Crush Versus the Culotte Stenting for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions

Coronary artery double stenting techniques and their results in complex left main bifurcation disease

The impact of the bifurcation angle for the Nano-Crush two-stent coronary bifurcation technique on long-term outcomes in a real-world clinical population

Prognostic Impact of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation after Single or Double Stent Left Main Bifurcation PCI

Left Main Bifurcation Stenting: the Impact of Strut Thickness on Long-Term Outcomes.

Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study.

ASSA14-12-11 Modified Mini-Crush Versus Cullotte Techniques in Bifurcation Lesions of Left Anterior Descending Artery: Clinical and Angiographic Long-Term Outcome after Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents

Long-term Prognosis of Culotte Versus Different Crush Strategies in Management of Unprotected Left Main Bifurcation Coronary Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.

Residence Time in Complex Left Main Bifurcation Disease after Stenting.

Impact of Different Final Optimization Techniques on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Cross-over Stenting

Optimal Site for Proximal Optimization Technique in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.