Abstract:The analysis of morphology is crucial to the study of phylogeny in many ancient and modern organismal groups. Recently a number of arguments have been made in favor of regarding certain kinds of morphometric variables as putatively homologous characters and allowing them to participate, along with other non-morphometric variables, in parsimony-based cladistic analyses. These arguments rest on the assumptions that geometric landmarks incorporate the concept of biological homology and that partial warp and principal warp morphometric variables uniquely incorporate and operationalize the concept of spatial localization, thus providing investigators with the ability to assess patterns and directions of geometrical variation in unmeasured regions of organic forms. Literature review, coupled with empirical investigations of similarities and differences among three different morphometric data analysis methods on two different datasets suggest that there is no support for these assertions. Geometric landmarks, which form the basis for all morphometric measurements and latent shape variables, have no necessary correspondence to biological homology. Partial warp variables, coordinate-point eigenshape variables, and inter-landmark distance-based singular vector shape-change variables all express localized (= regionally-weighted) geometric deformations. However, none of these deformation patterns are localized in the sense of being truly independent from globally-distributed aspects of shape change. All three of the morphometric data analysis methods investigated are capable of inferring patterns of shape change in remote regions of the form so long as a spatially adequate array of landmarks is used as the basis for the shape analysis. Based on these results it is concluded that: (1) all types of morphometric procedures are potentially useful in phylogenetic inference to the extent that they are able to summarize patterns of biotic shape change within the Euclidean space of the original measurements; (2) morphometric interpretations are strengthened by using alternative analytic approaches to probe the geometric system in a hypothetico-deductive manner and achieve a robust and consistent interpretation of underlying differences among operational taxonomic units (OTU s); and (3) while deformation- based morphometric variables can be used to analyze the distribution of organic shapes in a variety of measurement and latent variable spaces, they represent abstract investigative tools that are tied irreducibly to particular samples and data. Such variables can be used to study morphological characters, refine character and character state definitions, and aid in the assignment of character states to OTU s. However, they are not characters themselves and may not be suitable for phylogenetic analyses directly. In addition, a new morphometric data analysis technique coordinate-point eigenshape analysis is described and its use illustrated.

Morphological Datasets Fit a Common Mechanism Much More Poorly than DNA Sequences and Call Into Question the Mkv Model.

On the Mkv Model with Among-Character Rate Variation

Assessing the Adequacy of Morphological Models using Posterior Predictive Simulations

Assessing the Adequacy of Morphological Models used in Palaeobiology

Complex Models of Sequence Evolution Improve Fit, but not Gene Tree Discordance, for Tetrapod Mitogenomes

Evaluation of the Models Handling Heterotachy in Phylogenetic Inference

Assessing the impact of character evolution models on phylogenetic and macroevolutionary inferences from fossil data

Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study

LANDMARKS, LOCALIZATION AND THE USE OF MORPHOMETRICS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

Inconsistency of parsimony under the multispecies coalescent

Measuring Fit of Sequence Data to Phylogenetic Model: Gain of Power Using Marginal Tests

How to make any method "fail": BAMM at the kangaroo court of false equivalency

Reliable Phylogenetic Regressions for Multivariate Comparative Data: Illustration with the MANOVA and Application to the Effect of Diet on Mandible Morphology in Phyllostomid Bats

Methylation-driven Model for Analysis of Dinucleotide Evolution in Genomes.

On the statistical inconsistency of Maximum Parsimony for $k$-tuple-site data

Do morphometric data improve phylogenetic reconstruction? A systematic review and assessment

Limitations of the Evolutionary Parsimony Method of Phylogenetic Analysis.

Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data

Accuracy of phylogenetic reconstructions from continuous characters analyzed under parsimony and its parametric correlates

Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution

A new hierarchy of phylogenetic models consistent with heterogeneous substitution rates