Abstract:Background The increasing amount of health information available on the internet makes it more important than ever to ensure that people can judge the accuracy of this information to prevent them from harm. It may be possible for platforms to set up protective mechanisms depending on the level of digital health literacy and thereby to decrease the possibility of harm by the misuse of health information. Objective This study aimed to create an instrument for digital health literacy assessment (DHLA) based on the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) to categorize participants by level of risk of misinterpreting health information into high-, medium-, and low-risk groups. Methods This study developed a DHLA and constructed an online health information bank with correct and incorrect answers. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to detect the cutoff value of DHLA, using 5 items randomly selected from the online health information bank, to classify users as being at low, medium, or high risk of misjudging health information. This provided information about the relationship between risk group for digital health literacy and accurate judgement of online health information. The study participants were Taiwanese residents aged 20 years and older. Snowball sampling was used, and internet questionnaires were anonymously completed by the participants. The reliability and validity of DHLA were examined. Logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with risk groups from the DHLA. Results This study collected 1588 valid questionnaires. The online health information bank included 310 items of health information, which were classified as easy (147 items), moderate (122 items), or difficult (41 items) based on the difficulty of judging their accuracy. The internal consistency of DHLA was satisfactory (α=.87), and factor analysis of construct validity found three factors, accounting for 76.6% of the variance. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found 106 people at high risk, 1368 at medium risk, and 114 at low risk of misinterpreting health information. Of the original grouped cases, 89.6% were correctly classified after discriminate analysis. Logistic regression analysis showed that participants with a high risk of misjudging health information had a lower education level, lower income, and poorer health. They also rarely or never browsed the internet. These differences were statistically significant. Conclusions The DHLA score could distinguish those at low, medium, and high risk of misjudging health information on the internet. Health information platforms on the internet could consider incorporating DHLA to set up a mechanism to protect users from misusing health information and avoid harming their health.

Low Health Literacy and Health Information Avoidance but Not Satisficing Help Explain "don't Know" Responses to Questions Assessing Perceived Risk.

Examining Strategies for Addressing High Levels of 'I Don't Know' Responding to Risk Perception Questions for Colorectal Cancer and Diabetes: an Experimental Investigation.

Health literacy of patients using continuous glucose monitoring

Examining the Interrelations Among Objective and Subjective Health Literacy and Numeracy and Their Associations with Health Knowledge

Relationship Between Levels of Digital Health Literacy Based on the Taiwan Digital Health Literacy Assessment and Accurate Assessment of Online Health Information: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Health Literacy and Use and Trust in Health Information

Physical health mindsets and information avoidance

Exploring the Dunning-Kruger Effect in Health Communication: How Perceived Food and Media Literacy and Actual Knowledge Drift Apart When Evaluating Misleading Food Advertising

Why fall for misinformation? Role of information processing strategies, health consciousness, and overconfidence in health literacy

Health Information as "Fodder for Fears": A Qualitative Analysis of Types and Determinants of the Nonuse of Health Information

Causes and consequences of uncertainty about illness risk perceptions

"Don't know" answers concerning somatic disease status should not be regarded as "no" responses

Coping self-efficacy influences health information avoidance

Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review

Lay beliefs about risk: relation to risk behaviors and to probabilistic risk perceptions

Poor health literacy associated with stronger perceived barriers to breast cancer screening and overestimated breast cancer risk

Cancer Information Seekers' Comprehension Level and the Association With Preventable Cancer Risk Factors: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From a Nationally Representative U.S. Adult Survey

Multiple Health Risk Perception and Information Processing Among African Americans and Whites Living in Poverty

Cultural Worldviews and Perceived Risk of Colon Cancer and Diabetes

Correlates of COVID-19 Information Overload and Information Seeking: Evidence from a Community Survey

The role of acculturation in the accuracy of type 2 diabetes risk perception: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016