Abstract:Background Post‐balloon expansion is considered as an appropriate procedure for adequate stent expansion for coronary bifurcation lesions. Two post‐balloon expansion procedures are currently recommended: proximal optimization technique (POT)/side/POT and POT/kiss/POT. However, the effects of the two post‐balloon expansion treatments are different. There is a lack of biomechanical study to quantify the difference. Purpose It is recognized that biomechanical factors influence the occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events (MACE), which includes recurrent angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease death. The current paper evaluated the two post‐expansion strategies and quantified biomechanical parameters to provide a basis for clinical decisions. Methods Based on the CTA data of a patient diagnosed with coronary bifurcation lesions, a personalized coronary bifurcation lesion model was constructed, and the surgical procedure after two expansions was simulated. The POT/side/POT and POT/kiss/POT expansion procedures were analyzed from the perspective of biomechanics through finite element analysis. The biomechanics factors, including the percentage of stent malapposition and stent occlusion at the side branch (SB) opening, the stent ellipse index of proximal main vessel (PMV) segment, the minimum lumen area of the stent vessel segment and the stress distribution of the vessel wall, were used to quantify clinician concerns about factors affecting patient outcomes. The factors include stent adhesion, SB open stent occlusion, poor stent deformation, patency effect of vessel stenosis and vessel wall damage. Results Both post‐expansion procedures were successfully simulated. The malapposition rate during POT/side/POT was larger (1.2% vs 0.42%) and stent occlusion at the SB opening from the cross‐section perpendicular to the SB opening after the POT/side/POT procedure was 0.20%, compared with 0.00% after POT/kiss/POT. POT/kiss/POT produced a larger PMV segment stent ellipse index. Minimum lumen area after POT/side/POT was 5.6 mm2 and after POT/kiss/POT 5.9 mm2. POT/kiss/POT produces an effect of greater vascular stress than POT/side/POT. Conclusion Numerical simulations provide a quantitative analysis to inform clinicians of the differences between preoperative planning and surgical procedures. Biomechanical analysis of the differences between the two post‐expansion strategies found that the POT/kiss/POT procedure resulted in better stent fit, less occlusion of the SB open stent and better vascular patency but also resulted in poor stent deformation and caused greater vessel wall stress. The current study informs rationales for clinical understanding of post‐expansion strategies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Elliptical Stretch As a Cause of Side Branch Ostial Compromise after Main Vessel Stenting in Coronary Bifurcations: New Insights from Numerical Analysis.

The Relation Between Optical Coherence Tomography-Detected Layered Pattern and Acute Side Branch Occlusion after Provisional Stenting of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

Computational replication of the patient-specific stenting procedure for coronary artery bifurcations: From OCT and CT imaging to structural and hemodynamics analyses

Hemodynamics of Stent Implantation Procedures in Coronary Bifurcations: An In Vitro Study

Computational Simulations of Provisional Stenting of a Diseased Coronary Artery Bifurcation Model

A Novel Method to Assess Coronary Artery Bifurcations by Oct: Cut-Plane Analysis for Side-Branch Ostial Assessment from A Main Vessel Pullback

Anatomical and Functional Assessment of Tryton Bifurcation Stent Before and after Final Kissing Balloon Dilatation: Evaluations by Three-Dimensional Coronary Angiography, Optical Coherence Tomography

Dynamic assessment of the left main-left circumflex bending angle: Implications for ostial left circumflex artery in-stent restenosis after successful two-stent PCI

Hemodynamic changes of fractional flow reserve after double kissing crush and provisional stenting technique for true bifurcation lesions.

Local Flow Patterns after Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Coronary Bifurcations - Novel Findings by Computational Fluid Dynamics -

Side Branch Long Lesion with Main Vessel Vulnerable Plaques by Optical Coherence Tomography Predict Target-Vessel Myocardial Infarction after Provisional Stenting in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation

Hemodynamic change in wall shear stress in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated by double kissing crush or single-stent technique.

Contradictory shear stress distribution prevents restenosis after provisional stenting for bifurcation lesions.

Influence of different post‐balloon expansion procedures: a finite element analysis

Is It Safe to Implant Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Ostial Side-Branch Lesions? Impact of ‘Neo-Carina’ Formation on Main-Branch Flow Pattern. Longitudinal Clinical Observations

Impact of stent strut link location in proximal balloon edge dilation technique for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention

Post-procedural and long-term functional outcomes of jailed side branches in stented coronary bifurcation lesions assessed with side branch Murray law–based quantitative flow ratio

Carina Shift As a Mechanism for Side-Branch Compromise Following Main Vessel Intervention: Insights from Three-Dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography.

Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bifurcation stenting

How to use three-dimensional optical coherence tomography effectively in coronary bifurcation stenting

Biomechanical Modeling to Improve Coronary Artery Bifurcation Stenting: Expert Review Document on Techniques and Clinical Implementation.