Abstract:Background While coronary stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can mechanically revascularize culprit epicardial vessels, it might also cause distal embolization. The relationship between geometrical and functional results of stent expansion during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is unclear. Objective We sought to determine the optimal stent expansion strategy in pPCI using novel angiography-based approaches including angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (QFR)/microcirculatory resistance (MR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods Post-hoc analysis was performed in patients with acute STEMI and high thrombus burden from our prior multicenter, prospective cohort study (ChiCTR1800019923). Patients aged 18 years or older with STEMI were eligible. IVUS imaging, QFR, and MR were performed during pPCI, while stent expansion was quantified on IVUS images. The patients were divided into three subgroups depending on the degree of stent expansion as follows: overexpansion (>100%), optimal expansion (80%−100%), and underexpansion (<80%). The patients were followed up for 12 months after PCI. The primary endpoint included sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unexpected hospitalization or unplanned revascularization, and all-cause death. Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled. The average stent expansion degree was 82% (in all patients), 117% (in overexpansion group), 88% (in optimal expansion), and 75% (in under-expansion). QFR, MR, and flow speed increased in all groups after stenting. The overall stent expansion did not affect the final QFR ( p = 0.08) or MR ( p = 0.09), but it reduced the final flow speed (−0.14 cm/s per 1%, p = 0.02). Under- and overexpansion did not affect final QFR ( p = 0.17), MR ( p = 0.16), and flow speed ( p = 0.10). Multivariable Cox analysis showed that stent expansion was not the risk factor for MACE (hazard ratio, HR = 0.97, p = 0.13); however, stent expansion reduced the risk of MACE (HR = 0.95, p = 0.03) after excluding overexpansion patients. Overexpansion was an independent risk factor for no-reflow (HR = 1.27, p = 0.02) and MACE (HR = 1.45, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis shows that mild underexpansion of 70%−80% was not a risk factor for MACE (HR = 1.11, p = 0.08) and no-reflow (HR = 1.4, p = 0.08); however, stent expansion <70% increased the risk of MACE (HR = 1.36, p = 0.04). Conclusions Stent expansion does not affect final QFR and MR, but it reduces flow speed in STEMI. Appropriate stent underexpansion of 70–80% does not seem to be associated with short-term prognosis, so it may be tolerable as noninferior compared with optimal expansion. Meanwhile, overexpansion and underexpansion of <70% should be avoided due to the independent risk of MACEs and no-reflow events.

Influence of different post‐balloon expansion procedures: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Balloon Positions for Proximal Optimization Technique in Left Main Bifurcation Stenting.

Optimal Site for Proximal Optimization Technique in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.

Comparative Computed Flow Dynamic Analysis of Different Optimization Techniques in Left Main Either Provisional or Culotte Stenting

Impact of Different Final Optimization Techniques on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Cross-over Stenting

A Novel Technique of Proximal Optimization with Kissing Balloon Inflation in Bifurcation Lesions.

Mechanical and hydrodynamic effects of stent expansion in tapered coronary vessels

Computational replication of the patient-specific stenting procedure for coronary artery bifurcations: From OCT and CT imaging to structural and hemodynamics analyses

Multimodal Comparisons of Results Achieved by Different Side Branch Ballooning Techniques for Bifurcation Provisional Stenting

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Conditions in Complex Coronary Artery Bifurcations Stenting Using Computational Fluid Dynamics: Impact of Final Proximal Optimization Technique on Different Double-Stent Techniques.

Impact of stent strut link location in proximal balloon edge dilation technique for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention

EFFECTS OF BALLOON LENGTH AND COMPLIANCE ON VASCULAR STENT EXPANSION

Mini- Versus Classical Kissing Balloon Inflation in Provisional Technique for Bifurcation Intervention

Modified Kissing Balloon Inflation Associated with Better Results after Culotte Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions: A Bench Test

A Novel Strategy to Simplify the Procedures in Treating Complicated Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: From a Bench Test to Clinical Application

Microvascular and Prognostic Effect in Lesions With Different Stent Expansion During Primary PCI for STEMI: Insights From Coronary Physiology and Intravascular Ultrasound

Elliptical Stretch As a Cause of Side Branch Ostial Compromise after Main Vessel Stenting in Coronary Bifurcations: New Insights from Numerical Analysis.

Rheolytic Effects of Left Main Mid-Shaft/distal Stenting: a Computational Flow Dynamic Analysis

Proximal optimization technique and percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: POTENTIAL‐LM

Analysis of the Transient Expansion Behavior and Design Optimization of Coronary Stents by Finite Element Method

Post-dilatation Improves Stent Apposition in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Primary Percutaneous Intervention: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Using Optical Coherence Tomography.