Stainless Steel Electrode for Simultaneous Stripping Analysis of Cd(II), Pb(II), Cu(II) and Hg(II).

Shimeles Addisu Kitte,Suping Li,Anaclet Nsabimana,Wenyue Gao,Jianping Lai,Zhongyuan Liu,Guobao Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.08.066
IF: 6.1
2018-01-01
Talanta
Abstract:Traditional electrodes for stripping analysis generally have narrow electrochemical window, require the modification of electrode or the addition of additional ions. To solve these problems, stainless steel has been used as the electrode for electrochemical stripping analysis for the first time. Square wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV) has been used for the detection of Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, and Hg2+. Type 304 stainless steel electrode gives well-defined, sharp, and separated stripping peaks for these metal ions. The electrode, best operated at + 0.3 V (Hg2+), 0.05 V (Cu2+), 0.41 V (Pb2+), and 0.7 V (Cd2+) and after a 300 s deposition at 1.0 V, has linear responses in the concentration ranges of 0.075-5 pM for Pb2+ and Cu2+, 0.5-5 mu M for Cd2+, and 0.1-5 mu M for Hg2+. The limits of detection (at S/N = 3) are 0.033 M for Pb2+, 0.0073 M for Cu2+, 0.231.1M for Cd2+, and 0.028 pM for Hg2+. The reproducibility, expressed as relative standard deviation, is 3.2% for Pb2+, 2.6% for Cu2+, 5.1% for Cd2+, and 2.5% for Hg2+ (each 1 mu M levels; for n = 6). The electrode was successfully applied to the determination of the ions in spiked groundwater samples. This study shows that stainless steel is a better alternative to mercury electrode for stripping analysis because of its well-defined and sharp stripping peaks, high sensitivity, low background, low toxicity, good reproducibility, and much wider electrochemical window.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?