Abstract:Let me paraphrase Lord Kelvin here: The beauty and clearness of the TNM staging system of lung cancer, which has been regarded as the most precise system for prognosis prediction and highly accepted in clinical practice, is at present obscured by a few clouds. We read carefully with interest the article by Kim et al.1Kim H. Goo J.M. Kim Y.T. Park C.M. Validation of the eighth edition clinical T categorization system for clinical stage IA, resected lung adenocarcinomas: prognostic implications of the ground-glass opacity component.J Thorac Oncol. 2020; 15: 580-588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar In this study, they further validated the clinical T category and evaluated the independent prognostic role of the nodule type. Interestingly, the nodule type was not an independent prognostic factor, whereas cT1c and solid portion size were independent prognostic factors in the part-solid nodule subgroup. As the authors have stated, the critical problem is whether the current clinical T categorization system is suitable for part-solid tumors. This raises the following two (more) questions: how to assess the size of part-solid tumors and whether the ground-glass opacity (GGO) component of a tumor contributes to the prognosis. However, these are controversial. Current studies are now strengthening the view that pure GGO or part-solid nodules dominant with GGO may have a specific particularity with pure-solid tumors, and thus they should be classified in a novel clinical T category, regardless of their radiological size.2Fu F. Zhang Y. Wen Z. et al.Distinct prognostic factors in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer with radiologic part-solid or solid lesions.J Thorac Oncol. 2019; 14: 2133-2142Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar,3Mao R. She Y. Zhu E. et al.A proposal for restaging of invasive lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as pure ground glass opacity.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107: 1523-1531Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar Similarly, in the prospective study at our institution, we found that the presence of GGO components was associated with favorable survival, especially for pure GGO nodules (NCT03723629). This observation may have a significant influence on our surgical resection decision. Pathologists have recognized that only the size of a solid component may have aggressiveness. What determines the diagnosis and prognosis should be the invasive component, which is known as the solid component in clinical and pathologic size. Thus, these studies really speak of the development of prognostic models, in which GGO dominance may now be a strong determinant. One thing we have to be crystal clear about is that the TNM stage is based on anatomy, and we cannot mix different parameters, such as clinical factors, nodule or histologic subtype, or information of molecular biology and tumor genetics, particularly biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, etc.), in the system. Nevertheless, we can combine them to build prognostic groups to provide our patients the best assessment and individualized treatment, which is where the TNM staging system really means. In addition, we have the following question: Is the span of 1 cm accurate enough for smaller tumors, such as Tis, T1mi, and T1a? Stage T1 was further subclassified into T1a to T1c on the basis of the size of the cut point for every 1 cm. In many validation studies, no matter how many cases, new T categories had superior abilities to distinguish and identify the different prognostic outcomes of patients, both in the clinical and pathologic stages, which the seventh edition did not possess, especially between stages T3 and T4. Nonetheless, every millimeter may count, and we have to follow up carefully and measure the tumor size accurately. The prognosis may change with the size of the tumor, even if the size increases from 1 cm to 1.1 cm. Finally, the staging of lung cancer with multiple lesions does not seem to have been solved entirely, and the eighth edition staging system has failed to provide accurate prognostic value for lung cancer as a second primary malignancy.4Shi S. Xie H. Yin W. et al.The prognostic significance of the 8th edition AJCC TNM staging system for non-small-cell lung cancer is not applicable to lung cancer as a second primary malignancy.J Surg Oncol. 2020; 121: 1233-1240Crossref PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar The road ahead never stops; large-scale prospective and high-quality studies are needed to bring a superior prognosis refinement and stratification of the current TNM staging system. We need to work together to strengthen dialogue, see the unseen, and change the unchanged. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China (grant no. 81672268) (www.nsfc.gov.cn/). Validation of the Eighth Edition Clinical T Categorization System for Clinical Stage IA, Resected Lung Adenocarcinomas: Prognostic Implications of the Ground-Glass Opacity ComponentJournal of Thoracic OncologyVol. 15Issue 4PreviewThere is controversy regarding the clinical T (cT) category of lung adenocarcinomas that manifest as part-solid nodules (PSNs). We aimed to validate the cT category and to evaluate the independent prognostic role of the nodule type (i.e., part-solid versus solid). Full-Text PDF Open Access

Implications of the Eighth Edition of the TNM Proposal: Invasive Versus Total Tumor Size for the T Descriptor in Pathologic Stage I-IIA Lung Adenocarcinoma.

P1.03-084 Implications of 8th Edition TNM Proposal: Invasive Vs. Total Size for T Descriptor in Pt1a-2Bn0m0 Lung Adenocarcinoma

A Few Clouds over the Eighth Edition T Categorization System

Pathological and Radiological T Descriptors in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma: from Correlations to Prognostic Significance.

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revisions of the T-Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

Reconsidering the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition TNM Staging Manual Classifications for T2b and T3 NSCLC

Reevaluation of Survival and Prognostic Factors in Pathologic Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma by the New 2009 TNM Classification

Analysis of the T descriptors and other prognosis factors in pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer in China.

Investigation of the Non-Size-determined T4N0-2M0 Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: What is the Proper T Category for the Tumour with Additional Nodules in Different Lobes of Ipsilateral Lung?

Prognosis Factors of Pathological Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Resected T3N0M0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Validation of the Eighth Edition of the TNM Staging System for Lung Cancer in 2043 Surgically Treated Patients With Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

Tumor Size As a Predictor for Prognosis of Patients with Surgical IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer after Surgery.

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groups in the Forthcoming (Ninth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

OA07.06 in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinomas, Survival by Tumor Size (T) is Further Stratified by Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces

Risk Stratification Model for Patients with Stage I Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Clinical and Pathological Predictors.

Validation of the 8th Edition Nodal Staging and Proposal of New Nodal Categories for Future Editions of the TNM Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Preoperative Prognostic Prediction for Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas: Impact of the Computed Tomography Features Associated with the New Histological Grading System

Completeness of Resection and Long-term Survival of Patients Undergoing Resection for Pathological T3 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: An International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Analysis

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

Is There a Prognostic Difference among Patients with T3N0-3M0 Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer with Different T3 Descriptors?