Validation of the stage groupings in the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

Xizhao Sui,Wei Jiang,Haiqing Chen,Fan Yang,Jun Wang,Qun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.07.028
IF: 20.121
2017-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:The aim of this study was to validate stage groupings in the 8th edition of the tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) classification in an independent Chinese cohort.We retrospectively analyzed a total of 3,599 patients with pathological stage IA-IIIA (7th TNM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgical treatment in two surgical centers in China between 2005 and 2012. All patients were reclassified according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification. Survival was compared between adjacent stage groupings using a log rank test and a Cox regression model. R(2) was calculated to evaluate the discrimination of the two TNM stage classifications.The median follow-up time was 48.7 months. According to the 8th edition of the TNM classification, the overall survival (OS) of adjacent stage groupings showed significant differences (IA1 vs. IA2: hazard ratio (HR)=0.095, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.013-0.694, P=0.020; IA2 vs. IA3: HR=0.630, 95% CI 0.398-0.999, P=0.049; IB vs. IIA: HR=0.521, 95% CI 0.381-0.713, P<0.001; IIA vs. IIB: HR=0.642, 95% CI 0.475-0.867, P=0.004, IIB vs. IIIA: HR=0.621, 95% CI 0.528-0.731, P<0.001, IIIA vs. IIIB: HR=0.561, 95% CI 0.459-0.686, P<0.001), except for IA3 vs. IB (HR=0.937, 95% CI 0.669-1.313, P=0.706). The 8th edition of the TNM classification yielded a slightly higher R(2) than the 7th edition (0.172 vs. 0.162).This study provided an external validation of the stage groupings in the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer among surgically treated Chinese NSCLC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?