Abstract:Introduction In cardiac computed tomography (CT) examinations, non-contrast scans are often performed in addition to contrast-enhanced scans to quantify the coronary artery calcification (CAC) score. These calcium score scans are associated with additional exposure to ionizing radiation. Purpose We sought to develop a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm capable of determining CAC score based solely on contrast-enhanced CT scans, eliminating the need for additional non-contrast scans. Methods An automated CAC scoring algorithm on contrast-enhanced CT scans was developed and trained using a dataset of 297 cardiac CT studies. Coronary artery calcifications were manually segmented in contrast-enhanced scans using a threshold of 2 standard deviations above the mean attenuation value of the ascending aorta. On non-contrast scans, CAC was manually assessed using a standard threshold of ≥130 Hounsfield Units. A correction factor for calcium score results assessed on contrast-enhanced scans was determined using linear regression. The algorithm was tested on an independent set of 90 contrast-enhanced CT scans (four manufacturers, eight scanner models). We compared automated CAC scores to manual expert reader reference assessments on non-contrast CT scans. CAC scores were categorized into four risk categories following the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography recommendations: 0, 1-100, 101-300, and >300 Agatston Units. Results In the assessment of 90 CT studies (mean age 61.0±11.4 years, 46.7% males), the AI-model detected CAC in 69 contrast-enhanced scans (76.7%), comparable to the human reader's detection rate of CAC in 71 non-contrast scans (78.9%) (p = 0.63). The CAC score was initially calculated using AI-based segmentation of coronary calcification on contrast-enhanced scans and then the result was multiplied by established linear correction factor of 1.97. There was an excellent correlation between AI-model and manual reference total CAC scores (Pearson's r = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.97, p < 0.001). The model correctly classified 77 patients (85.6%) into the same CAC risk category as the human reader (Figure 1). Among 19 patients (21.1%) with a CAC score of zero, only 1 patient (5.3%) was reclassified with a non-zero CAC score by the AI-model. Cohen's kappa value for CAC score risk categorization was 0.80 (p < 0.001), indicating very good agreement (Figure 2). Bland–Altman analysis revealed minimal bias of -9.7 Agatston Unit with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -184.8 to 165.5 Agatston Unit. Conclusions CAC score can be accurately quantified on contrast-enhanced cardiac CT scans using an automated AI-based algorithm. This approach has the potential to eliminate the necessity for an additional non-contrast CT scan, thereby reducing the patient's exposure to ionizing radiation.

Optimized Categorization Algorithm of Coronary Artery Calcification Score on Non-Gated Chest Low-Dose CT Screening Using Iterative Model Reconstruction Technique

Iterative Reconstruction Technique of Non-gated LDCT Chest Scan in Coronary Calcification Score to Evaluate Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Feasibility and Accuracy of Coronary Artery Calcium Score on Virtual Non-Contrast Images Derived from a Dual-Layer Spectral Detector CT: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Performance assessment of an artificial intelligence-based coronary artery calcium scoring algorithm in non-gated chest CT scans of different slice thickness

Reliability analysis of visual ranking of coronary artery calcification on low-dose CT of the thorax for lung cancer screening: comparison with ECG-gated calcium scoring CT

Reliable categorisation of visual scoring of coronary artery calcification on low-dose CT for lung cancer screening: validation with the standard Agatston score

Enhanced CT imaging artificial neural network coronary artery calcification score assisted diagnosis

Performance of artificial intelligence-based coronary artery calcium scoring in non-gated chest CT

Evaluating coronary artery calcification with low-dose chest CT reconstructed by different kernels

Influence of CT reconstruction kernel on the deep learning-based non-gated coronary calcium scoring model in diagnosing cardiovascular risk classification

Prognostic Significance of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging on Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients at Low Risk for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Coronary Artery Calcium Score–Weighted Clinical Likelihood Model Performance in Patients with Stable Chest Pain and Coronary Artery Calcium Scores of Zero

Accuracy of Coronary Calcium Measurements with Low Dose 64-Slice Multi-Detector Row CT

Influence Of Heart Rate And Coronary Artery Calcification On Image Quality And Diagnostic Performance Of Coronary Ct Angiography: Comparison Between 96-Row Detector Dual Source Ct And 256-Row Multidetector Ct

AI-based algorithm for assessing coronary artery calcium score on contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography scans

Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative observation between coronary artery calcium score derived from non-gated chest tomography and calcified lesions assessed by intravascular ultrasound

Application and Significance of Coronary Artery Calcification Score Evaluated with Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography in Cardiovascular Risk Screening

Calcium Scoring at Coronary CT Angiography Using Deep Learning

Quantification accuracy in photon-counting detector CT for coronary artery calcium score: a pilot study

High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition