Comparative observation between coronary artery calcium score derived from non-gated chest tomography and calcified lesions assessed by intravascular ultrasound

Yang Wentao,Yang Xiaoxiao,Zhang Weifeng,Xu Ke,Wang Xiaolei,Zhang Yipeng,Jiang Yue,Shen Linghong,He Ben

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116031.2022.1000129

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To assess the association between the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) derived from ECG-gated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or non-gated chest computed tomography (NCCT) and coronary calcium measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).Subjects:We retrospectively enrolled 96 patients (104 vessels) who underwent coronary angiography and IVUS examination due to coronary artery disease and underwent CT (NCCT or CCTA) scan within 1 month before their procedure, which took place between January 2018 and June 2021 in Shanghai Chest Hospital.Interventions:According to the type and slice thickness of CT, lesions were divided into the following four groups: NCCT/5 mm group, NCCT/1 mm group, NCCT/1.25 mm group, and CCTA/0.625 mm group.Main Outcomes and Measurements:The CACS of target lesions were obtained using the Agatston method. Calcium length, the maximum calcium angle, and calcified plaque surface area were measured by IVUS. A correlation analysis was performed between CACS and the calcified plaque surface area. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the ability and threshold of CACS to identify a calcific plaque with a total calcium arc >180°.Results:Hundred and four lesions were observed in this cohort of 96 patients. The mean age of patients was (66.9±8.7) years, and 67(69.8%) of them were male. Thirty-two patients (33.3%) had diabetes mellitus and eight (8.3%) had renal insufficiency. Fifty-eight (55.8%) of 104 lesions were located in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). The median calcium length was 11.8 mm ( Q1- Q3, 9.6 mm-15.5 mm), the median maximum calcium arc was 154° ( Q1- Q3, 96° - 215°), and the median calcified plaque surface area was 20.0 mm 2 ( Q1- Q3, 13.8 mm 2-26.4 mm 2). A significant correlation was observed between CACS and calcified plaque surface area in each group (NCCT/5 mm [Spearman r=0.637 9; P<0.001], NCCT/1 mm [Spearman r=0.783 1; P<0.001], NCCT/1.25 mm [Spearman r=0.796 8; P<0.001], and CCTA/0.625 mm [Spearman r=0.790 6; P< 0.001]). In the ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut off value to identify a calcific plaque with a total calcium arc >180° was 184.5 in the NCCT/5 mm group (AUC=0.701; P=0.001 3), 202.5 in the NCCT/1 mm group (AUC=0.794 3; P=0.000 8), 194.0 in the NCCT/1.25 mm group (AUC= 0.750 9; P=0.013 1), and 233.0 in the CCTA/0.625 mm group (AUC=0.752 7; P=0.025 6). There was no significant difference in the AUC between each group. Conclusions:Regardless of slice thickness, the CACS derived from NCCT or CCTA had a good correlation with the calcified plaque surface area and proved to be a useful tool to identify calcific plaques with a total calcium arc >180°.