Clinical evaluation of the impact of mediastinal tumour size on the subxiphoid approach video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Muhu Tang,Jiacong Liu,Yongfeng Shuai,Luming Wang,Xuhua Huang,Wang Lv,Xu Lin,Linhai Zhu,Jian Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae015
2024-02-29
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:The application of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for relatively large mediastinal tumours (≥5.0 cm) has been a subject of debate, and few studies have investigated the subxiphoid approach VATS in different tumour size categories. The study aims to compare the efficacy of the subxiphoid approach VATS for achieving curative outcomes based on tumour size categories (<3.0, 3.0–4.9 and 5.0–10.0 cm). A total of 165 patients with anterior mediastinal tumours who underwent surgery at our hospital between January 2018 and July 2022 were consecutively enrolled, categorized according to tumour size—group A (<3.0 cm): 58, group B (3.0–4.9 cm): 70 and group C (5.0–10.0 cm): 37. Clinical baseline data, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were analysed. The study revealed significant differences in operation time among the 3 groups (group A: 103.4 ± 36.1, group B: 106.4 ± 35.2, group C: 127.4 ± 44.8; P < 0.05) as well as in the volume of drainage (group A: 273.3 ± 162.0, group B: 411.9 ± 342.6, group C: 509.7 ± 543.7; P < 0.05). However, no differences were seen in blood loss, drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay and duration of postoperative oral analgesics. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative complications did not exhibit significant differences across these groups. Subxiphoid approach VATS is considered a feasible and safe surgical method for large-sized anterior mediastinal tumours (5.0–10.0 cm) with no invasion to the surrounding tissues and organs.
surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system