Abstract:Background Recently, computed tomography (CT) manufacturers have developed deep‐learning‐based reconstruction algorithms to compensate for the limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, such as image smoothing and the spatial resolution's dependence on contrast and dose levels. Purpose To assess the impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction (AI‐DLR) algorithm on image quality and dose reduction compared with a hybrid IR algorithm in chest CT for different clinical indications. Methods Acquisitions on the CT American College of Radiology (ACR) 464 and CT Torso CTU‐41 phantoms were performed at five dose levels (CTDIvol: 9.5/7.5/6/2.5/0.4 mGy) used for chest CT conditions. Raw data were reconstructed using filtered backprojection, two levels of IR (iDose4 levels 4 (i4) and 7 (i7)), and five levels of AI‐DLR (Precise Image; Smoother, Smooth, Standard, Sharp, Sharper). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task‐based transfer function, and detectability index (d′) were computed: d′‐modeled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule (low‐contrast soft tissue chest nodule within the mediastinum [LCN]), ground‐glass opacity (GGO), or high‐contrast pulmonary (HCP) lesion. The subjective image quality of chest anthropomorphic phantom images was independently evaluated by two radiologists. They assessed image noise, image smoothing, contrast between vessels and fat in the mediastinum for mediastinal images, visual border detection between bronchus and lung parenchyma for parenchymal images, and overall image quality using a commonly used four‐ or five‐point scale. Results From Standard to Smoother levels, on average, the noise magnitude decreased (for all dose levels: −66.3% ± 0.5% for mediastinal images and −63.1% ± 0.1% for parenchymal images), the average NPS spatial frequency decreased (for all dose levels: −35.3% ± 2.2% for mediastinal images and −13.3% ± 2.2% for parenchymal images), and the detectability (d′) of the three lesions increased. The opposite pattern was found from Standard to Sharper levels. From Smoother to Sharper levels, the spatial resolution increased for the low‐contrast polyethylene insert and the opposite for the high‐contrast air insert. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d′ values were higher using Smoother (mean for all dose levels: 338.7% ± 29.4%), Smooth (103.4% ± 11.2%), and Standard (34.1% ± 6.6%) levels for the LCN on mediastinal images and Smoother (169.5% ± 53.2% for GGO and 136.9% ± 1.6% for HCP) and Smooth (36.4% ± 22.1% and 24.1% ± 0.9%, respectively) levels for parenchymal images. Radiologists considered the images satisfactory for clinical use at these levels, but adaptation to the dose level of the protocol is required. Conclusion With AI‐DLR, the smoothest levels reduced the noise and improved the detectability of chest lesions but increased the image smoothing. The opposite was found with the sharpest levels. The choice of level depends on the dose level and type of image: mediastinal or parenchymal.

Quantitative Analysis of Airway Tree in Low-dose Chest CT with a New Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: Comparison to Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Routine-dose CT.

Effect of new model-based iterative reconstruction on computer-aided detection for quantitative analysis of airway tree in chest CT

Airway quantification using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on wide-detector low-dose CT: a validation study on lung specimen

Evaluation Of Dose Reduction And Image Quality In Chest Ct Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction With The Same Group Of Patients

Feasibility of Bronchial Wall Quantification in Low- and Ultralow-Dose Third-Generation Dual-Source CT: an Ex Vivo Lung Study

Effect of Computed Tomography Dose on Quantitative Measurement and Automated Segmentation of Airway Tree

The Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Quantitative Analysis of Pulmonary CT

Reducing the Radiation Dose with the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Chest CT in Adults: a Parameter Study.

Improving Image Quality and Nodule Characterization in Ultra-low-dose Lung CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

Effect of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (Asir-V) Levels on Ultra-Low-dose CT Radiomics Quantification in Pulmonary Nodules.

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CT Coronary Angiography with Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Strong Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-Dimensional (AIDR3D)

Application of Iterative Reconstruction to Reduce Noise in the Low-Dose Chest CT Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Level

Effects of tube voltage, radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction strength level on the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules in ultra-low-dose chest CT

Image quality assessment of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for low dose aortic CTA: A feasibility study of 70 kVp and reduced contrast medium volume

Effect of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Radiomic Features of Pulmonary Nodules in Ultra-Low-Dose CT

Task-based image quality evaluation of iterative reconstruction methods for low dose CT using computer simulations

Impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study

Low-dose CT Reconstruction Method Based on Prior Information of Normal-Dose Image

Impacts of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Robustness of CT Radiomics Features: Opportunity for Minimizing Radiomics Variability among Scans of Different Dose Levels

Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques in Brain CT

Screening for Lung Cancer Using Sub-Millisievert Chest CT with Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: Image Quality and Nodule Detectability.