Abstract:Objective: To construct a simple scoring model for predicting the biological risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on enhanced computed tomography (CT) features. Methods: The clinicopathological and imaging data of 149 patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor were retrospectively analyzed in our hospital. According to the risk classification, the patients were divided into low-risk group and high-risk group. The features of enhanced CT were observed and recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the predictors of high-risk biological behaviors of gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and then a simple scoring model was constructed according to the regression coefficients of each predictor. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of the model. Results: There was no significant difference between the risk classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumor with gender and age (P = .168, .320), while significant difference was found between the tumor size and location (P < .001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that tumor size, enlarged vessels feeding or draining the mass, peritumoral lymph node enlargement, and venous phase contrast enhancement rate were independent predictors of the biological risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (P < .05). The area under the curve value of tumor size, enlarged vessels feeding or draining the mass, peritumoral lymph node enlargement, and venous phase contrast enhancement rate as the high-risk predictor of gastrointestinal stromal tumor were 0.955, 0.729, 0.680, and 0.807, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the area under the curve of the scoring model constructed based on enhanced CT features was 0.941 (95% confidence interval: 0.891-0.973). When the total score was >1, the sensitivity of the scoring model in diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumor was 85.58%, the specificity was 88.89%, the positive predictive value was 88.51%, the negative predictive value was 86.04%, and the accuracy was 86.18%. The results of DeLong test showed that the area under the curve of the scoring model was better than that of the receiver operating characteristic curve of tumor size, enlarged vessels feeding or draining the mass, peritumoral lymph node enlargement, venous phase contrast enhancement rate, and other indicators alone in predicting the high risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and the differences were statistically significant (Z = 26.510, P < .001; Z = 3.992, P < .001; Z = 6.353, P < .001; Z = 4.052, P = .013). Conclusion: The simple scoring model based on enhanced CT features is a simple and practical clinical prediction model, which is helpful to make preoperative individualized treatment plan and improve the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.

Evaluation of Clinical Plus Imaging Features and Multidetector Computed Tomography Texture Analysis in Preoperative Risk Grade Prediction of Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

A Multi-Class Scoring System Based on CT Features for Preoperative Prediction in Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Building contrast-enhanced CT-based models for preoperatively predicting malignant potential and Ki67 expression of small intestine gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

Value of CT-Based Texture Analysis in Preoperative Prediction of the Grade of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Compared to Conventional CT Imaging

Texture Analysis of CT Images in Predicting Malignancy Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Building CT Radiomics-Based Models for Preoperatively Predicting Malignant Potential and Mitotic Count of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Simple Scoring Model Based on Enhanced CT in Preoperative Prediction of Biological Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Clinical Value of Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography Examination on Risk Assessment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Comparative Study on Pre- Diagnosed Computed Tomography Features and Post- Surgery Pathological Risk Grades of the Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

A Correlation Research of Ki67 Index, CT Features, and Risk Stratification in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

The Analysis of Clinical Diagnosis for Small Intestinal Stromal Tumor: A Review of 74 Cases

Deep learning model combined with computed tomography features to preoperatively predicting the risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Combined Model Based on Enhanced CT Texture Features in Liver Metastasis Prediction of High-Risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Predictive Value of the Texture Analysis of Enhanced Computed Tomographic Images for Preoperative Pancreatic Carcinoma Differentiation.

[The feasibility analysis of multi-slice spiral CT features of gastric stromal tumors in predicting pathological National Institutes of Health risk classification]

Predictive Value of Two-Phase Contrast Enhanced MSCT in Different Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk classification: spectral CT quantitative parameters

Prediction of High Ki-67 Proliferation Index of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Based on CT at Non-Contrast-enhanced and Different Contrast-Enhanced Phases.

Advancing gastrointestinal stromal tumor management: The role of imagomics features in precision risk assessment

A Radiomics-Clinical Combined Nomogram-Based on Non-Enhanced CT for Discriminating the Risk Stratification in GISTs.

Risk Stratification of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Are Imaging Findings and Histopathological Features Correlated?