Abstract:Introduction Transthoracic esophagectomy is a highly complex and sophisticated procedure with high morbidity rates and a significant mortality. Surgical access has consistently become less invasive, transitioning from open esophagectomy to hybrid esophagectomy (HE) then to totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), and most recently to robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), with each step demonstrating improved patient outcomes. Aim of this study with more than 600 patients is to complete a propensity-score matched comparison of postoperative short-term outcomes after highly standardized RAMIE vs. HE in a European high volume center. Patients and Methods Six hundred and eleven patients that underwent transthoracic Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between May 2016 and May 2021 were included in the study. In January 2019, we implemented an updated robotic standardized anastomotic technique using a circular stapler and ICG (indocyanine green) for RAMIE cases. Data were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database. Outcomes of patients undergoing standardized RAMIE from January 2019 to May 2021 were compared to our overall cohort from May 2016–April 2021 (HE) after a propensity-score matching analysis was performed. Results Six hundred and eleven patients were analyzed. 107 patients underwent RAMIE. Of these, a total of 76 patients underwent a robotic thoracic reconstruction using the updated standardized circular stapled anastomosis (RAMIE group). A total of 535 patients underwent HE (Hybrid group). Seventy patients were propensity-score matched in each group and analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics. RAMIE patients had a significantly shorter ICU stay ( p = 0.0218). Significantly more patients had no postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo 0) in the RAMIE group [47.1% vs. 27.1% in the HE group ( p = 0.0225)]. No difference was seen in lymph node yield and R0 resection rates. Anastomotic leakage rates when matched were 14.3% in the hybrid group vs. 4.3% in the RAMIE group ( p = 0.07). Conclusion Our analysis confirms the safety and feasibility of RAMIE and HE in a large cohort after propensity score matching. A regular postoperative course (Clavien–Dindo 0) and a shorter ICU stay were seen significantly more often after RAMIE compared to HE. Furthermore it shows that both procedures provide excellent short-term oncologic outcomes, regarding lymph node harvest and R0 resection rates. A randomized controlled trial comparing RAMIE and HE is still pending and will hopefully contribute to ongoing discussions.

Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy: 61 Consecutive Cases from a Single Chinese Institution

Application of robot-assisted minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Robot-assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (RAILE): A review of surgical techniques and clinical outcomes

Robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic robot-sewn anastomosis.

Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Using a Circular-Stapled Anastomosis with Trans-Oral Anvil: 30 Cases Report

The Impact of Surgical Assistants on Postoperative Complications in Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma

Robot Assisted Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PS01.232: SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

Use of Efficient Purse-String Stapling Technique for Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Comment On: “early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study”

Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy

Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted, video-assisted, and open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a retrospective study

Robot-assisted Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Oesophagectomy for Locally Advanced Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Robotic-assisted Versus Open Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer:a Comparative Study on Short-term Results

405. SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED ESOPHAGECTOMY

Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Manual Pursestring and Per-Thoracic Port Placement of Anvil in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center

Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

A Safe and Effective Anastomotic Technique for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy: Reverse-puncture Anastomosis

Attaining Proficiency in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy While Maximizing Safety during Procedure Development