Prophylactic Angiographic Embolisation after Endoscopic Control of Bleeding to High-Risk Peptic Ulcers: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

James Y. W. Lau,Rapat Pittayanon,Ka-Tak Wong,Nutcha Pinjaroen,Philip Wai Yan Chiu,Rungsun Rerknimitr,Ingrid Lisanne Holster,Ernst J. Kuipers,Kai-Chun Wu,Kim W. L. Au,Francis K. L. Chan,Joseph J. Y. Sung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316074
IF: 24.5
2018-01-01
Gut
Abstract:ObjectivesIn the management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, recurrent bleeding is associated with high mortality. We investigated if added angiographic embolisation after endoscopic haemostasis to high-risk ulcers could reduce recurrent bleeding.DesignAfter endoscopic haemostasis to their bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers, we randomised patients with at least one of these criteria (ulcers≥20 mm in size, spurting bleeding, hypotensive shock or haemoglobin<9 g/dL) to receive added angiographic embolisation or standard treatment. Our primary endpoint was recurrent bleeding within 30 days.ResultsBetween January 2010 and July 2014, 241 patients were randomised (added angiographic embolisation n=118, standard treatment n=123); 22 of 118 patients (18.6%) randomised to angiography did not receive embolisation. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 12 (10.2%) in the embolisation and 14 (11.4%) in the standard treatment group reached the primary endpoint (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.46; p=0.745). The rate of reinterventions (13 vs 17; p=0.510) and deaths (3 vs 5, p=0.519) were similar. In a per-protocol analysis, 6 of 96 (6.2%) rebled after embolisation compared with 14 of 123 (11.4%) in the standard treatment group (HR 1.89, 95% CI 0.73 to 4.92; p=0.192). None of 96 patients died after embolisation compared with 5 (4.1%) deaths in the standard treatment group (p=0.108). In a posthoc analysis, embolisation reduced recurrent bleeding only in patients with ulcers≥15 mm in size (2 (4.5%) vs 12 (23.1%); p=0.027).ConclusionsAfter endoscopic haemostasis, added embolisation does not reduce recurrent bleeding.Trial registration numberNCT01142180.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?