Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND Transarterial embolization (TAE) for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) can be technically challenging due to the compromise between achieving hemostasis and causing tissue ischemia. The goal of the present study is to determine its technical success, rebleeding, and post-embolization ischemia rates through meta-analysis of published literature in the last twenty-years. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Technical success, rebleeding, and ischemia rates were extracted. Baseline characteristics such as author, publication year, region, study design, embolization material, percentage of superselective embolization were retrieved. Subgroup analysis was performed based on publication time and embolization agent. RESULTS A total of 66 studies including 2121 patients who underwent embolization for acute LGIB were included. Endoscopic management was attempted in 34.5%. The pooled overall technical success, rebleeding, post-embolization ischemia rates were 97.0%, 20.7%, and 7.5%, respectively. Studies published after 2010 showed higher technical success rates (97.8% vs 95.2%), lower rebleeding rates (18.6% vs 23.4%), and lower ischemia rates (7.3% vs 9.7%). Compared to microcoils, NBCA was associated with a lower rebleeding rate (9.3% vs 20.8%) at the expense of a higher post-embolization ischemia rate (9.7% vs 4.0%). Coagulopathy (p = 0.034), inotropic use (p = 0.040), and malignancy (p = 0.002) were predictors of post-embolization rebleeding; hemorrhagic shock (p < 0.001), inotropic use (p = 0.026), malignancy (p < 0.001), coagulopathy (p = 0.002), blood transfusion (p < 0.001), and enteritis (p = 0.023) were predictors of mortality. Empiric embolization achieved a similarly durable hemostasis rate to targeted embolization (23.6% vs 21.1%) but a higher risk of post-embolization ischemia (14.3% vs 4.7%). CONCLUSION For LGIB, TAE has a favorable technical success rate and low risk of post-embolization ischemia. Its safety and efficacy profile has increased over the last decade. Compared to microcoils, NBCA seemed to offer a more durable hemostasis rate at the expense of higher ischemia risk. Due to the heterogeneity of currently available evidence, future prospective and comparative studies are warranted.

Risk factors for rebleeding and mortality following prophylactic transarterial embolization for patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Factors influencing re-bleeding after trans-arterial embolization for endoscopically unmanageable peptic ulcer bleeding

Risk Factors for Predicting Early Variceal Rebleeding after Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Prophylactic Angiographic Embolisation after Endoscopic Control of Bleeding to High-Risk Peptic Ulcers: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Prophylactic transcatheter arterial embolization reduces rebleeding in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis

Failure of initial renal arterial embolization for severe post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy hemorrhage: a multicenter study of risk factors

Transcatheter arterial embolization for small-bowel bleeding: technical and clinical outcomes and risk factors for early recurrent bleeding

157 Early Angiographic Embolization after Endoscopic Hemostasis to High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers Improves Outcomes

Failure of Initial Superselective Renal Arterial Embolization in the Treatment of Renal Hemorrhage after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Respective Analysis of Risk Factors

Patient and endoscopic characteristics and clinical outcomes in subjects with non-variceal GI bleeding referred for transarterial embolization: a single-center experience

Predictors for severe hemorrhage requiring angioembolization post percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center experience over 3 years

Embolization versus surgery for peptic ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic hemostasis: a meta-analysis

Twenty-years of Embolization for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Meta-analysis of Rebleeding and Ischemia Rates

[Risk Factors Associated with Failure from Endoscopic Therapy in Acute Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding].

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization Compared With Surgery for Uncontrolled Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Population-based Cohort Study

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Clinically Significant Post-ERCP Bleeding: a Contemporary Multi-center Study

Risk factors and predictive nomograms for bedside emergency endoscopic treatment following endotracheal intubation in cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding

Transcatheter arterial embolization for cancer-related non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter retrospective study of 107 patients

The Importance of Arterial Blood Flow Detection for Risk Stratification and Eradication to Achieve Definitive Hemostasis of Severe Non-Variceal UGI Hemorrhage

Associations Between Endoscopic Primary Prophylaxis and Rebleeding in Liver Cirrhosis Patients with Esophagogastric Variceal Bleeding

A retrospective observational study assessing mortality after pelvic trauma embolisation